Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teachers Suing Union For Violating Right-to-Work Law
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 4/2/2013 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 04/05/2013 9:33:21 AM PDT by MichCapCon

Bureaucrats are a better bet than the courts. That appears to be the strategy behind the union's legal defense of the Taylor School District's right-to-work dodging contract.

On Feb. 28, three Taylor teachers filed a lawsuit contesting the legality of a new contract between the Taylor district and its teachers' union (the Taylor Federation of Teachers Local 1085). The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation is representing three teachers: Angela Steffke, Nancy Rhatigan and Rebecca Metz.

The school district and union negotiated two separate agreements between the signing of Michigan's right-to-work law in December and today, the date the law takes effect. There was a four-year collective bargaining agreement and also a separate 10-year union security agreement. Under the security agreement, Taylor teachers are forced to pay union dues or fees for the next decade to keep their jobs.

In the case's latest development, the school district and the union, which are both represented by the same attorney, do not want the court to hear the case. They are asking Wayne County Circuit Judge Daphne Means Curtis to send the case to the Michigan Employment Relations Commission.

In a written response to the lawsuit, Mark H. Cousens, attorney for the union and the school district, stated the following:

"This court lacks jurisdiction to consider matters arising under the Public Employment Relations Act . . . as those matters are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Michigan Employment Relations Commission."

Mackinac Center Legal Foundation Senior Attorney Derk Wilcox disagrees. Wilcox said Cousens' response seems to be both a delaying tactic and an attempt to shift the case to a more union-friendly venue.

"In their answer they make it clear that they want to short-circuit the teachers' day in court," Wilcox said. "The union wants to remove the matter from the hands of the Circuit Court judge, and take it to MERC. The likely reason for this is that the union wants to delay the matter as long as possible. The union also probably believes that the MERC administrative law judges are more favorable to their cause.

"MERC jurisdiction is limited to overseeing union elections, unfair labor complaints, and violations of the union's duty of fair representation," Wilcox continued. "The Taylor teachers' lawsuit contains none of those things and involves matters of contract and the duty of school boards that clearly have no place in MERC. So a detour to MERC would only result in justice delayed."

TOPICS: Politics

1 posted on 04/05/2013 9:33:21 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Springman; Sioux-san; 70th Division; JPG; PGalt; DuncanWaring; taildragger; epluribus_2; Chuck54; ..
This should be fun to watch.

If anyone wants to be added to the Michigan Cap Con ping list, let me know.
2 posted on 04/05/2013 9:40:39 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; MichCapCon
the school district and the union, which are both represented by the same attorney

You just can't make this stuff up. Hopefully these three teachers kick the rears of the union and school district.

It will be fun to watch!

3 posted on 04/05/2013 9:48:10 AM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Most school districts are union owned. It was a long term strategy that worked.

Electing your employer (MEA Strategy guide)
4 posted on 04/05/2013 9:50:40 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I am in district U46 in Elgin IL. This sort of shenanigans has gone on for years. One firm (in particular) has sued the district for several racial based “inequalities”. The same firm is employed by the district to represent the district.

The cases go on for years. The last I read about was 10 years.

It was a 1 million dollar discrimination suit or some such figure, and in the end, it cost the district over 15 million in legal fees.

Our states attorney is non other than Michael Madigan’s (our dem speaker of the house) daughter, Lisa Madigan.

This is par for the course here in our bankrupt state (which by the way cannot pay it’s bills, but attorney fees and pensions are top on the list of payees).

5 posted on 04/05/2013 10:50:27 AM PDT by esoxmagnum (The rats have been trained to pull the D voting lever to get their little food pellet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson