To: LD Jackson
I like the idea of the march, but maybe they could use pitchforks instead. Would get the same point across, with loads of symbolism. Obama did threaten that there would be people marching with pitchforks, but he thought it would be in order to harm bankers.
posted on 05/05/2013 9:33:43 AM PDT
(If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
To: Defiant; everyone
In the zer0 world of D.C. am not certain pitchforks would obtain a marching permit. D.C. is on edge. My thought for the reason D.C. is on edge is they know the People have figured out what D.C. is up to and realize the People know their representatives are not doing the Peoples’ business but are instead doing other nations’ business against the People. Imho, this would give D.C. plenty of reasons to go ahead and finish the People. Imho, the People are holding their own for the moment. The Senate did not pass the first step of registration of firearms. As long as this holds and the Supreme Court does not hand down a 5 - 4 decision against firearms ownership there is a reason to march but not in the fashion being proposed. Should a 5 - 4 decision be handed down in the Supreme Court against firearm ownership or should Congress enact legislation requiring firearm registration it would then be time (imho) to march with pitchforks, tar and feathers. Till then ... I pray the People will not do something stupid. We should wait till the Supreme Court or Congress does something stupid first (imho).
posted on 05/05/2013 9:49:03 AM PDT
(Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
...they could use pitchforks instead.
Tar, feathers and a fence rail would be appropriate, too.
posted on 05/06/2013 6:15:17 AM PDT
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson