Skip to comments.High-Profile Credible Source Turns Over New Obama Identity Document Fraud Evidence
Posted on 04/06/2013 3:59:38 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
FULL INTERVIEW EMBEDDED BELOW: 8. I have enough evidence to drive a stake in the heart of this document 9. This investigation has been verified. 10. New evidence has been turned over to the Cold Case Posse within the last two days from other law enforcement. 12. People in high positions with standing have seen the evidence and others also are making arrangements to see it. 13. Promises have been made from people in high positions that the investigation will move forward.16. Lt. Zullo is working toward getting evidence before a DA or Attorney General. 18. Other sheriffs are interested in the investigation. 20. Lead Investigator Mike Zullo shines the light on the misinformation disinformation campaign being waged in an effort to try and discredit the investigation
and of which cant be done.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
It’s not possible that n’s of such different sizes could have from the same typewriter.
If you actually believe that, you are an idiot. If you are just arguing it’s possible, for the sake of a usurper, then you are evil.
The fact that the BCs have never been ‘officially’ used for anything it begs the question - how do we know Obama has qualified under the simple age requirement of the Constitution?
I always thought an interesting tactic would be to challenge the age requirement in court - and then see what is offered up as evidence. Most people would just produce their BC. I bet they would not in this case.
If Obama was living as foreign student in the US he would not have had to register.
This would fit the pattern of the much discussed and hotly debated ‘naturalized Obama’ scenario based its timeline of a a 1983 naturalization.
The image shows a supposed document filled out in Hawaii in 1980. However, Obama was living in LA in between his freshman and sophomore years at Oxy in the summer of 1980 - not Hawaii.
In Obama's biographical book Dreams from My Father, on page 126 (click page number), Obama tells the account of Obama's mom telling him that some day it was intended that all three of them were to "return to Kenya", i.e., his father, mother, and Obama. Therefore to return somewhere you must have been there first. Thus all three of them were there before, i.e., when Obama was born.There is plenty of other accounts including first hand testimony of at least two people with whom the person known as BHO has told them he was born in Kenya.
There are NO documents existing that prove the person known as BHO was born in Hawaii. There is also NO person on this site that believes he was born in Hawaii other than you and perhaps the two Obots that have not been zotted yet.
The operative word is “believe”. You believe what you want, but without proof you won’t get anywhere. I served in the military. I have two DD 214s to prove it. The one from the early 1980s is typewritten. The one from 10 years ago is computer generated. Would I send them to you for analysis? No. You could find things not to believe.
Thanks for the clarification in regard to foreign students.
I haven’t seen the documentation that reveals BO lived in CA in summer of 1980. Can you save me some time and tell me where I can find it?
Which is a statement of fact.
And then again, if this thing breaks wide open and the usurper is proven to be a usurper then he NEVER was president so impeachment is not necessary.
Impeachment is ONLY for a LEGAL president not a usurper.
I don’t need to post squat to prove diddly to you. If you don’t like me block me. Otherwise have a nice day. Or whatever kind of day floats your boat.
“.....I served in the military. I have two DD 214s to prove it. The one from the early 1980s is typewritten......”
So ahead and post them here (after first “sanitizing” them somewhat). Don’t forget to “flatten” them this time.
“Obama had an international circle of friends - “a real eclectic sort of group,” says Vinai Thummalapally, who himself came from Hyderabad, India.”
“Thummalapally lived with Obama the summer of 1980. The two ran together daily, three miles in the early morning, often chatting about their dreams. Thummalapally wanted to start a business back home; Obama talked about helping people.”
Also, there are instances where 999-99-xxxx Social Security number associated with Obama while at Oxy. 999-99-xxxx numbers are used by foreign students who do not have US issued Social Security numbers.
So I can have my identity stolen? No thanks, troll.
So I can have my identity stolen? No thanks, troll.
So you say you have something to prove something you alleged but don’t want to post it to actually prove what you’re alleging. Some “proof” that is.
In this regard you’re kind of like Obama, aren’t you? You know-—”I have proof, but will not present it—just trust me.”
And you say I’m the one that’s a troll?
And if I posted it without the personal info, you’d just say it was fake. I don’t know you and don’t care if you believe me or not. I guess that’s the difference. Goodnight sir or ma’am.
Thanks for the CBS article. I never saw it before.
It was nauseating to read how wonderful Obama was portrayed
......a good student with a sharp mind and unshakable integrity.......”an unpretentious, down to earth, solidly middle-class guy who seemed somewhat more sophisticated than the average college student......He was an athletic guy. He was gifted in that regard,” said Carpenter. He also remembered Obama being “super bright.....”I want to get into public service,” he recalls Obama saying. “I want to write and help people who are disadvantaged.” ........ Siddiqi fudged his credentials, saying he had a high-paying job at a catering company, but Obama “wanted no part of it. He put down the truth.”......Siddiqi said his female friends thought Obama was “a hunk.”
There was no author mentioned on the article. I wonder if Obama wrote it himself.
Goodnight sir or maam.
Goodnight, Barack compadre.
The MSM has written what they are given. Go look for the marriage date of Lolo and Stanley Ann. Time and other MSM outlets documented it dozens of times as 1967. But it was not. It was 1965 and fairly easily to validate. They never did.
Why is 1967 better than 1965? Think Hague Convention.
Perot led to a deep schism in my family ... and of course I consider him a destructive SOB who waltzed Clinton into the WH.
HOWEVER, considered now by the cold light of dawn, the evil little dweeb was right on the money. Would he have made any difference in the current state of affairs ???? Well, probably at least in comparison to the economically illiterate Tan Trotsky who somehow wound up in the top spot, yes Sir. Other than that, since we're sinking faster than the pumps can handle, we haven't the time for idle speculation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.