Skip to comments.“Marriage Equality” Spells “Marriage Extinction”
Posted on 03/25/2013 8:57:25 AM PDT by Olog-hai
click here to read article
To some degree you see that in Texas.
Of course, they are also getting the liberal locusts in search of jobs who will vote their stupid ways and not understand why things suck.
I have never understood as to why the far left, homosexuals, cross dressers and other whacky weirdo’s move to the south or parts of the midwest.
I’m in North east FL , St A gustine
and it;s very republican but the south east part of this state has been a cess pit for decades because of those north easterners moving down here.
If you move to another state then surely one would think about what that new state offers, what tax is imposed, does it have a state tax, what laws are there, who is it run by and which party, what are the demographics, census etc.
If lets say 3 millions southerners moved to New England area and we all took our grits, accents, confederate flags, hunting and shooting and guns .
We then started to vote to get our kind of people elected, we took over those small north east towns,
We would say have a blesed day and brought yes sir and no mam, we drive slower and with manners
I guarantee that those northerners which seem to happy to come south and take over parts of the south woudl then complain how their New England states are being invaded, how it;s changed and the liberal ways have gone, marriage is one man and one woman,now etc.
No matter where they went up there they heard southern accents etc, the same liberal socialist idiotic people which infest the south would complain like mad how their areas have changed and how now it;s conservative and how they don;t like it.
If a turd poker wants mariage then go to MA and stop demanding how others shoudl change to suit his views.
We had a guy who moved here from up north and within a week wanted his bike license.
He was also in a group demanding to get the helmet law legal in this state.
When he wa asked why did you move here, you;ve only been here for weks and why don;t you go back he replied”well it;s better for people to wear helmets”
He actually thinks he shoudl move here and tell millions of others what we should wear which does not affect him, BTW he was from OH and should move back with his attitude
“Yes the Govt married us.”
You’ve already redefined “marriage” to something unrecognizable. What happens to the term afterwards is not my fault.
I don’t mind calling it a “civil union,” since that is all civil governments are competent to create. Now, if you want to talk about civil unions, that’s a different issue altogther, and one on which we will probably agree.
then you and I disagree, many get married by a justice of the peace and whether you like it or or the fact is Govt is invilved and they decide who gets the kids etc
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
If the word "marriage" were to mean two sex perverts having a ceremony that pronounces them (husband and husband? wife and wife? or ?) and they are legally recognized as a married couple just as a married man and woman, then marriage would mean nothing at all.
Anyone wanting on/off either ping list, FREEPMAIL me.
“Gay Marriage” may be “gay” but it ain’t “marriage.”
it;s just all bizarre, what is a husband and wife in their sham, what about having 4 wivs and a husband which is even more normal, what about them going to another country and then trying to tell most of the world they are married once they go through the airport security.,
These people have mental problems and seem to think that they were told off the homosexual activists they;re normal who make money out of this then they are normal
CHQ is pretty much on target with their comment about pandering to these perverts: “Todays Supreme Court hearing isnt really about fairness or the separation of powers between the states and the federal government it is about stifling traditional Christian religious freedom and undermining the influence of traditional Christian practices and beliefs on American culture.”
Natural marriage existed long before it was recognized sacramental.
“Natural Marriage” was CREATED by GOD. It did not exist “before” it was a sacrament. It was a sacrament given to Adam and Eve in the Garden. If you don’t believe that, it’s fine. It’s a theological issue. One in which the State has no role.
Having said that, I have had numerous discussions with various homos and homo lovers. The results were that *they* don’t want the state out of marriage either. They will not rest until they force CHURCHES to “accept” their disease as “marriage.”
Get the government out of marriage and they don’t have that power. They know that and that’s why they won’t support civil unions (by the state) for everyone, which would truly make everyone equal. They don’t want “equality,” they want forced subjugation.
“, many get married by a justice of the peace and whether you like it or or the fact is Govt is invilved “
So you and the government claim. That is no more a marriage than the Sun revolves around the Earth. The state may claim it is and it may play pretend that it is. That doesn’t make it so.
that is in your view, see different views, you should understand not everyone thinks like you and therefore because they do not then they are not wrong.
Ofcourse using the justice of the peace to have two people be married and avoid religion or have two epople who are not religious get married throws out the usual bumper sticker slogan from the liberaltarians trolls and infiltrators who are pushing a communist agenda
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.