Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(CNN Avlon) Sarah PAC "Somewhere Between A Business And A Racket"
RCP Video ^ | 3-30-2013

Posted on 03/31/2013 7:03:02 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot

JOHN AVLON, CNN CONTRIBUTOR: "....the Federal Election Commission filings for her PAC, the SarahPAC show is that the vast amount of the money raised and spent in the last election cycle was on consultants. It did not go to candidates.

In fact less than $300,000 went to candidates. She spent more on her top consultant than she did in all the candidates she doled out money to. ..... When people give money to these political action committees, they think they're getting political action. What they're really doing is feeding a whole subcategory of consulting industry out there, a partisan economy."

BLITZER: What were the consultants doing over there? What were they working for?

AVLON: ".....I thought the whole point of grassroots outreach is that you didn't need a consultant to tell you how to do it, especially from Sarah Palin's perspective. ..... . But the big picture, very little (INAUDIBLE) of the money -- millions that Sarah Palin raised through her SarahPAC ended up going to candidates. The vast majority of it went to consultants."

BLITZER: How much influence does she really have these days within the GOP?

AVLON: It's diminished. .... But there's no question, Sarah Palin is an influencer, especially in the conservative populous movement. She's very popular among the base. And now she's trying to present herself as this kingmaker, as you said. ...... So it's a reminder of a great quote by Eric Hoffer, which is all great movements begin as a cause, it become a business, and they end up as a racket, well, we're somewhere between business and racket right now.

(Watch the whole clip)

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Politics
KEYWORDS: elections; palin; sarahpac; sarahpalin

1 posted on 03/31/2013 7:03:02 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Obama is somewhere between a traitor and a grifter. Although, with his skills, I think he may be both.


2 posted on 03/31/2013 7:06:22 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Palin bump!

:D


3 posted on 03/31/2013 7:08:14 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

All they have to do is make some practice illegal, make the law retro, and they have her where they’ve always wanted her.

She might as well run for office, they won’t stop the persecution in any case.


4 posted on 03/31/2013 7:11:59 AM PDT by HomeAtLast ( You're either with the Tea Party, or you're with the EBT Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

john avalon is somewhere between a nitwit and a pinhead.


5 posted on 03/31/2013 7:14:13 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

If she gave it ALL away to candidates they would be complaining “She didnt hire one single consultant to advise her”

Thye must really be afraid of her


6 posted on 03/31/2013 7:18:45 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

There is zero question that is the case.

The real question is: Will Sarah run this time.

I sure hope so.


7 posted on 03/31/2013 7:20:33 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

These MSM hacks keep telling us that Palin is history. Why do they continue to spend so much time and space on her? Could it be that the Rats and Rino’s are scared to death of her? Me thinks so.


8 posted on 03/31/2013 7:25:47 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
I don't even know where to start. Maybe with the fact that Political Action Committees exist to hire those who further their action? Sheesh.

By any means, they must destroy Palin - a strong, honorable, family oriented, successful "conservative" woman.

9 posted on 03/31/2013 7:27:01 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomeAtLast

Yep, that’s what they did to Nixon too - they kept him in court and stripped him of protection.

They will do the same to Sarah try to prevent her from getting wealthy.


10 posted on 03/31/2013 7:32:57 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
the video cnn doesn't want you to see
11 posted on 03/31/2013 7:47:25 AM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"The real question is: Will Sarah run this time."

Another real question is: Why isn't Obama being investigated instead of Sarah????

12 posted on 03/31/2013 7:53:14 AM PDT by LADY J (ues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Six cents out of every dollar SarahPac received in the 2012 election cycle went to actual candidates. The better move is to give to candidates directly and not to the PACs.


13 posted on 03/31/2013 8:00:51 AM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

They are indirectly complaining that the consultants that Sarah is hiring actually are making a difference unlike the GOPs!


14 posted on 03/31/2013 8:15:45 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (I’m not a Republican, I’m a conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

cnn... somewhere between he and ll.

LLS


15 posted on 03/31/2013 8:21:06 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

I agree - but look at her success rate. She spent far less then that RINO Karl Rove and helped more candidates.


16 posted on 03/31/2013 8:28:54 AM PDT by wewereright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I would say the same about CNN, but since CNN looses money, it is more of a dishonest liberal charity organization than anything else.


17 posted on 03/31/2013 8:43:53 AM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
And what is the Southern Poverty Law Center/Morris Dees?

And what is Handgun Control, Inc./Sarah Brady?

And what is The Tides Foundation/George Soros.

18 posted on 03/31/2013 9:09:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wewereright

Ding Ding Ding!!!!!


19 posted on 03/31/2013 9:21:30 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

And don’t forget WHO donated to Rove’s PAC vs. Sarah PAC.


20 posted on 03/31/2013 9:22:56 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
"Avalon misses, not understanding that PACs are required to measure and assign value not only to all expenditures, but efforts “in-kind,” and anything that can legally be defined as “electioneering” must be reported as an expenditure. This is poor journalism at best, while we may suspect it as a malicious attempt to “punch up.” Avlon needs to do his homework before opining."

