Skip to comments.“Marriage Equality” Spells “Marriage Extinction”
Posted on 03/25/2013 8:57:25 AM PDT by Olog-hai
click here to read article
just when will the American people stand up>
Will it be when their 401 goes to hell or when they are directly hurt?
They had better wake up to what this family and this far left admin are doing .
Waiting till they have nothing , being sued, being charged a visit off the cops for speaking out on a certain issue is too late
yea one problem though, blood test, marriage certificate, divorce, who gets the kids, get the house etc.
I;m sick of this turd poking strap on wearing agenda, hell just because Hollywood has loads of them doe snot mean many other parts of this country does.
MA might have a ton as might NY City but many other parts do not and we are sick of this crap agenda.
If the court gets rid of DOMA then all lawsuits for adoption agencies , churches, even the cake maker will be sued and the queers had beter not stop or compain when polygamy comes to us too because it was their baby tantrum actionsand arguments which caused this mess.
One line in the sand is marraige and th eother line is anything
I know damn well where I stand and if anyone comes here and tells me they are married in their sham they will be told very quickly that they;re not
it;s very impossible to have communities like the Amish in the real world and watch all the alwsuits to adoption agencies, churches, etc
Non of this should have happened and would not if our sdie spoke up to family , neighbors, talk radio, hell I heard some talk radio today and mostly Hannity and you would think none of this was going on , he;s nothing but a coward
“’Marriage equality’ becomes ‘marriage elasticity,’ with the ultimate goal of ‘marriage extinction.’”
That about sums it up. Their real goal is to abolish of special status for the God-given and created institution of the natural family and replace it with the state.
You and I have a different definition of marriage, my friend. A marriage is not made by "honoring vows," but by the grace of God. People an "honor vows" and be any which way they please. The state has no place in defining, taxing, regulating or otherwise claiming dominion over that which is God's alone. God has made marriage. The state is powerless to destroy it. What you and the state calls marriage, I call the fallen nature of man: the claim that men have the power of God.
Your post, inarticulately though it may have been, brings up the greatest issue of overturning DOMA: family law.
Throughout American history, the state has continually claimed an increasingly powerful role in the lives of everyday citizens’ families, beginning with compulsory state education. The answer is not to enforce MORE laws ensuring MORE state control of what we hold dear, but FEWER laws.
If you are correct that the problem exists in a few states, then why not end the “marriage” business by the government? The problems will only exist in those few states. End the state’s role in the “education” (perversion) of children, and you will put an end to 99% of the absolute crap we face.
Those who live unholy and impure lives will live with the consequences of their actions. Those who live rightly will do better. While I agree holiness is better than sin, that is clearly not the State’s proper role.
So I agree with you. It is a minority that want to pervert children and society. Let that minority sit in their own little communities and get the state out of the business of forcing it on everyone else: get the government OUT of our families and the Holy Mysteries/Sacraments of our churches. Get the government OUT of education.
Just keep it the way it is, marriage is bewteen one man and one woman though common sense doesn;t seem to be much around lately and that;s why we have idiots, perverts and nutjobs wanting all sorts of marriage regardless of how it affects the kids.
Also the Govt out of it slogan.
There are blood test, divorce, marriage certificate, who get the kids.
Keep mariage as it is, my wife and I got maried , not in a religious setting not off a Rev because of religion differences.
Yes the Govt married us.
Define the “real world.”
I refuse to be part of that, and join communities that are not part of that. If your town has more than 3,000 people and is within 500 miles of a city with more than 250,000, move.
Marriage means one man and one woman, according to Natural Law which is created by God, by biology (also created by God) and is part and parcel of Natural Law.
I am not interested, for the discussion of preventing sodomy/two men/two women/fake “marriage” to get into details of religious meanings of marriage. That narrows support.
Simple nature, biology, and every religion in the world says “man+woman=marriage”.
You want to narrow support, that’s your choice. I want to widen support. The government has no freaking right to change the eternal and natural meaning of marriage to cater to mentally ill sex perverts.
Was thinking about what you said last night and it;s not a bad idea.
I remember years ago that liberal tarians wanted to take a state over and they said all move to NH.
Maybe if every conservative got the hell out of the north east and right on the coast of the west coast then certain red states would an influx of millions moving to their state, would see socialist states lose voters and tax money.
