Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Syncro
I will address one of your points.

First you say that "Sarah could be a powerful media draw"--as if she isn't---And then you go on to say when she appeared on one of the Main Stream News morning shows, "She caused GMA to murder The Today Show in the ratings"

Of course she is a powerful media draw, that was the point.

This thread is about Sarah having to take Twitter to call our Rubio on Amnesty.

At the present time,no one is employing her media drawing power because she does not have the favored position on Amnesty which is held by ALL the media elites.

Fox News is scared of her power, that is why they have hired her back, and kept away from prime time and discussing Amnesty.

If Amnesty passes, I am sure that we will see a lot more of Sarah on the Fox News Channel and in prime time.

Fox News Channel has pulled out the stops for Amnesty.

Rubio appears almost exclusively on Hannity.

Bill O' Reilly threw in with Gang of Eight.

Huckabee gave an interview to the Washington Post endorsing amnesty.

And Sarah has to take to Twitter to take on Rubio, because NO ONE is taking on Rubio on the Fox News Channel at least during prime time.

95 posted on 06/23/2013 5:03:35 PM PDT by metafugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: metafugitive; Dr. Zoo
I will address one of your points.

Oh I am so honored, thank you very much!

Of course she is a powerful media draw, that was the point.

Yes, it was, your point was different.

This thread is about Sarah having to take Twitter to call our Rubio on Amnesty.

No, this thread is about what Palin said.

You want to make it seem that it only appeared on twitter and so marginalize Palin because you bow to the overlords at the MSM.

Twitter, facebook, freerepublic, breitbart, twitchy, phenomonolgy.com and numerous other sites are combined many times more effective and informative then your MSM morning shows.

The rest of your "revelations" have been known on this website from the very beginning of when each of them hit the universe.

How long did you glean information from FR before you signed up so you could sound so, well, gosh darned informed?

Please don't do me the honor of addressing any more points that I made so eloquently. Which if you would have been standing up they wouldn't have gone so far over your head.

109 posted on 06/23/2013 5:39:04 PM PDT by Syncro ("So?" - -Andrew Breitbart --The King of All Media RIP Feb 1, 1969 – Mar 1, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: metafugitive

Metafugitive is correct.

Palin is a force of nature. Part of the problem with Palin being with FNC is that it’s up to Ailes as to when Sarah can go on with FOX.

Palin is foursquare against Amnesty, so they won’t put her on Prime Time.

She will have to take to Twitter and Public Speaking, which they can’t control.


139 posted on 06/24/2013 7:10:34 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson