Time to make another deposit?
Posted on 01/08/2014 9:18:47 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one), Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare. The groups had made their application last Friday arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote, and it had originated in the Senate where the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate, the law was therefore unconstitutional and implementation of Obamacare should at least be stayed pending further examination.
While there are other minor issues attached to the application that were also not addressed the truth of the matter is clear: John Roberts will never do...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Constitution?
We doan need no steenking Constitution!
A lawless Chief Justice to go with our lawless Chief Executive....we are so screwed. Both should be impeached for not upholding the Constitution as they took an oath to do.
He is either blackmailed to the hilt, payed off royaly, or both.
Geez, we have a person sitting at the top of the Supreme Court who is breaking the law.
And that word DOES mean what we think it means.
I agree on all scores of your post and sadly just like Obama clearly lacks eligibility to be POTUS Its a done deal
The white house must have something big on him.
he did the right thing....this was posted on fr yesterday
Chief inJustice John Robs US. BTW—how did this knucklehead leapfrog over Scalia to be chosen as Chief Justice? Another Booooosh blunder...
Justice Roberts adopted 2 Irish kids AFTER they’d been “moved” to S. America.
This little detour is a dodge of Irish Adoption law.
He’d rather not have these little details come to light.
The most common theory is that the adoption of his kids may have been illegal.
Time to make another deposit?
If he is being blackmailed, and the reason is the details of the adoptions, then the thing to do is to get it out in the open. If the New York Times was going to do this, but pulled back to provide the Democrats with a blackmail opportunity, then some conservative group or organization needs to take up the mantle. Let’s get it all out in front of the public, that’s the only way to derail a blackmail operation.
Standing by.
LOL, you slipped under their radar screen with that one.
Roberts effectively pissed all over the Constitution, and even his own previous ruling with his denying a stay in this case. He himself ruled it was a tax, and the Constitution is clear that all tax bills are to originate in the House of Representatives. I wouldn’t expect such judicial foolishness, even by the most liberal of justices. Too bad he can’t be demoted to the 9th Circus, because that’s where he belongs.
Hmmm Has that ever been done? Can it be done? What would happen if there was a vacancy on a lower court, and the president nominate a SCOTUS judge to fill the vacancy? It would surely be a HUGE public insult to any SCOTUS judge involved, and that’s what Roberts deserves.
Money means nothing to a man like Roberts. He’s already got Power. Money is only useful if it can buy more Power.
bfl
The adoption issue is not very persuasive. He did the right thing adopting, his motives were good. So what, he bent the rules? It has to be something much bigger
I can see Mark Levin in another really bad mood tonight.
Did anyone here ever buy that book about his dog Scupp that he kept on talking about a few years back?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.