Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wal-Mart and Minimum Wage Chicken Hawks
Flopping Aces ^ | 07-14-13 | Brother Bob

Posted on 07/14/2013 10:44:44 AM PDT by Starman417

300px-Walmart_exterior1

Job killing leftists have chalked up another victory. Wal-Mart was looking to build three stores in Washington, DC, but the prostitutes serving Big Labor, aka the DC City Council, voted 8-5 to chase them away. What this came in the form of was a "Living Wage Bill", which was actually specifically targeted toward Wal-Mart. The bill forces retailers with over $1 billion in sales and stores occupying over 75,000 feet of pave to pay $12.50 per hour, as opposed to the $8.25 Washington, DC minimum wage. The Washington Post reported 

“The question here is a living wage; it’s not whether Wal-Mart comes or stays,” said council member Vincent B. Orange (D-At Large), a lead backer of the legislation, who added that the city did not need to kowtow to threats. “We’re at a point where we don’t need retailers. Retailers need us.”

What? Exactly what point is it that you feel the need to chase businesses away from a city that has 8.5% unemployment? We could also give Messr, Orange a basic lesson on economics that wages get determined by what you're worth, not what makes leftists happy. Entry level jobs pay less for a reason. And we could also point out that when a city suffers from high unemployment it's nothing to celebrate over when you shut down someone who is willing to risk their own money in your neighborhood to create jobs. $8.25 per hour is actually an exponentially better wage than the amount of zero that comes from not working. Fox News added that Wal-mart scrapped it's plans as a result, and also noted how this bill singled out Wal-Mart: 

Unionized businesses are exempt from the measure. Large stores that already have a presence in D.C., including Target (TGT) and Macy’s (M), have four years to comply.

That last part can be translated as an exemption that Macy's and Target will be allowed to keep in perpetuity provided they shovel enough money to the appropriate community groups dedicated to re-electing the DC council members.

One doesn't have to go far to see examples of leftists' selective outrage, whether it's in the privately owned Newseum's layoffs while their executives are paid quite well, or anti-Capitalist Senator Elizabeth Warren (D - Cherokee Nation) who pays her own interns a living wage of... zero.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bluezones; dc; dopeydems; urban; walmart

1 posted on 07/14/2013 10:44:44 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Since when is any State or DC have the right to set wages to a private company? Oh, forgot. Communists America.


2 posted on 07/14/2013 10:50:27 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Good! So when the folks are sitting home, jobless, they can look to their wise, elder town council, that they voted into office, and thank them!


3 posted on 07/14/2013 10:51:41 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
Unfortunately, the spin will be that unemployment is the fault of greedy Wal Mart. And these fools will buy it.
4 posted on 07/14/2013 10:54:32 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
“Good! So when the folks are sitting home, jobless, they can look to their wise, elder town council, that they voted into office, and thank them!”

Unfortunately I don’t think it’ll work that way. Especially with the way the media is.

5 posted on 07/14/2013 10:54:42 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
Unfortunately, the spin will be that unemployment is the fault of greedy Wal Mart. And these fools will buy it.
6 posted on 07/14/2013 10:54:52 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

If the mayor is smart he’ll veto this.


7 posted on 07/14/2013 10:59:42 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
$8.25 per hour is actually an exponentially better wage than the amount of zero that comes from not working.

Let see, collecting unemployment, welfare, food stamps, free medical, Obama phones, etc., and sit home on the one hand. On the other hand go to work every day and get $8.25/hr. They can't afford to work.

Secondly think like a marxist, consider the government/union jobs that will be lost when these people are no longer eligible for "entitlements". Consider the lost Democrat voters when these people have to pay taxes out of their own paychecks.

8 posted on 07/14/2013 11:01:51 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

“Brother Bob” is trying to stir up trouble where, maybe, there isn’t any.

Wal*Mart won’t do anything until Mayor Gray either passes or vetoes the bill.


9 posted on 07/14/2013 11:05:58 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

http://www.frumforum.com/the-lonely-life-of-a-dc-republican/

There has never been, nor will there ever be, a Republican mayor in DC. It is unlikely that the current mayor will veto this legislation as the minimum wage is all about sending more money to unions, not helping the poor. (Union contracts are set to multiples of the minimum wage, even though almost no union members make a wage so low.)


10 posted on 07/14/2013 11:11:40 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Unfortunately, the spin will be that unemployment is the fault of greedy Wal Mart. And these fools will buy it.

Highly likely in the Bizarro World where "Unemployment stimulates the economy." (Pelosi, D-LaLaLand)

11 posted on 07/14/2013 11:14:13 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

“We don’t need retailers. Retailers need us.”

Well, he’s not quite understanding certain things. People who reside in the District of Columbia currently drive to nearby Maryland and Virginia suburbs to shop at stores such as Target and Wal-Mart. The sales tax they pay stays in those jurisdictions. Among other benefits, D.C. would have gotten a great deal of sales tax revenue if Wal-Mart was located in the boundaries of the District of Columbia. Instead, if people go out of the District to shop, the District loses sales tax revenue.

Yes, while retailers need “us” or customers, Wal-Mart already benefits by attracting D.C. shoppers to their stores in Maryland or Virginia. The District is the loser, since they lose sales tax, property tax, income tax, and other tax revenue by the stores NOT being located in the District. This councilman is clearly not thinking about any of that.


12 posted on 07/14/2013 11:14:59 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

Depending the persons class and number of dependents its possible in some areas to make around $40k off govt handouts. At least I’ve read some stories of people who’ve figured out how to do it.


13 posted on 07/14/2013 11:22:24 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Unionized businesses are exempt from the measure. Large stores that already have a presence in D.C., including Target (TGT) and Macy’s (M), have four years to comply.

How long before Target or Macy's decide those store aren't profitable anymore, or remodel them to just under 75K SF?

14 posted on 07/14/2013 11:28:18 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
This is the best part... Washington D.C. doesn't get the 6 percent sales tax from all those sales at WalMart, and instead will lose it to the states that surround the district as customers are the ultimate arbitrators of where to shop...

Gosh, all those vote buying dollars gone... Oops.

15 posted on 07/14/2013 11:48:00 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

*laugh* Ahh, here’s the best part - To get to the nearest WalMart, District residents can take the subway to within a mile of the store. The cost to the District budget? $14.00 for the round trip per person. There you go, district hacks, not only do you miss out on sales tax income, it COSTS you every time someone decides to go to WalMart.


16 posted on 07/14/2013 11:54:18 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

“If the mayor is smart he’ll veto this.”

Unfortunately they have the votes to override a veto.


17 posted on 07/14/2013 1:02:08 PM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I would say that state laws on minimum wage has greater constitutional basis than Federal law. (Federal law, as I understand it, uses that elastic clause of “regulation of interstate commerce.”)

Now, if the store owner actually is a citizen of said state, requiring him to pay a higher wage than other store owners is not equal protection.

The rub is that D.C. is not a state.


18 posted on 07/14/2013 1:40:37 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
LOOK....who knows how to run a profitable multi national conglomerate better? the WALMART BOARD OF DIRECTORS or THE GENIUSES ON THE DC City Council?..... I rest my case:

TOADY SEZ:



LET THE COUNCIL DO IT BWAHAHAHA

19 posted on 07/14/2013 2:34:41 PM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Job killing leftists have chalked up another victory..I actually caught a woman analyst on RT the other day giving an impassioned tirade against the idea of minimum wage laws - all the facts you'd expect from a Tea Partier - minimum wages kill jobs, lead to inflation etc etc and the only way to improve the workers' situation is to improve the economy through efficiency and productiveness - Russian Television of all sources teaching US leftwingers the facts of life......
20 posted on 07/14/2013 3:31:56 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

fatnotlazy wrote:
“Unfortunately, the spin will be that unemployment is the fault of greedy Wal Mart. And these fools will buy it.”

(Sigh) Ya know, with five years empirical evidence staring me in the face, I would, begrudgingly agree, that you mighr be more correct than wrong!


21 posted on 07/15/2013 6:33:55 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
I live in a distressed town run by similar politicians with the same dopey folks who keep re-electing them again and again.

True story: Some years ago, the feds offered this town a chunk of money to make improvements to the long-neglected business district. Obtaining that money would have involved some paperwork. The officials didn't want to spend time on the paperwork, so they turned down the money. Just amazing.

22 posted on 07/15/2013 9:42:56 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson