Not that I know of. The question was put like this: Shall we exclude some boys from partaking of the Blessings of BSA activities? How would it be acceptable to tell a young boy that he is not welcome in the Boy Scouts. All boys should be welcome. The motto of “morally straight” is one that will continue to be in effect and the LDS-led troops will not fail. Meanwhile, gay scout leaders are not acceptable because they are ADULTS who are charged with awesome responsibilities to maintain the upright tenets of the BSA.
Leave the definition as it has been for years.
That was perfect.
That is not what happened. The definition was changed, and my point is, the LDS was a force behind the change. Is that not the fact? My point is it appears to be, the LDS contributed to that change.
If that is not the fact, then they as a major influence should reverse this pig-headed stupidity right now.
Not that I know of. The question was put like this: Shall we exclude some boys from partaking of the Blessings of BSA activities?
Yes. Little animal torturers, budding arsonists, and those who identify as “gay”, for starters.
Once someone identifies as "gay" they are publicly declaring that they are not morally straight.
Do the mormons not accept the bible as scripture? Yet the bible is blatant and consistent in it's denounciation of this behavior. Going so far as say that homosexuals do not inherit the kingdom of God (that is, all homos go to hell)
How can any group that claims to follow Jesus Christ justify publicly embracing that which HE calls abomination?
So to welcome all boys they would have to take an oath of each boy that they are not 'gay'. I don't think many boys who identify as 'gay' would take such an oath (or if they did they would lie and then continue their predations of inncoent younger boys).