Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York's assault weapon registration begins under NY SAFE Act
WSTM-TV / The Associated Press ^ | April 15, 2013

Posted on 04/16/2013 1:53:46 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Key measures of New York's tough new gun law have kicked in, meaning owners of firearms now reclassified as assault weapons are required to register their guns. There are also new limits on the number of bullets allowed in magazines.

The new provisions took effect Monday. New York's affiliate of the National Rifle Association says it expects to ask a federal judge late in the afternoon to immediately halt the magazine limit. The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association says the law violates the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens "to keep commonly possessed firearms."

Association president Tom King says they are advising members to obey the law until it's proven unconstitutional....

(Excerpt) Read more at cnycentral.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: assaultweaponsban; awb; banglist; bloodoftyrants; cuomo; democrats; govtabuse; guncontrol; libertyordeath; nazistate; newyork; policestate; resist; secondamendment; tyranny; waronliberty; wewillnotcomply; youwillnotdisarmus

1 posted on 04/16/2013 1:53:46 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Association president Tom King says they are advising members to obey the law until it’s proven unconstitutional....

That’s his first mistake. So he needs to go.


2 posted on 04/16/2013 2:20:32 AM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising.... Civil War II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

step one.


3 posted on 04/16/2013 2:35:08 AM PDT by RC one (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The kicker is, this gun grab is orchestrated by a moslem communist (possibly of foreign origin), who’s using a stolen SS# from a deceased CT woman.

The NRA should say “We’ll discuss whatever you want, as soon as you explain why you’ve been using a stolen CT social security number.”

The dirty moslem would shut up quick if more folks responded that way in public.


4 posted on 04/16/2013 2:48:23 AM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sooooo

How many people rushed rushed RUSHED to comply?

Any word?


5 posted on 04/16/2013 3:55:04 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder
"How many people rushed rushed RUSHED to comply? Any word?"

I have spoken with several - massive non-compiance seems to be the order of the day.

Us Konnecticut patriots stand with our New York State cousins: "We will not comply".

6 posted on 04/16/2013 4:08:13 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

blomey need to take a good look at nail guns that shoot deadly nails and can fire more then ten nails withoug reloading. (he needs to think outside the box on this) why is he not trying to protect wood?????? Where are his tree huggers????? hmmmmmmmm


7 posted on 04/16/2013 8:18:57 AM PDT by DaBearOne (she is always with us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

>> “How many people rushed rushed RUSHED to comply? Any word?”
> I have spoken with several - massive non-compiance seems to be the order of the day.
> Us Konnecticut patriots stand with our New York State cousins: “We will not comply”.

I don’t think mere non-compliance is enough.


8 posted on 04/16/2013 10:26:05 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
"I don’t think mere non-compliance is enough."

I hear a lot of this on FR lately - y'all need to think deeply on what you're impying.
Our Founding Fathers spoke of revolution as being a last-ditch effort - that as long as we still had free elections and a working judiciary, then we must work through that process.

I know it's popular to shout: "grab your guns and take over the government" while at your key-board, and we may very well be getting close, but take a loooong deep breath first.

9 posted on 04/16/2013 10:39:12 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
Our Founding Fathers spoke of revolution as being a last-ditch effort - that as long as we still had free elections and a working judiciary, then we must work through that process.

Do you honestly think we have a working Judiciary? The 1919 USSC case Schenick absolutely declared that the 1st Amendment did not prohibit Congress from making law respecting speech/publication. Now, before you say it was 'overturned' take a look at the overturning case: does it say that the 1st Amendment is absolute, or merely impose some new/"higher" standard of acceptableness for justification? What about Wickard? There they declared that intrastate commerce was regulatable under the interstate commerce clause... and Raich expanded that to say that no-commerce was regulatable under the commerce-clause (basically under an "if it was sold then it would be commerce" argument). What about Roe v. Wade where the Judiciary said "hey we can invent new rights and use them to invalidate all States's laws on the subject!", or Affordable Care Act where they said "we can rewrite the law!"

Hell, in my personal experience I've been told --in two different states-- that I cannot challenge a contraconstitutional statute without violating it and therefore being forced into a position of weakness: the accused. Indeed, even accepting that and violating the 'statute' in order to challenge it is an implicit acknowledgement of the legitimacy of the statute.

I know what I'm implying.

10 posted on 04/16/2013 11:05:36 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DaBearOne

This isn’t New York City but New York State so it’s Governor Andrew Cuomo and his minions, not Mayor Bloomberg.


11 posted on 04/16/2013 11:49:15 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson