I didn't see any insisting. I saw a question.
Did you see something else?
When he links to his blog he provides people on FR, (as well as people who are not on FR) with an opportunity to see what ELSE that he, as a Conservative, thinks is important
How is that accomplished better on his blog than here on FR?
Unlike YOU, who thinks that THE LIBERAL SITE deserves the direct link.
Well.. check the body of the thread. It's their content.
You regularly whine about another Freeper who lives in Israel and posts stories from the MOST CONSERVATIVE, ENGLISH LANGUAGE website from Israel, you whine about his and others posts from the ONLY, NON-GOVT, ENGLISH LANGUAGE translation source of jihadi TV, you whine when Conservatives post about jihadi rape, you might as well be a liberal jihadi!
I regularly do a lot of things.
Epic whineage, by the way.
As far as Stumble bummer is concerned, anything that moves the discussion away from jihadi rape is a good thing!
Yes, citing the source of the stolen material is absolutely key in obstructing jihadi rape. Always has been.
“How is that accomplished better on his blog than here on FR?”
He gets to expose FR readers to his variety of contextual interests, as well as non-FR readers.
THATS WHAT BLOGGING IS PARTIALLY ABOUT, if you had ANY lue what blogging is.
“Well.. check the body of the thread. It’s their content.”
a/ NO it’s NOT, stupid, because they got it from Swedish Radio.
b/ Almost EVERYTHING here is from some other original source.
SEE YA, DISTRACTOR OF JIHADI RAPE.