To some degree you see that in Texas.
Of course, they are also getting the liberal locusts in search of jobs who will vote their stupid ways and not understand why things suck.
I have never understood as to why the far left, homosexuals, cross dressers and other whacky weirdo’s move to the south or parts of the midwest.
I’m in North east FL , St A gustine
and it;s very republican but the south east part of this state has been a cess pit for decades because of those north easterners moving down here.
If you move to another state then surely one would think about what that new state offers, what tax is imposed, does it have a state tax, what laws are there, who is it run by and which party, what are the demographics, census etc.
If lets say 3 millions southerners moved to New England area and we all took our grits, accents, confederate flags, hunting and shooting and guns .
We then started to vote to get our kind of people elected, we took over those small north east towns,
We would say have a blesed day and brought yes sir and no mam, we drive slower and with manners
I guarantee that those northerners which seem to happy to come south and take over parts of the south woudl then complain how their New England states are being invaded, how it;s changed and the liberal ways have gone, marriage is one man and one woman,now etc.
No matter where they went up there they heard southern accents etc, the same liberal socialist idiotic people which infest the south would complain like mad how their areas have changed and how now it;s conservative and how they don;t like it.
If a turd poker wants mariage then go to MA and stop demanding how others shoudl change to suit his views.
We had a guy who moved here from up north and within a week wanted his bike license.
He was also in a group demanding to get the helmet law legal in this state.
When he wa asked why did you move here, you;ve only been here for weks and why don;t you go back he replied”well it;s better for people to wear helmets”
He actually thinks he shoudl move here and tell millions of others what we should wear which does not affect him, BTW he was from OH and should move back with his attitude
“Yes the Govt married us.”
You’ve already redefined “marriage” to something unrecognizable. What happens to the term afterwards is not my fault.
I don’t mind calling it a “civil union,” since that is all civil governments are competent to create. Now, if you want to talk about civil unions, that’s a different issue altogther, and one on which we will probably agree.
then you and I disagree, many get married by a justice of the peace and whether you like it or or the fact is Govt is invilved and they decide who gets the kids etc
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
If the word "marriage" were to mean two sex perverts having a ceremony that pronounces them (husband and husband? wife and wife? or ?) and they are legally recognized as a married couple just as a married man and woman, then marriage would mean nothing at all.
Anyone wanting on/off either ping list, FREEPMAIL me.
“Gay Marriage” may be “gay” but it ain’t “marriage.”
it;s just all bizarre, what is a husband and wife in their sham, what about having 4 wivs and a husband which is even more normal, what about them going to another country and then trying to tell most of the world they are married once they go through the airport security.,
These people have mental problems and seem to think that they were told off the homosexual activists they;re normal who make money out of this then they are normal
CHQ is pretty much on target with their comment about pandering to these perverts: “Todays Supreme Court hearing isnt really about fairness or the separation of powers between the states and the federal government it is about stifling traditional Christian religious freedom and undermining the influence of traditional Christian practices and beliefs on American culture.”
Natural marriage existed long before it was recognized sacramental.
“Natural Marriage” was CREATED by GOD. It did not exist “before” it was a sacrament. It was a sacrament given to Adam and Eve in the Garden. If you don’t believe that, it’s fine. It’s a theological issue. One in which the State has no role.
Having said that, I have had numerous discussions with various homos and homo lovers. The results were that *they* don’t want the state out of marriage either. They will not rest until they force CHURCHES to “accept” their disease as “marriage.”
Get the government out of marriage and they don’t have that power. They know that and that’s why they won’t support civil unions (by the state) for everyone, which would truly make everyone equal. They don’t want “equality,” they want forced subjugation.
“, many get married by a justice of the peace and whether you like it or or the fact is Govt is invilved “
So you and the government claim. That is no more a marriage than the Sun revolves around the Earth. The state may claim it is and it may play pretend that it is. That doesn’t make it so.
that is in your view, see different views, you should understand not everyone thinks like you and therefore because they do not then they are not wrong.
Ofcourse using the justice of the peace to have two people be married and avoid religion or have two epople who are not religious get married throws out the usual bumper sticker slogan from the liberaltarians trolls and infiltrators who are pushing a communist agenda