Skip to comments.Top 150 Conservative Websites Announced
Posted on 06/23/2013 3:53:26 PM PDT by NOBO2012
And at Number 129, up 9 steps from #138 in February is (Drum Roll Please)...
Big Hugs and Thanks to all My MOLs, MODs, MYLs, MYDs, FOMs and all the wonderful people who link to my little blog on their websites and in comments around the intertubes!!!
Special thanks to Doug Ross who tirelessly compiles the rankings and Linx to me regularly!!!
Come Over to Celebrate!!!
Occasionally the Looking Spoon as well.
But this is just a BS list to make the marginal sites feel good about themselves.
Noting that just because a web site is identified as being conservative, that does not mean that the constitutionally limited powers of the corrupt federal government are discussed regularly, if at all, as they are here at FR. So having a look at the relatively few Constitution-ignoring web sites that beet FR in the name of conservative hits, whatever conservative is supposed to mean, FR is #1 Constitution-respecting web site, imo, where fed's constitutionally limited powers are freely and regularly discussed.
Viennacon, I probably should dial into Drudge too.
One can find sites that can be real gems today. I used to live in Chicago and found a site I still hit everyday that is a blog by an active Chicago cop who constantly exposes the Chicago corruption and the racial attacks against whites in the wealthiest Chicago neighborhoods. All stories the local news propagandist misreport, distort or too afraid to cover.
I want to know more about Kirsten Dunst’s booze binges. Photos?
Last Thursday, I think it was, the op-ed page had an excellent column about the death panels--and how once they are in place no one will have any control over them, not the President, not Congress, not the courts. Scary.
This is a real question. Why is it so offensive to certain FReepers that conservative bloggers post about their blogs here? There are a lot of websites I wouldn't have found if I hadn't found them here. Back when we started Second Amendment Sisters on FR in 1999 to go up against the commie mommies, not one person accused us of pimping our little group here.
I would like to see people stop flaming our own. JR allows it, so no reason to muck up a thread with nasty comments. If there is some reason I don't know about why this is so offensive, then I'd like to know what it is.
I'll try to help you out.
Blog pimps come here to FR to... (drum roll) ...pimp their blogs, and for that purpose ONLY. That is, they hit and run. They pimp their blogs and disappear to the next site where they can pimp their stinking blog again, rinse and repeat. When you check the blog pimp's posting history you find they never (or almost never) respond to any posts directed to them, and they never participate in other discussions on other threads with other (genuine) freepers.
The only blog pimping that is acceptable (at least to me) is when somebody posts the ENTIRE column, article, or piece that is posted at the blog. ...Meaning, it's not really "blog pimping", since you don't have to go there to read the story. However, if you do like the story or the writing style or the cause, whatever, you can go check out the blog if you wish.
There are plenty of good bloggers who post their entire pieces here; most are active freepers who interact on other threads with other freepers about a variety of topics. Then there are bloggers like this scumbag.
Hope this helps your understanding.
No WorldNnet Daily on the list so it is a bit of a joke.