Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starship Troopers and the Right to Vote
Making It Up As I Go..... ^ | November 7, 2011 | Dan Thompson

Posted on 10/20/2013 7:55:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: stormer

I like that, because with the current regime they would add in “public employees.” Then we would be in a permanent status as serfs working for the government class.


41 posted on 10/20/2013 9:04:32 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stormer

That’s what the Founders said. Under the Franchise system, a civilian would still have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. No one could deprive of earning a livelihood and holding property; not enslave or draft you. You simply couldn’t vote or hold office without meeting the conditions of the Franchise.


42 posted on 10/20/2013 9:11:35 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

being a slave. servant of the fascist government master is not a “contribution” to anyone but the FGM


43 posted on 10/20/2013 9:14:00 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Presently we have more of a mob voting to steal then citizens voting for proper government. The question is more correctly “How can a nation ensure the people voting for government officials have both adequate knowledge to make informed decisions and the moral underpinning to prevent voting to steal or worse from their fellow citizens?” This question is as old as man. Our founders understood that men themselves are the problem and attempted to protect our future by ultimately adopting the constitution. With its rules and the separation of powers the hope was it would protect us from the corruption of man. Part of this barrier was a restriction on who could vote. With this restriction our nation prospered and the foundation was set for national greatness. So strong was that foundation that it has resisted continued dilution of the voter pool to the point where even the most ignorant of individuals had the franchise and felt it a duty to vote. But the combined efforts of a marxist government and a marxist propaganda press have damaged that foundation and perhaps destroyed it. So, let’s return to the original formula. You have to own property to vote. And let’s add to it. You must also have served at least two years in the armed forces. And you must also pass a citizenship test. And you must not be receiving welfare, social security or any other government transfer payment of any type. Disabled veterans excepted. And you must present identification to vote. And you will be marked indelibly after you vote. I can see long term problems with this but it would go a long way to correcting our present problems.


44 posted on 10/20/2013 9:15:42 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

bump

serve the beast, and get a vote

and if those servants of the beast are the ones who vote we’d be able to control the beast how?


45 posted on 10/20/2013 9:16:01 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

No vote, no taxes then?

I won’t have to pay taxes, that sounds fair


46 posted on 10/20/2013 9:18:19 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

You must be willing to be sodomized by your government masters and you must say you LOVE Big Brother.... then they will let you vote.

Big Fascist Government Brother


47 posted on 10/20/2013 9:19:30 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

People forget that voting in the US was a franchise, not a right.

The Founding Fathers embraced the idea that the voting franchise was extended only to landowners (and male at that). The rationale was that these had the vested interest of the country at heart.

The argument for this limited franchise was a good one, but not the only one. I submit that it was far better than the universal franchise upon majority that we now have.

I also submit that a national service requirement for the voting franchise makes more sense than the current franchise. Whether it’s the best is open to consideration.


48 posted on 10/20/2013 9:38:27 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You should be a holder of real property to vote.


49 posted on 10/20/2013 9:55:49 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

That’ll never happen again unless we divide into two or more sections.


50 posted on 10/20/2013 9:59:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Obama's favorite game is Pin the Fail on the Honkey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Didn’t you pay in to Social Security and Medicare? That’s not true of TANF, SNAP, farm subsidies and the rest, at least not directly.”

I would remind all those here, FICA (social security) goes by the real name of “Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax”

Clearly, even in it’s name is the word “insurance”. It was designed and sold to the citizens an insurance... Why would anyone think one did not have a “right” to collect on your “insurance”?

It’s true that the politicians stole all the money, but that doesn’t mean it’s not owed.


51 posted on 10/20/2013 10:00:13 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: babygene

The same is true of decades of promises of “free healthcare for you and your dependents” which led many a person to do 20 or more years in the service and then was welshed on.


52 posted on 10/20/2013 10:02:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Obama's favorite game is Pin the Fail on the Honkey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
The Founders had it right in the beginning. They despised democracy and formed a republic. Later on, lesser Americans, many of whom were complete idiots, thought, "Hey, if some people being able to vote is good, then more people being able to vote is better, and everybody being able to vote is best!" Then you get Obamaphones.

After the revolution, whoever is left alive needs to start again with only male taxpayers over the age of 25 being able to vote. And requirements for president of the USA should be explicitly stated as male, over 40, born to citizen parents, and raised at least until the age of eighteen on American soil (overseas US territories count).
53 posted on 10/20/2013 10:05:37 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I did my two years’ duty as a Naval Reservist and two tours in Vietnam; one with the Mobile Riverine Force (TF-117) and one with SEAL/UDT boat support (Mobile Support Team, TF-116). I qualify by Bob Heinlein's standard for citizenship and the vote.
54 posted on 10/20/2013 10:07:55 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Years ago, I put in my FR profile a quote from ‘Troopers’ which I still believe makes sense. The 1997 movie was a disservice to Heinlein but I liked it anyhow.

I know that the book has been used for training purposes for military officers and that it addresses issues of esprit de corps and discipline for trainees. It delves into interesting aspects of ‘basic training’ for military recruits and it really ought to be read widely.

I think that the notion of earning certain aspects of citizenship such as holding office and voting makes a degree of sense. What we have currently is a system that is virtually guaranteed to result in destruction of the Republic as we are clearly witnessing.

55 posted on 10/20/2013 10:20:24 PM PDT by Radix ("..Democrats are holding a meeting today to decide whether to overturn the results of the election.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The same is true of decades of promises of “free healthcare for you and your dependents” which led many a person to do 20 or more years in the service and then was welshed on.

Very true...

I can’t say though that I was lured by healthcare. The idea of retiring at 40 almost got me though... But I made the right decision I think. I got out after my hitch and went to work for HP for the next 35 years. I can’t complain.


56 posted on 10/20/2013 10:39:03 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

For the first two, no, because you paid into them. It’s not your fault the government blew your account balance on the political equivalent of hookers and blow.

Farm subsidies, no.

That was pretty simple...


57 posted on 10/20/2013 10:44:11 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

In the state of our current system, it’s about a 50-50 split these days among eligible voters over who pays Federal Income taxes and who doesn’t. I’m thinking representation without taxation ain’t such a hot deal, either.

Don’t worry, we’ll never have to live under a Franchise. The net-receivers won’t allow it.


58 posted on 10/20/2013 11:37:36 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DirtyPigpen
I think you need to have skin in the game.

Absolutely. If it were limited to native and naturalized citizens who were net tax payers, I'd be happy with that. That's about the best we can possibly hope for these days. The founders were more restrictive.

59 posted on 10/20/2013 11:42:21 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
I’d say, right off the top, they were about at least 50% more restrictive...

Free, white, male, 21, and a property owner, iirc.

There may have been others who had skin in the game, but in colonial times, that pulled in most.

60 posted on 10/20/2013 11:50:34 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson