Skip to comments.Pentagon, Under The Betrayer-in-Chief, Imprisons/Betrays Soldiers/Vets & Rewards Terrorists
Posted on 12/11/2013 5:19:44 AM PST by AdinaF
Cards on the table: Obama Inc. is not only a criminal enterprise, but a regime gone completely wild. No amount of lipstick on a pig will change said ugly truths.
Therefore, when enemies supplant friends and patriots become foes, the first targets of anti-American leadership are its front line defense its armed forces! Why? Because without their forward arm there is no defense of the homeland. As such, doesnt it make sense that anti-American leadership would target them first, in effect, making sure that demoralizing the troops is a priority?
In tandem, U.S. military downsizing tops their list of go to projects. But never mind the truth, for while budget constraints are cited as the cause for downsizing, the fact of the matter is that billions are found when progressive political goals are in play. Think: Obamacare and its massive, wasteful expenditures, plus countless other green schemes.
As to Obama Inc.s forward arm betrayals, look no further than here and there:
Now, who recalls the Pentagons broadsides against a dedicated officer, for daring to question the more than illegitimate bonafides of the Commander-in-Chief, instead, treating him like an enemy and worse? Yes, Lt Col Lakin is a hero & a role model for protecting freedom and honor, unwilling to sacrifice core patriotic values.
Yet, how can it be that heroes are targeted with impunity and a vast majority of citizens sit still in the face of said dishonor? U.S. Heroes Are Targeted Under The Thuggish Reign Of Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
NOT content with bleeding the taxpayers dry, Obama Inc. has turned the IRS into its personal bludgeon against conservative entities, mainly chasing after vets and Tea Party patriots: Obamas IRS: the ILLEGAL targeting of Vets and patriots alike. Whats their end point?
(Excerpt) Read more at wp.me ...
Terry Lakin is an idiot and a jerk. If he had a problem with Obama as commander-in-chief, he should have resigned rather than commit an act of insubordination. In doing so, he threw away a brilliant career and brought opprobrium to himself and financial hardship to his loved ones.
The Tyrant is only destroying Americans whom
Issa, his treasonous Committee, and the docile Congress
I thought the guidelines include that a lengthy article needs to be excerpted....
His first stop is America, with an eye towards the west in toto. All the evidence is overwhelming in scope. IF this landed in a criminal court, even a mediocre prosecutor could sleepwalk through the indictment, the proofs are so clear.
Well, if one looks at it through the lens of personal ambition, then surely he could have taken another less difficult tack. As to resigning, that was not an option. He was told to ship off, or face the consequences.
In any case, a man who is so talented would hardly find himself adrift financially, when all is said and done.
I disagree with you, but we are free to disagree.
From my post:
“Post your articles as fully as you can, and if they are extra long, just say so. People will understand.”
I will stick my neck out here and say this might have been a miscue on my part. Maybe I should have given an example.
When I said, “Just say so,” as you browse FR, you will often see in parenthesis at the end of the headline, “Long Read” or just “Long.”
OR say so in the first sentence that the following article is lengthy.
That lets everyone know that it is a lengthy article and if they are interested, they will read it if it is well written and informative.
Actually, people can see that it’s long when they go to it and so you don’t necessarily have to say anything, but there are many articles, like Greenfield’s for instance, that are USUALLY long, but are so good there is a ping list for them.
Do what you do do well and your rewards will follow.
If you were misled by what I said, I apologize, but seriously, you need to get to know this site and read the guidelines so you know what you can and can’t post, like the copyright guidelines and what articles from where must be excerpted or are outright prohibited.
When in doubt and you can’t find the answer, ask the Admin Moderator for guidance if you are really stymied.
I don’t know that there is much else I can say or do.
I give you the benefit of the doubt here, for what it’s worth.
Well, Lakin has his little cheering section that follows him around, so I guess he's happy.
He received bad legal advice from someone he trusted, but at least he tried. What have you done? Have you sacrificed anything to fight the tyranny we face?
I've never committed insubordination or broken the law. And I am not looking for 15 minutes of fame.
I have, it was awesome.
It wasn't for some Alex Jones Crazy-Cause though.