Posted on 12/26/2013 10:12:33 AM PST by Fawn
Total hogwash.
Michelle is the Romulan, Barry is the Cling-On...
Or maybe he is a borg...
My question wasn’t whether laser printers were available, but rather whether the HDOH was using them (in combination with the fonts and resolution, etc) for printing of short-form Certification of Live Birth computer abstracts at the time such that the closely resembled the short forms that were being printed in 2007. I’m thinking not. So, if the presumed self-incriminating whistle blower in the video is claiming that the short-form was even partially a graphical copy of a paper form she created in 1985, I’m doubting her account.
Probably just a “false flag” type setup where this crazy comes out and says she forged it and then is easily dismissed... So then all subsequent claims of a forged certificate are easily written off or ignored because the last claim was a false one...
She sounds credible.
She’s a little scattered on her presentation but she has information that can’t be easily used in a weave of lies.
She was working for organized crime, Medellin Cartel, in the cocaine trade.
We know Clinton was next deep in funds transfer from cocaine trade back in the 1980s.
This could very well be getting at an accurate source.
If all she says is accurate, I wonder why she is coming out now. Could be she is terminally ill or something and she wants to leave everything to a website.
All this is speculation but one thing is clear. If she disappears soon, we will have another conspiracy story to bandy about. But not all conspiracy stories are false!
Someone should download her video.
Ping
wow! the resemblances are striking!
“Now a whistle blower comes forward and claims she forged Obamas birth certificate in 1985.”
The COLB was obviously forged in photoshop, or a similar digital editing program, which did not exist in 1985. So I think we can safely dismiss this claim on its face.
This is just a bunch of complete BS. As soon as I heard the whole assassination bit, JFK Jr., Reagan, Hinckley, etc. This reeks of disinformation and silliness. Nothing but a clumsy attempt to delegitimize the efforts of those actually trying to get to the truth.
If you are interested in learning more about Nancy Owens, this self-confessed forger, check out https://www.facebook.com/molly.n.owens/posts/456669547754174.
My opinion is that she is certifiably insane, and I am not using hyperbole.
We had an apple laser printer and 6 macs in June 1986. I think adobe did the print types. We had Adobe PageMaker and I think this was before Adobe Illustrator.
How is Nancy Owens related to obama?
there was no PHOTOSHOP back in 1985
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Photoshop_version_history
the woman did not use what was not available to do ANYTHING!
she may have had access to a App called Quantel Paintbox but most people had no idea such a system Including QuanteL Hardware..a necessary part of the wuantel system even eXisted...in 1985,
How is that possible?
Maybe it has to do with some statute of limitations that she know about ... :-) ...
THEN AGAIN ... it could be the prelude to a book deal.
she says she has nothing to do with the PDF in the interview.
Bookmark for later...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.