Skip to comments.Vanity: If Jihadists admitted to the bombing and blamed Obama, would we ever find out?
Posted on 04/16/2013 5:24:24 AM PDT by varyouga
Let's say some Jihad group already sent their admission/demands to the White House, CBS, NBC, etc.
Let's say they blamed Obama for drone strikes killing civilians in their home country.
Does anyone here honestly think we would find out?
It would be "blacked out" and the Jihadists secretly silenced so the MSM can continue their "right-wing white guy upset about taxes" programming
The likelihood we’ll ever know the truth is slim in the extreme.
Base all judgments on what you hear and see reported based on that knowledge.
Obama kept saying over and over in his stump speeches: “Al Qaeda is ON THE RUN.”
If it is Al Qaeda, perhaps they decided to take the symbolism of his words literally, and that’s why they chose to attack the most prestigious RUNNING race in America.
If the perpetrator(s) are - even in the most obscure manner - connected with the Right, we’ll hear about it from now until doomsday.
If they are connected with the Left, or with islam... not so much. In fact, within a year or two, the whole thing will be swept under the rug and forgotten by John Q. Random.
Just like 9-11 has been.
In either case, we will lose a bit more of our freedom.
He won’t be able to block something like that but he’ll try.
you have to fight for the truth if you want it.
“secretly silenced” = paid off with cash and weapons
Zer0 could have planted the bombs and triggered them himself and the media would do a story on why it was Bush’s fault.
bigmak007 mentioned African Liberation Day on one of his posts and linked a JFK site.
I did a little search for possible connection and here is what I found.
How is this for a possible culprit?
“15th of April.. African Liberation Day 2013”
Is it possible these are the people behind the Boston Marathon Massacre?
If they are, they are Hard Left Anti-Capitalist Anti-Jew Anti-anything to do with Whitie.
Could be funny. But they don't do "funny" anymore.
It would go viral immediately
You’d get it from BBC, or, at last resort, Pravda.
The BBC, despite being a commie cesspit, is still pretty good about actually publishing news...
I'd look for Pravda, Izvestia, and Russia Today ahead of the BBC, there is that much a reversal in the Eastern/Western media roles today.
They are just waiting for a jihadist to claim he was working on behalf of the Tea Party.
Once they have that claim the MSM will report that islamist began working with the Tea Party, before 9/11.
You might say that can’t happen since the Tea Party has only been around since 2009.
The MSM will simply say 2009 is when they first exposed the Tea Party, but it had been operating in secret since before 9/11 as revealed by (anonymous) high level gov’t officials.
One might say this satirical...perhaps
For what its worth I too would at the very least give an outside the country news source a bit more attention.
The MSM in America has been in bed so long with certain political influences they dare not lose their sleeping partner, and they will do anything to maintain the status quo, which means spending a lot of money and man power scrubbing the web and re-writing history plus the daily smoke, mirrors and snipe hunts, anything but the simple obvious solution, anything but the truth.
Yes. But the a$$ clown enabling propogandists will report them as the “right wing, conservative branch of Al Qaeda”...
No. The government and press are 1) in cahoots and 2) completely compromised.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.