Chris Matthews: Rand Paul Will Be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2016

Newsbusters ^ | 08/08/2013 | Noel Shepphard

[SeekAndFind]

MSNBC's Chris Matthews made a bold prediction on Wednesday's Hardball.

"The hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 and the nomination is going to Rand Paul" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with this. I’ve been offering a prediction of late. Let me nail it down now. I believe the Republican Party is going to go hard-right in 2016. It’s going to run someone from the growing hard-right wing of the Party, something it hasn't done since 1980. And here's the thinking which works equally well for the Democrats.

Parties as you've noticed face a conflict every four years. Should they run someone who represents their strongest passions right or left, or do they run someone who appeals to the middle? Most of the time they head to the middle. And this is what Republicans did most successfully in 1952 when after 20 years of FDR and Harry Truman, they wanted back in the White House. They ran the General who received the Nazi surrender. And guess what? They won. In 1956 and ’60, they stuck to the middle with Ike the second time, and then with Richard Nixon.

In '64 the right said it was its turn and blew the roof off the Cow Palace in San Francisco mocking Republican moderates and liberals like New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller. Then getting killed with Barry Goldwater running against Lyndon Johnson.

The Democrats ran moderates in ’60 and ’64 and ’68, but then went wild in '72 and ran anti-Vietnam warrior George McGovern of South Dakota. That's the year the Democrats got killed.

And so then the pendulum goes. The party bases get pushed aside for several elections and finally build up like steam much like a volcano and come roaring to the surface. Obama won in 2008 over Hillary Clinton because the opponents of the Iraq war had had it with the party leaders who played it safe and backed the war.

I believe the Republican base will do the same in 2016. They put up with George Bush the first, put up with Bob Dole, were deeply disappointed with the big-spending George W, and last year again by Mitt Romney, and are now going to come loaded for bear for the race for 2016.

So I predict the hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 and the nomination is going to Rand Paul. You watch. This is what I do for a living.

I'm quite sure there are a lot of conservatives that hope Matthews is right for a change.

Stay tuned.

[BenLurkin]

“The Democrats ran moderates in ’60 and ’64 and ’68”

That is so much cr@p.

Maybe JFK was a “moderate” Maybe.

But LBJ and Humphrey were both HUGE Nanny State lefties.

[PGR88]

What? it won’t be Chris Christie?

But its his turn!

/s

[Mr. K]

No, it will be Palin/Paul

(If I have anything to say about it)

for 16 years of conservative bliss

[Quickgun]

Well... we could do worse than Rand...we already have done worse..Much worse...

[InterceptPoint]

We could do worse. An actual candidate who is eligible according to the Constitution. What a concept.

(With apologies to Ted Cruz who I admire greatly - could be a great president if we are willing to look the other way on the Constitutional requirements for the Presidency).

[Third Person]

Rand to the rescue?

[Georgia Girl 2]

OK with me.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

"The hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 ..

Which would be like the hard-right taking over the Democrat party, same thing, which means no way in hell - which is why we need a new party.

[SMARTY]

How does Matthews know this? Did he get a tingle up his leg or something?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Well... we could do worse than Rand...we already have done worse..Much worse...

I don’t know.... replace the name “Rand Paul” with “Marco Rubio” and we get a huge number of FReepers shouting “Traitor” !!

But I don’t read that word being posted in this thread at all.

Doesn’t anybody realize that Rand Paul is sympathetic to some form of amnesty as well?

SEE HERE:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3029582/posts

[Resolute Conservative]

How does he explain Reagan? He wasn’t moderate.

[Zathras]

DNC Decoder:
“We are in serious trouble...all troops target Rand Paul”

[meangene]

Chris who?

:)

[jimfree]

That would be just fine with me.

[Responsibility2nd]

There’s no need to look the other way.

Any presidential eligibility questions we may have had are now gone. The issue has been settled. Constitutionally settled.

Hundreds of lower courts have decided Obama is a Natural Born Citizen. The SCOTUS validated that by not reviewing it.

What else is there to say? Except...

Cruz/Whoever - 2016.

[GBA]

With Cruz as Senate Majority Leader, putting the Senate on "Cruz Control", plus a Constitution loving and following President, we could be in a very good place once more!

We would finally be heading in the right direction again, toward the health and prosperity that are our birthrights when we honor our founding documents and follow our Judeo-Christian philosophy and heritage.

[Old Sarge]

Chris Matthews: Rand Paul Will Be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2016

Old Sarge: Chrissy Tingles can paint herself magenta and hurl her arse from the center span of the Verrazano Narrows before I ever listen to what she has to say!

[Sooth2222]

Since Chris Matthews is never right about anything, I doubt it.

Based on their recent record, the Republicans might nominate Hillary Clinton.

Or they might as well.

[pgkdan]

For once I agree with Chrissy and hope he’s right.

[EricT.]

That would get my vote.

Otherwise, I don’t see anyone else testing the GOP waters who I would vote for.

[Forgotten Amendments]

The MSM and neocons are going to DESTROY Rand Paul. If he makes a serious run there will be stories about him eating Jewish babies at Klan rallies. They’ve already started. They tried in Kentucky ... but he survived there. He’s going to be a distant memory by 2016.

[Vinnie]

No complaints from me. Probably #2 on my wish list. Just below Palin.

[GBA]

No, they haven't.

Make Canadian born Cruz your nomination and you'll see what else there is to say.

