Skip to comments.Helping the Little Guy: Relieve Occupational Licensing Requirements and Fees
Posted on 12/27/2013 8:27:38 AM PST by MichCapCon
When it comes to financial burdens, both Republicans and Democrats often claim to "fight for the little guy."
The former may campaign against tax hikes while the latter may vote for "progressive" taxes on top earners, but don't be fooled: when it comes to occupational licensing, both sides consistently vote to burden people with often unnecessary fees and requirements.
State and local governmental units also want people to pay a fee in order to clean carpets, run card games and raffles, operate vending machines or compete as a horse jockey. Licensing is a process by which the state makes it illegal to do a certain job unless one completes a series of mandatory classes, training or exams (or all three), and pays an assortment of fees. The rules disproportionally affect low- and middle-income workers who may not have the knowledge or expertise to navigate through this complicated system of rules and regulations. Licensure is often applied to jobs that typically do not require a college degree.
The state of Michigan requires licensing for hundreds of occupations, from A (auctioneer) to W (Wrecker service). Once local licensing is taken into account, the state increases the cost of earning a living for more than 1,000 different occupations.
These government rules are growing more prevalent. The national percent of occupations now requiring a license has increased from approximately 5 percent in 1950 to about 30 percent today, according to Morris Kleiner of the University of Minnesota.
In Michigan, the state mandates 60 hours of classes and training and several hundred dollars in fees to legally work as a painter or landscape architect and to do other construction work, such as installing a storm window, putting up rain gutters and laying down tile.
State barbers have among the heaviest licensing requirements in the nation. They must endure 2,000 hours of training at one of the seven private barber colleges in the state. Lawyers only need 1,200. Few other states have mandates that weighty. The state of Alabama had no licensing at all until this year, and there is no evidence that getting a haircut in the Heart of Dixie is any less safe than getting one in the Great Lake State. Unsurprisingly, the colleges training Michigan barbers fight tirelessly to keep the regulations in place because it amounts to a guaranteed revenue stream for them.
State and local governmental units also want people to pay a fee to clean carpets, run card games and raffles, operate vending machines or compete as a horse jockey.
The state and local licensing groups often maintain that these requirements are for safety, but almost all of the areas for which the state requires licenses are not what most people would reasonably consider dangerous.
The Michigan House is considering dozens of bills that would repeal certain requirements, but the fight will be difficult. Licensing is a textbook example of the phenomenon economists call "concentrated benefits and diffused costs." Those with the most to gain (like the private barber colleges) devote more resources to lobby to preserve their advantage than those who are damaged (the service providers and consumers who are both forced to pay more to trade in the marketplace) devote to eliminating the regulations.
An option for the Legislature that would put Michigan licensing standards on the correct path is House Bill 4641, introduced by Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills. The bill prohibits government units from imposing occupational licensure without proof of valid public health and safety concerns, and when licensing is beneficial, requires the least restrictive method of obtaining it. It also allows workers to sue the state if a regulation excessively burdens their right to earn a living; if a court agreed, the mandate would be thrown out.
With that in mind, many of Michigan's licensing laws should be thrown out, which would allow more residents to become gainfully employed and consumers to benefit from the lower prices brought by competition.
It all depends.
Licensing of beauticians or house painters is pure unadulterated idiocy. Licensing of Abortion clinics made sense.
I went to engineering school and needed 200 quarter-hours of classes for my bachelor's degree. Since a quarter lasted ten weeks, each quarter-hour would be equal to ten hours in class. So to become an engineer I needed the same amount of class and lab time as I would to become a barber??? And considering how many general electives outside of math, science or engineering I had to take, the Michigan barber probably has more time on topic than I did. Well, unless the barber also takes psychology or music theory classes to pad his schedule.
We have saved thousands of dollars over the last 33 years doing home hair cuts.
Every gov’t office is going to set up fees to be paid to augment their revenue scheme.
I’m the treasurer for our local Republican Women’s group. When I took over, the bank where we have our account told us we needed a new EIN as the one we’d used for the past ten years was no longer valid for some reason & the bank couldn’t let us have an account without the number. Of course there was a fee to get it. And I just got a bill for $50 for the next two years. Absolutely ridiculous...
Licensing for most occupations decreases competition, preventing some people from opening a business or getting a job. It is also a windfall for community colleges.
Now, this is supposed to make me better at my job. The problem is...all that is taught is what we learned BEFORE we got our license.
A few folks are getting rich.
Hear Hear...Brother runs a small home repair business in a four county area containing about 34 small cities. Each city demands a business license ranging from $100 to $150 each and people complain that he charges too much.
I met an underground restaurant owner in Detroit. He used to run a legitimate restaurant but says the taxation, regulation, and corrupt army of inspectors drove him underground. The health and safety of his legal restaurant was suffering as a result of his attempts to remain compliant.
He told me about an inspector who came in to his legal restaurant and said he found a problem but could overlook it for an extra $100. He told the inspector that he would just spend $50 to fix the problem so the inspector turned around and wrote him up for $2000 worth of imaginary violations.
Here in NY, we call them folks...The Mafia.
Yeah but even the Mafia won’t shut down a business if they can avoid it.
For every additional tax or tax increase there ought to be a reciprocal reduction in regulation(s). For every piece of legislation enacted there ought to be 10 pieces of legislation repealed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.