Posted on 04/06/2013 3:59:38 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
FULL INTERVIEW EMBEDDED BELOW: 8. “I have enough evidence to drive a stake in the heart of this document” 9. This investigation has been verified. 10. New evidence has been turned over to the Cold Case Posse within the last two days from other law enforcement. 12. People in high positions with standing have seen the evidence and others also are making arrangements to see it. 13. Promises have been made from people in high positions that the investigation will move forward.16. Lt. Zullo is working toward getting evidence before a DA or Attorney General. 18. Other sheriffs are interested in the investigation. 20. Lead Investigator Mike Zullo shines the light on the misinformation disinformation campaign being waged in an effort to try and discredit the investigation…and of which can’t be done.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
“Who was he referring to having fled the country?”
Thanks for reminding me about that. It was a woman and her child, I think he said. The woman feared for her safety. Something to look into. I don’t recall any particular woman who could have had information that could expose Barry’s eligibility or the BC forgery or cover-up of the forgery...or knowledge of Barry’s identity in NYC in 1981?
His former white girlfriend in Australia(?)...who might know about Barry’s connection to the Kathy Boudin Brink’s truck robbery?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brink%27s_robbery_%281981%29
[The essay in the link is written in first person narrative to liberals, but is also for conservatives.]
Nobama is under scrutiny for using fake SSN’s. The paper trail will lead to it.
Gallups took a call from a Fogblower pushing John Woodman’s claims to have debunked Zullo’s evidence of forgery.
It might have even been one of our recent Fogblowers on eligibility threads. Sure sounded like it.
Zullo talked around the issue of how “debunkers” think that they can refute the Posse’s case proving forgery by successfully attacking one claim. I suspect that he may have been talking about the ‘9’ pencil marks and the date of the coding book. That does appear to have been a mistake by Zullo, a mistake that he made in relying on Corsi’s representations which overstated the evidence.
Zullo and Gallups both have made dismissive comments about working with “people trying to sell books” and instead have emphasized that this is now a criminal investigation.
Zullo got dinged by some Obot critics for collecting a tiny amount per copy with Corsi from publishing copies of the first big press conference.
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
It’s painfully obvious that you missed the thousand-some odd post thread on Bath-House Barry’s ineligibility back in 2008.
(you don’t get paid for commenting on this topic, do you?)
Who?
Nancy Pelosi?
For, in essence, swearing that Hussein met the Constitutional qualification requirements for a presidental candidate with no proof. None.
Just the "trust me" variety.
“At this point even if Osama Obama *admits* that he’s not constitutionally qualified to be President he’ll remain in office until January ‘17.”
The focus of Zullo’s investigation is document forgery, which he claims is now 100% verified by a laboratory certified to testify in federal court.
If only on state AG came forward to press charges, Barry could beat that person down, I suspect. But it three state AGs come out together with some VIP backing, it could get traction.
As Gallups points out on the tape only after the forgery is demonstrated in court or shown to be likely to be proved can removal of Barry be contemplated.
Remember that Nixon was never impeached but he was “removed from office” by being forced out when the political class including man in his own party told him he would likely be impeached.
Unlike the false claim with Clinton, this case is not “just about sex” it is about criminal conspiracy to fraudulently place a usurper in office and covering it up.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
Get the joke? No? OK. When did
Impeachment work? Was there even a trial for Bubba Krintong? (I don’t remember) Or was the vote not to hold a trial? Whatever. Why wasn’t there a trial for Nixon (whatever you think of the circumstances, I’m talking about the procedure and the mechanism, not the nasty politics of it.) Why was he allowed to escape a trial? A flawed system if you asked me.
“What is the stupidest thing a president has ever done?”
?????
With Barry, where would you begin?
Since this thread is about the forged BC, I would guess that the unforced error of publishing a forged BC and failing to “flatten the file” could rank right up there with “stupidest thing.”
Spoken like a true Soros operative via DU.
It's impossible to prove a negative. But it IS possible to prove where he was born.
That Hussein has chosen not to, in an authoritative manner, to include all school records just underscores the total fraud.
Can you prove he wasn't born Havana Cuba?
Nope. Read the link.
If Zulu ever does get through the shield of deceit and Obama was going to be impeached then guess what would happen.
Obama would resign.
Biden would be sworn in.
And Biden would pardon Obama.
Think Nixon.
Obama will never be impeached.
So you’re telling us that the entire ‘new evidence’ Zullo presentation is based upon the July 2012 presentation? ... I asked if there is video of Zullo’s recent Washington presentation. Apparently that isn’t intelligible.
Jonah Vark said:
“...My children had to provide their college transcripts in order to get a job....”
I had to do the same for my job apps.
Butterdezillion,
another aspect to the whole thing, although its not directly birth cert related it IS job app related
.
Heh.
Okay, I finally found and lsitened to the Gallup interview from Friday with Mike Zullo. It certainly sounds like things are about to come to a head, but I still wonder how this is ever going to end up in a criminal court case if the legislators who took oaths to uphold our Constitution and therefore rule of law continue to violate that oath and be complicit in the criminality of little barry bastard boy? There isn’t a Sheriff in America who would walk up to the White Hut gate and show a warrant for little bastard’s arrest, and the ones who would run an impeachment trial are already vioolating their oath the Constitution that would need enforcing, so how does all this bring Bastard Barry Soetoro up on charges? Until A Gowdy steps forward in Congress, to confront this verminous lying fraud, men like West will continue to put their career desires above the nations law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.