I do not have a copy of the lease, as I do not need the federal government lease me a vacation property.
However, the article says the lease agreement states that it must be used as a vacation property, not a primary residence.
What would be wrong with selling off these federal lands?
The article doesn’t actually say that it must be used as a vacation property, not a primary residence.
It says “considered vacation homes; one of the lease requirements to own a plot is people must have an alternative residence.”
It doesn’t say if the Spencer’s have an alternative residence or not.