Attack on Palin and SarahPAC Misses the Mark

Robert Stacy McCain: Why John Avlon Hates Sarah Palin – Update: Ali Akbar: Avlon Needs to Do His Homework

21 posted on 03/31/2013 9:29:03 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Thanks, good find.

Both links are good stuff.


22 posted on 03/31/2013 9:45:36 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

You really ought to get out more. SarahPAC is limited to donating a maximum of $5000 per candidate per election, but those contributions are but a very small part of what a Palin endorsement does for a candidate.

We don’t contribute to SarahPAC because we want her to pass the money along to candidates. We contribute to SarahPAC because we appreciate the work that Sarah does and we know that SarahPAC does have expenses which support her works to renew our republic. When Sarah endorses a candidate, many of us will send the candidate a few dollars which we probably wouldn’t have sent had she not endorsed him/her.


23 posted on 03/31/2013 9:57:15 AM PDT by RefudiateObama2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Like clockwork, whenever Obama’s job approval ratings fall below 50% (46%) yesterday, the MSM goes into full Palin-attack mode to try to distract from the buffoon in the WH

It’s as dependable as the sunrise.


24 posted on 03/31/2013 10:06:22 AM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield ("I can see unhinged liberal media madness from my house!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Hey John!

Is it bigger than the ACORN racket?


25 posted on 03/31/2013 10:08:59 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

They sure spend a lot of air time and ink on someone so irrelevant! If you’re taking flake you must be over the target!


26 posted on 03/31/2013 11:04:20 AM PDT by JaguarXKE (Welcome to the new America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oincobx
Six cents out of every dollar SarahPac received in the 2012 election cycle went to actual candidates. The better move is to give to candidates directly and not to the PACs.

Well, do that if it makes you feel better. As far as what SarahPAC is doing, results are all that matter, and they're uniformly excellent.

27 posted on 03/31/2013 11:16:35 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Avlon’s problem is that he framed his premise on the notion that the money given to a PAC is supposed to go directly to candidates. It’s not - the purpose of the SaraPAC is to support good candidates, but more importantly, to promote and support good IDEAS!

I would view SarahPAC more as an NRA type organization promoting freedom and the constitution, as opposed to a funnel that channels money to candidates wholesale. It is not the RNC nor the DNC.


28 posted on 03/31/2013 11:20:59 AM PDT by meyer (When people fear the government, you have Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat1000

Golly, the CNN lady in that video is dumber than a fence post. Dumber than a rotted-out fence post!


29 posted on 03/31/2013 11:26:48 AM PDT by meyer (When people fear the government, you have Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“As far as what SarahPAC is doing, results are all that matter, and they’re uniformly excellent. “

Including her support for McLame??


30 posted on 03/31/2013 11:28:17 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

The net result of this article - $25 donated to SarahPAC! :)


31 posted on 03/31/2013 11:31:07 AM PDT by meyer (When people fear the government, you have Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

CNN should be shot down for a comment like that.


32 posted on 03/31/2013 11:41:23 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

this clown in an offensive asshole.


33 posted on 03/31/2013 11:42:16 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Including her support for McLame??

As far as I'm aware, SarahPAC had nothing to do with that endorsement.

Had Palin not endorsed McCain in his re-election bid, she would have (rightfully) been judged as an ungrateful wretch for the rest of her days. As badly as it hurt her with some conservatives, it was the only logical choice she could make, and still remain viable in national politics.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Sarah repaid McCain in full and with interest, with her 2010 endorsement. She no longer owes that man the time of day, or even a return phone call.

34 posted on 03/31/2013 12:14:19 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
See post#21, there was some history of John Avlon dissing Sarah Palin.

However it is gross negligent on Avlon’s part to offer his opinion as such and Wolf Blitzer not exposing it.

But we both know CNN is not pretending to 'report'.

35 posted on 03/31/2013 12:32:05 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“As far as I’m aware, SarahPAC had nothing to do with that endorsement. “


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2423951/posts

“Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s SarahPAC has donated money to the campaigns of Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Orrin Hatch of Utah, as well as to Republican Ohio Senate candidate Rob Portman, according to a Friday filing with the Federal Election Commission.......

It had already been widely reported that SarahPAC contributed to Senators John McCain and Lisa Murkowski. Former Governor Palin’s PAC recently had to reduce its donations to each those campaigns from $5,000 each to $4,800 each in order to qualify as a “multi-candidate” political action committee, but the technicality has now been satisfied:

_________________

“Sarah repaid McCain in full and with interest, with her 2010 endorsement. She no longer owes that man the time of day, or even a return phone call.”

Agreed! Let me know when she actually says she is opposed to anything the old fool does or supports.
I’m still hoping. And waiting.


36 posted on 03/31/2013 12:33:03 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

For a couple million a year, Sarah Palin on her own was more effective than Rove’s spending of hundreds of millions.

I’d say she delivered by far the most bang for the buck of any political contribution out there, and people are supposed to pay attention to this faux-moderate twerp complaining?


37 posted on 03/31/2013 1:02:18 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

The top endorsement in America, the greatest force for conservatism since Reagan.

Palin gave us Cruz, she gave us our only senate seat pick up in 2012 when the rest of the GOP was going down in flames, and when we think of almost all the bright lights in the GOP, in the Senate, the Congress, the Governor houses, who dominate the news today, we think of Palin.


38 posted on 03/31/2013 1:34:43 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Let me know when she actually says she is opposed to anything the old fool does or supports. I’m still hoping. And waiting.

If you pay attention to Palin's positions at all, then you already know that she stands in the opposite corner to McCain on a host of issues.

If you're waiting for her to come out and publicly denounce McCain by name for one of his positions, you might be waiting a while. She rarely takes a Republican politician to task by name, though she sure does rake their policies, agendas, and performance of their duties over the coals.

In that wise, she's not unlike many of the conservative politicians who draw admiration around here. In my view, they refrain from personally attacking Republicans because it only aids and abets our avowed enemies. I'd love to be a fly on the wall when they say how they really feel.

39 posted on 03/31/2013 2:32:37 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: oincobx; RefudiateObama2012; Sir Napsalot
13 posted on 3/31/2013 10:00:51 AM by oincobx: “Six cents out of every dollar SarahPac received in the 2012 election cycle went to actual candidates. The better move is to give to candidates directly and not to the PACs.”

There's a lot of truth to that, and not just with regard to Sarah Palin.

If your goal is to help a candidate, give to the candidate.

If your goal is to help an organization because you believe in that organization's goals and think it is effectively accomplishing them, give to that organization.

Both types of giving are legitimate.

23 posted on 3/31/2013 11:57:15 AM by RefudiateObama2012: “You really ought to get out more. SarahPAC is limited to donating a maximum of $5000 per candidate per election, but those contributions are but a very small part of what a Palin endorsement does for a candidate. We don’t contribute to SarahPAC because we want her to pass the money along to candidates. We contribute to SarahPAC because we appreciate the work that Sarah does and we know that SarahPAC does have expenses which support her works to renew our republic. When Sarah endorses a candidate, many of us will send the candidate a few dollars which we probably wouldn’t have sent had she not endorsed him/her.”

This comment is exactly right. A Sarah Palin endorsement says candidate so-and-so is someone who shares values similar to her, and that gets other people to give money and support. I have no problem with that, though I have several problems with several of her endorsements. Frankly, I wish she had **MORE** consultants to give her better “on the ground” intel on what some of the people she is considering endorsing are doing.

Palin is trying, with some success, to create a counterweight against RINOs in the Republican Party. She's also trying to keep herself relevant in politics to preserve her own political options.

There's nothing wrong with that. Just be sure you know what you're doing before you mail the check.

40 posted on 04/01/2013 1:44:55 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

What absolute nonsense. Just another hit piece against Governor Palin, trying to convince people that everything in the world is okay just so long as The Ruling Class keeps destroying the Constitution and ripping us off. Sarah Palin is the Real Deal and she speaks the truth. Period. She wasn’t railing against all consultants in general, only the moderate elitists who’ve ruined the Republican brand. People like Karl Rove have only a 1% success rate with his candidate’s endorsements versus Palin’s 75%. The woman is smart, influential, and CONNECTS with people whom deeply care about this country.

I know you are not that stupid. So the only conclusion one can come to is either you didn’t watch the video, you don’t have a clue who was in that video. Or like most LOW-Information Voters on the LEFT, if we are not talking about POTUS, then politics is too insignificant to concern me. Regardless of the reason your conclusion is SAD. To say Palin spends her time just building up her own image, is like saying Mother Teresa was in it for herself.

For one second do any of you on the LEFT think if Palin felt she wasn’t making a difference she would be doing what she is doing? What is in it for Palin, just to have her name out there? I understand completely if you are Fox News and/or a member of the Republican Establishment, the threat Palin brings (if she ran 3rd Party, the Republican Party would be finished), so I understand why they would do everything they possibly can to destroy her. First they tried the debasing (anonymously if they thought it would work), then they stopped her from speaking, then finally they refuse to bring her name up, even though she clearly has the largest following on the political RIGHT. We wouldn’t be reading about her or talking about her if she wasn’t.

This is just another article by a writer who is either clueless (because he doesn’t do his homework) or a hit job by someone whose allegiance is to the Republican Party. Palin has as many options as any leader in politics, and better opportunities to succeed than nearly all others. Those that don’t believe this are listening to the wrong voices. Check out those crowds in the video, that should clarify my message.

She is a threat to the status quo. Hence, the four years of non-stop bashing from the GOP Elite, the DNC, Hollywood, overpaid consultant talking heads on television, and yes, major media. Well guess what? She is still standing. You have not heard the last from Sarah Palin.


41 posted on 04/01/2013 9:08:13 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson