Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

At the very least the military should have female personnel investigate. Men who may not want women in the military may decide to allow sexual harassment to discourage women from joining the military. I wonder what the public reaction would be to allowing prostitutes on military bases.
1 posted on 06/23/2013 1:56:16 PM PDT by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: kathsua
here's an idea: keep women out.
2 posted on 06/23/2013 1:56:56 PM PDT by schm0e ("we are in the midst of a coup.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

It isn’t about controlling men’s sex drives, it is about recognizing the kind of sex drives young athletic and virile young men possess.

Anyone who knows about the military recognizes that foreign brothels benefit mightily from the truth of this. Turning a blind eye to it and placing young women in front of these men is like waving a red cape in front of a bull.


4 posted on 06/23/2013 1:59:44 PM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

We have watched how this works for 40 years, the female standard of acceptable behavior, becomes the government imposed standard on human behavior.


6 posted on 06/23/2013 2:08:20 PM PDT by ansel12 (Libertarians, Gays = in all marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

“Winning wars requires using men, and women, who don’t always play well with others. “

Stopped reading right there.


7 posted on 06/23/2013 2:09:59 PM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Any effort to reduce sexual harassment in the military needs to recognize that some men have never learned to adequately control their sex drives. Unfortunately, the military may need many of these men for their military related skills. Winning wars requires using men, and women, who don’t always play well with others. Thus, the military may need to find a way to reduce sex assaults while keeping those who have trouble controlling their zippers.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

This first paragraph is such a load - I hardly know where to start. “Unfortunately, the military may need...”

WTF is unfortunate about a testosterone driven man reaady to engage the enemy? If the military wants weak-kneed pu$$ies (and apparently they do) then they can continue to recruit the queers.

Here’s an idea. QUIT trying to force women into combat roles.

If the military truly wanted to reduce sex assaults, they could respect the gender roles of men and women and not toss them both into the mix.

Geez. That first paragraph was so blatantly stupid - do I dare read any futher?


8 posted on 06/23/2013 2:12:08 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
At the very least the military should have female personnel investigate. Men who may not want women in the military may decide to allow sexual harassment to discourage women from joining the military. I wonder what the public reaction would be to allowing prostitutes on military bases.

What garbage.

9 posted on 06/23/2013 2:14:41 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

You posted this garbage, you’d better defend it.


11 posted on 06/23/2013 2:15:56 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

In the past, prostitutes were not allowed on bases. They were located at clubs off bases. But, with recent DOD rules, anybody visiting brothels could be prosecuted for human trafficking and other offenses.

I think the most effective solution would be to have an all-male, homosexual-free military. But, that is not going to happen.

Barring that, I think training which emphasizes respect for the opposite sex and separate living and bathing facilities is the only way to reduce the incidence of sexual assault. However, the military already does that, so I don’t see what the big fuss is all about then. If during IGs, commanders are found to be not enforcing the law, these commanders than could be relieved of command and subject to punishment under the UCMJ.


12 posted on 06/23/2013 2:18:47 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Have you ever served in the military?


14 posted on 06/23/2013 2:19:54 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

My advice to Christians is to stay out of the military. It is decidedly anti-Christian these days.

Some of the rapes going on now are men on men. I don’t know what the percentage is, but a lot of young men are sharing the rape experience with young women in the military.

My suggestion is that the military return the institute of firing squads to handle rapists. Help society get rid of scum and gang members.


15 posted on 06/23/2013 2:41:17 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
"I wonder what the public reaction would be to allowing prostitutes on military bases?"

We already have that, including "women" on submarines.....they make a ton of extra money there.

16 posted on 06/23/2013 2:42:46 PM PDT by traditional1 (Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

No one has offered the slightest hint of proof that sexual harassment or assault is worse in the military than in the outside world. I keep hearing that 90% of the crimes go unreported. If they’re unreported then HOW DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THEM? Please enlighten us on this clairvoyance that you have on this subject.

Second off, every senior commander who hasn’t defended his/her subordinates and identified this witch-hunt for what it is should be immediately fired. The NSA has their cell phone, e-mail, and internet records, they should look for the search term “FEMDOM”. I’m sure it’s heavily used because these commanders sure are submissive. I’m sure not seeing a whole lot of commanding going on here.


17 posted on 06/23/2013 2:43:31 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Wow, political correctness has consequences.

Gee, who would of thought.


18 posted on 06/23/2013 2:45:21 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

“I wonder what the public reaction would be to allowing prostitutes on military bases. “

Um, they ARE there. So?


19 posted on 06/23/2013 2:48:04 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
Of the 26,000 reported sexual assaults in 2012, 14,000 were MALE ON MALE.

This is the sole cause of the recent spike.

Also, women who claim to have been sexually assaulted (whether it happened or not) will be granted "PTSD" disability status and a lifetime of monthly checks from the VA. Massive motive exists for fraudulent accusations. Civilianizing courtmartials over this will do nothing but help Obama continue his purge of Christian patriots from the military, and put their futures in the hands of hand picked feminist judges.

I personally know a girl who did this. She just finished a bachelor's degree on taxpayer dime under "vocational rehab" through the VA.

22 posted on 06/23/2013 2:54:39 PM PDT by SENTINEL (Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

The assumption in all of these stories is that sexual harassment is completely male on female. What about male on male, or female on female, even female on male. Note that the rise in reported incidents of sexual harassment is coincident with the demise of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. Many homosexuals are sexual predators and they have just been turned loose in the candy store.


24 posted on 06/23/2013 2:57:01 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
I wonder what the public reaction would be to allowing prostitutes on military bases.

Yeah, there's a great plan. If you allow prostitutes on base, you're encouraging drug use and STDs. There's no way around that.

I'll give you props for hitting all the stereotypes here. In my military experience (which you obviously have none), the wives and girlfriends back home screw around A LOT more than the guys do.

How do you live with yourself?

25 posted on 06/23/2013 2:58:56 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

There is a very simple way to deal with this issue.

No sex between active duty military members, whatever their sex, gender, self-perception, or other flavor of the week. Make sex between members a criminal offense, as the military already does with adultery. It should be a felony in peacetime, like adultery, but a very serious felony during wartime or a deployment in a combat zone.

No need for touchy-feely classes on what this or that sex or gender might consider an offensive proposition, no specially trained investigators needed either.

Ban sex in military and lock up everyone engaged in it. Military already married to military members might have to be “grand-fathered” as offensive as that term might be to some. But no more marriages should be allowed between military members after a certain date.

See how easy it is to solve the problem? Warriors don’t have sex with each other! Real simple.


27 posted on 06/23/2013 3:10:04 PM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Homosexuals are far more promiscuous then non-homosexuals. That is why sodomy is encouraged now in our military (Vice is now promoted through our “Justice” system)-—to destroy us from within. Marxists are in charge.

These immoral militaries will kill and mutilate and torture their own citizens including women and children-—since they dehumanize themselves regularly and others continually.....they have no moral compass and reduce man to fecal material.

All brutal, immoral militaries were homosexual—from the Spartans/Samurai/Nazi Brownshirts/Bolsheviks, etc

There should be females in the military-—but only as they were allowed in WWII. Women are not interchangeable with men—never. Our Constitution is based on the Laws of Nature which claims women and men are different and can not be treated the same.

Same with Vice. Strict guidelines need to be enforced which discourages all Vice-—especially sodomy. Otherwise, we will end up with a Brownshirt military.

http://www.thepinkswastika.com/5294/index.html


29 posted on 06/23/2013 3:38:45 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

One logical way to reduce sexual harassment is to ban Homosexuals. Another is to ban women who are not emotionaly equipted to suffer war. The fact that sexual harassment has greatly increased since bringing women into the Military in front line positions and doubled since bringing in sexual perverts is also telling.

But that would be logical.


34 posted on 06/23/2013 4:18:12 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson