And where in that sequence does his blog become a needful element?
Why not link to the article and comment here?
In what way does this diminish ANY message?
How does this accomplish any nefarious end, removing a useless link from the info chain?
Seems to me it does nothing but provide more undiluted content, devoid of third party commentary.
Which commentary, by the way, could be made right here before a greater audience.
SO I ask..
Where does homeboy's blog fit in as a needful element?
“Why not link to the article and comment here?”
Why, because you say so? Because you are so impotent and ignorant you don’t even see THE SAME THING HAPPENING when news sites YOU INSIST HE POSTS FROM do the same thing, BUT DONT LINK TO THEIR SOURCES?
When he links to his blog he provides people on FR, (as well as people who are not on FR) with an opportunity to see what ELSE that he, as a Conservative, thinks is important, vs what THE LIBERALS ON THE ORIGINAL SITE think is important.
Unlike YOU, who thinks that THE LIBERAL SITE deserves the direct link.
Face it, you have no clue what a blog is, and you are just a curmudgeon
You can’t tell us the difference between his little blog, WND, Michelle Malkin, Hot Air, SteynOnline, CNN’s or the WSJ’ “blog”, Wordpress, etc.
All you know is “I haven’t gone to the bathroom this morning, this guy is posting something not from a major news site, I need to drop my pants and crap on that post!!”
You regularly whine about another Freeper who lives in Israel and posts stories from the MOST CONSERVATIVE, ENGLISH LANGUAGE website from Israel, you whine about his and other’s posts from the ONLY, NON-GOVT, ENGLISH LANGUAGE translation source of jihadi TV, you whine when Conservatives post about jihadi rape, you might as well be a liberal jihadi!
As far as Stumble bummer is concerned, anything that moves the discussion away from jihadi rape is a good thing!