[knarf]

Blog pimping.

There is absolutely nothing that is new here, nor is it forbidden ... this shameless blog pimping.

[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

0bama’s use of Harrison J. Bounel’s and Lucille Ballantyne’s Social Security numbers on his tax forms are enough to prosecute him. Orly Taitz knows the score but there is something much bigger going on here, and probably beyond our borders.

[bgill]

What chance does any free society in such deep denial have to continue?

It doesn't.

[SvenMagnussen]

In Hawaii, access to post-adoption records are controlled by HI Rev. Stat. §§ 578-14; 578-15; 338-20, a new birth certificate is issued, the original birth certificate shall be sealed. The sealed document may be opened by the department only by an order of a court or when requested in accordance with § 578-15.

http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com/2013/01/obamas-sealed-vital-statistics-in-hawaii.html

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[azishot]

What chance does any free society in such deep denial have to continue? Not much.

Says it all.

[American Constitutionalist]

The human nature is a curious creature indeed.

For what is " Forbidden " ? tends to tempt the human nature and perk their interest in the human nature.

Go ahead and put it on the " Forbidden " list, but all that will do is cause more and more people to gravitate towards it, and become and perk their interest in it.
The more they persecute those who are trying to uncover the lid on Obama's birth origins, the more it will be exposed.

[x]

Meanwhile, British paternity, even if it does, in Obama’s case, come via Africa, is the very disqualifier the founders had in mind on crafting the “natural born” criterion more than two centuries ago to guard against a president with divided loyalties.

Yet all of the founders had "British paternity." Clearly they wanted to ensure against foreigners coming here to take the country over electorally.

It's less certain that they'd exclude anyone who was born here to one American parent from holding office because the other parent may have been foreign-born.

We have already had presidents who fit that description (Arthur, Wilson, Hoover). While Wilson's and Hoover's mothers received US citizenship at the time of their marriage according to the law of the times, it's not clear to me whether they lost their British citizenship under British law.

The early constitutional commentator William Rawle has become controversial because of his views on secession, but he was clear about his reading of the natural born clause, writing:

The citizens of each state constituted the citizens of the United States when the Constitution was adopted. The rights which appertained to them as citizens of those respective commonwealths, accompanied them in the formation of the great, compound commonwealth which ensued. They became citizens of the latter, without ceasing to be citizens of the former, and he who was subsequently born a citizen of a state, became at the moment of his birth a citizen of the United States. Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.

I'm not saying Rawle is right about this. I certainly would disagree with some of the views I've heard attributed to him on other subjects, and I'm pretty sure he didn't say the last word on citizenship law, but Rawle was writing at a time (1825-1829) when a few of the founders were still alive and able to argue with him if they disagreed.

[TNoldman]

NBC