I definitely won't vote for him to be President, not unless we are having another Revolution because the Constitution is truly dead.

But...he's definitely eligible for Senate leader! And, he'd do a lot of good for the Constitution and the nation he claims as his home in that position.

The choice is: use him for what he is eligible for or sacrifice him and your integrity.

[Forgotten Amendments]

Based on their recent record, the Republicans might nominate Hillary Clinton.

I say Bob Dole. And for the gender gap - Bush. Barbara Bush.

[mykroar]

I could live with that, but I have a feeling the GOPe will foist Chrispie or Jeb on us.

[BenLurkin]

Creeps like Matthews have no clue what “hard-right” means. In order for anyone to be “hard-right” they would have to side by side on the political spectrum with hadr-left. In other words a socialist statist.

[Hotlanta Mike]

No tingles for you, Matthews?

[gunnyg]

we’re better off w/obama; then no sane man can deny/project the truth away !!!!!

Semper Watching !!!!!!
Dick G
*****

[Colonel_Flagg]

"Most of the time they head to the middle."

I'm trying to think of the last moderate Democrat that ran for President.

2008, 2012 - Baraq. Communist.
2004 - John F'n Kerry. Traitor, socialist.
2000 - Algore. Environmentalist whacko.
1992, 2006 - Bill Xlinton. Wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese Communist Party.
1988 - Mike Dukakis. Inconsequential liberal.
1984 - Walter Mondale. Vice-President to the second-worst President since Reconstruction. Reliable liberal stooge.
1976, 1980 - Jimmy Carter. Anti-Semite, liberal.
1972 - George McGovern. See 1976 without the anti-Semitism.
1968 - Hubert Humphrey. Today, he'd be a Republican.

What was that about going toward the middle again, Chris?

[Responsibility2nd]

I definitely won’t vote for him to be President....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh you’ll vote for him all right. In a choice of Cruz over Hillary - you’ll pick Cruz.

Or you’ll be like a lot of trolls that vote 3rd party or some other silly tactic that essentially hands the election over to the libs.

[Blackirish]

In the last election he predicted George Allen.

[Beagle8U]

“”The hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 and the nomination is going to Rand Paul”

I’ll take ‘Things that don’t go together’ for $500 Alex.

[Buckeye McFrog]

He has strong and growing support from young people. Most of whom I doubt are registered to vote in GOP primaries.

[Beagle8U]

Friends don’t let friends vote for Liberaltarian idiots.

[ilgipper]

I am curious. If Cruz is not natural born, when was he naturalized?

[muir_redwoods]

A vast improvement over 2008 and 2012

[nascarnation]

If it’s Hillary v. NJFatboy in Nov 2016, I’m writing in Putin.....

[SeekAndFind]

Did you miss LBJ?

He was the one who started the GREAT SOCIETY and the WAR ON POVERTY. Legacies that we’re still paying for today.

[Jewbacca]

Fortunately, the settled law (whether you agree with it or not) permits Cruz to be president.

[Carthego delenda est]

“Which would be like the hard-right taking over the Democrat party, same thing, which means no way in hell - which is why we need a new party.”

Without a new party there will be coservative voter division once again regarding the few conservatives candidates, which will play out perfectly for Karl and the GOPe to push Rubio or some other such democrat on us.

[Colonel_Flagg]

I only went back to 1968. I was looking for the last reasonable Democrat.

1964 - LBJ - holy crap. 1960 - John F. Kennedy - today, he'd be a Republican too.

[BarnacleCenturion]

Hundreds of lower courts have decided Obama is a Natural Born Citizen. The SCOTUS validated that by not reviewing it.

What else is there to say?

Obama has a US birth certificate.

Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate.

Other than that, their cases are exactly the same.

[GBA]

NO, I WON'T.

I did that with the ineligible McCain and I won't be making that mistake again. I hate my self for that weakness and for violating my integrity and that of my country. So much for my Pledge of Allegiance all those years.

You don't stand on principles by violating them, fix the Constitution by breaking it or beat the libs by out-liberaling them.

If you want to waste an asset like Speaker Cruz and the many years he could be of service as Senate leader, to instead run him for something he isn't eligible for, and might only be in office for four to eight years, you're far more of a "troll" than I.

You know that the demonrats will challenge someone born in Canada as not being an NBC, since that's not even as close as obama's official story.

And, they'd be right.

[novemberslady]

Chris Matthews is seriously funny.
Not as good as Stephen Colbert, but very good at satire.

Whether it's the thrill up his pant leg for obama, or naming the nominee for the republican presidential candidate, his dry wit never fails to please.

[Old Sarge]

I’d like to join Commander Riker in applauding your most excellent post:

[InterceptPoint]

Fortunately, the settled law (whether you agree with it or not) permits Cruz to be president.

I'm not sure "settled law" is the correct term but I don't disagree with the sentiment. The courts just don't want to mess with this issue. Maybe that makes it "settled".

And I repeat. Cruz would make a fine President. I would vote for him in heartbeat.

[kenavi]

Doesn’t anybody here realize that Rand Paul is sympathetic to some form of amnesty as well?

Crickets?

[GraceG]

“I believe the Republican Party is going to go hard-right in 2016.”

Romney was a Hard Right candidate to the likes of Chrissy “Tingly Legs” Mathews.....

Rand Paul is more of a Libertarian Limited Government type.

[GraceG]