Skip to comments.Feds Take $37 Billion From Ratepayers But Pass On the Job of Disposing Nuclear Waste
Posted on 10/10/2013 9:20:29 AM PDT by MichCapCon
DTE Energy has joined a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Energy that says the federal agency has collected nearly $37 billion for the disposal of used fuel from nuclear power plants but not disposed of the waste.
The lawsuit asks that the DOE stop collecting money to do a job it has neglected to do. The federal government has been collecting the disposal money since 1982, according to the lawsuit.
It is kind of like paying a mortgage on a house that hasnt been built yet, said Tom Kauffman, spokesman for the Nuclear Energy Institute.
DTE Energy, which operates the Fermi 2 plant near Monroe, joined the lawsuit because Michigan rate payers have paid $567.6 million of the $37 billion, said company spokesman Guy Cerullo.
But consumers are not just paying the Department of Energy for work it isnt doing. The nuclear operating companies have collected $1.3 billion in court by winning more than 70 lawsuits against the federal government for not handling the used nuclear fuel. The nuclear operating companies are using that money to store the used nuclear fuel onsite, Kauffman said.
"You are getting the double whammy," Kauffman said.
The U.S. Department of Energy referred comment to the U.S. Department of Justice, which didn't respond to requests for comment.
Michigan has three operating nuclear power plants.
The fuel rods from those plants that must be stored are 12-feet high. Cerullo said all the used fuel from 25 years of operation at the Fermi Nuclear Plant would fit in a 50-by-50 foot wide, 40-foot deep fuel pool.
Yucca Mountain in Nevada was set up to be the repository of nuclear waste as early as 1987. The Obama Administration stopped that in 2010. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, has fought against storing the waste in the state.
A commission was set up in 2010 and issued a report in 2012 that recommended dealing with the short term and long term solutions of disposing of the nuclear waste but came up with no specific destinations.
Radioactive waste can generally be stored and disposed of safely. The federal government has sponsored films of trains crashing into nuclear waste containers to show how it can be safely transferred.
There is a way to dispose of nuclear “waste”, which in most instances is the quantity of “spent” uranium fuel rods taken from nuclear reactors which have become ineffective in producing the energy needed to generate electrical power.
Thorium-based nuclear reactors, which have been built and tested on an experimental basis, have two definite advantages over uranium-fueled nuclear reactors. One is that by its very nature, thorium-based reactors do not have the “runaway” meltdown potential of uranium-based reactors, as they use molten salt as the heat transfer medium, not some form of either “light” or “heavy” water, which does vast mischief should the coolant circulation system fail in any way.
Another is the availability of fuel - there is considerably more thorium available, and it is less complicated to refine, than uranium.
A further advantage is that the “spent” uranium rods can be “reburned” in the thorium reactor, thus eventually reducing the “waste” aspect of the spent fuel rods.
And why are there not ALL thorium-powered nuclear reactors in use all over the world? Because the “spent” fuel from thorium reactors cannot be further refined into weapons-grade fissile material, as can “spent” uranium fuel rods.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.