Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government Shutdown Highlights Government Waste
Political Realities ^ | 10/08/13 | LD Jackson

Posted on 10/08/2013 3:42:25 AM PDT by LD Jackson

I have long been a fan of Senator Tom Coburn and his work to showcase the government waste that is so prevalent in Washington, D.C. He isn't necessarily involved in this story, but it goes well with the work he has done. We know the government shutdown consists of non-essential government workers staying home until the Democrats decide to stop their ridiculous mantra of "we will not negotiate" and compromise with the Republicans to pass legislation to fund the federal government. But do you realize how many government workers are staying home? Since the federal government is the nation's largest employer, it is no surprise that the number is quite large. Some 800,000 workers are now sitting at home because of the Democrats refusal to negotiate.

While I do sympathize with their plight, back pay not withstanding, the government shutdown should serve as a mechanism to show us all just how bloated the federal government really is. Entire agencies have been shuttered because their employees are considered to be non-essential. Taken from Fox News, here are a few of the agencies that have exactly zero employees reporting for work as the government shutdown continues into its second week.

Government WasteKnowing how big the federal government is, the 800,000 non-essential workers doesn't surprise me. We have entire government agencies that are useless in the grand scheme of what is supposed to be the federal government of the United States. Why do any of the above mentioned government agencies even exist, if their employees are non-essential? Why do we, the American taxpayer, continue to fund these agencies, when their work has nothing to do with our actual government.

There used to be a lot of talk about running the federal government like a corporation. While I believe that analogy is only partially true, it is something to think about. If the federal government conducted its business like a large corporation, it appears that cutbacks and layoffs would be in order. I believe they call it downsizing and that is exactly what our government needs. We spend a great deal of money on accomplishing nothing and then we all wonder why the government is broke. I would humbly suggest that if Washington had its house in order, biting the bullet and making the hard choice to remove the bloated agencies and their employees from the government payroll, then maybe we wouldn't be in the financial hole we are currently in.

I have no desire to see so many people lose their jobs. I realize it would be a terrible economic blow for them and the nation would suffer pain, as a result. However, if we continue down this path, the cliff to which we are headed is looking steeper every day. We have kicked this can down the same road for decades. Sooner or later, it is going to go off said cliff and when it does, the economic pain is going to be much worse than it would have been, had our government been able to rid itself of the wasteful spending we see highlighted in this government shutdown.

This may not be a popular topic, especially if you happen to be a government worker, but it is something that needs to be considered. Might I suggest they start with the GSA?


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: government; spending

1 posted on 10/08/2013 3:42:26 AM PDT by LD Jackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson
If you want to SEE WASTE, take a look at our SecState in traditonal Bali garb!!!

NOT A PHOTOSHOP


2 posted on 10/08/2013 3:49:25 AM PDT by USS Alaska (If I could...I would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

“Might I suggest they start with the GSA?”

Right - these are the guys who purchase toilet seats for government facilities, at $87.00 @


3 posted on 10/08/2013 3:59:38 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

Isn’t GSA the agency that spent money on partying and bonuses? Another agency to get rid of, Bureau of Land Management.


4 posted on 10/08/2013 4:22:27 AM PDT by gattaca ("Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

“Oh my, I didn’t know it was a tropical theme night! And here I am in my wife’s old housecoat.”


5 posted on 10/08/2013 4:39:21 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

The one that really stands out to me in this list is the Census Bureau. Over 15,000 full-time employees to accomplish a task that only needs to be done once every 10 years! Why can’t we hire temps to perform the actual work of the census every ten years, instead of keeping over 15000 people on a full time payroll for nine years at a time with essentially no real work to do? (Yes, I realize that the Census Bureau gathers data other than the Constitutionally mandated census, but is that really necessary? It’s certainly not Constitutional.)


6 posted on 10/08/2013 6:10:07 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson