Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT THOSE PESKY “NO-GUNS” SIGNS
Illinois State Rifle Association ^ | Jan 16, 2014

Posted on 01/16/2014 8:03:31 AM PST by KeyLargo

ILLINOIS STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION

INFORMATIONAL ALERT

WHAT TO DO ABOUT THOSE PESKY “NO-GUNS” SIGNS

As you may know, the concealed carry law enacted last year ironically includes provisions that will greatly impede your ability to defend yourself against violent criminals. Among these impediments to self defense is a provision allowing private property owners to prohibit concealed firearms on their property. The law requires such property owners to post government-approved “no guns allowed” signs on property entrances.

As implementation of concealed carry goes forward, more and more of these “no guns allowed” signs will be springing up in businesses across Illinois. Although law-abiding firearm owners are offended by such signs, most of us accept that private property owners are free to limit access to their property as they see fit. Nonetheless, the placement of such signs poses some serious public policy implications to those who honor free exercise of basic human rights.

In practical terms, the official “no guns allowed” sign actually declares, “No Self Defense Permitted Beyond this Point.” Thus, a property owner who posts a “no guns allowed” sign is telling you point blank, “I don’t care if you and your family are in danger, I will not allow you to defend yourself.” The net effect of the property-owner’s self-righteous indignation is that anyone who enters the posted property unarmed is being set up for violent attack.

The beauty of concealed carry is that only handful of citizens need to be armed in order to protect the greater part of society from harm. This benefit arises out of the fact that would-be criminals are never really sure which citizens around them may be armed. As a result, their criminal urges may be stifled in the interest of not getting shot.

Given the deterrent value of concealed carry, the posting of “no guns allowed” signs openly invites criminals to enter a business to commit mayhem without the fear of facing an armed citizen. Under the concealed carry statute, persons licensed to carry must obey these signs. By their very nature, criminals will not be deterred by a plastic pictogram stuck to a window. Consequently, armed criminals will be absolutely assured that nobody in the establishment is capable of warding off their violent behavior. “No guns allowed” signs give a distinct advantage to those who seek to harm others.

For thugs who may be too shy to perform for an audience, the parking lots of “no guns allowed” establishments would be little more to their liking. It would be a given that anyone leaving such a business would be unarmed and, thus, easy pickings for robbers or rapists. Likewise, these criminals would be free to burglarize cars in the parking lot to harvest guns dutifully left behind by permit holders who enter the antigun business.

All in all, it’s distinctly possible that posting a “no guns allowed” sign makes patronizing a business more dangerous now that concealed carry has been passed than it had been to patronize the same store before the passage of concealed carry.

Quite a few people have contacted ISRA headquarters to report businesses that have posted “no guns allowed” signs. Many of the people ask how they should respond to the posting of such signs. Below are our recommendations.

1. Carrying a concealed firearm in to an establishment bearing an official “no guns allowed” sign is not lawful and should not be attempted.

2. Business owners who post “no guns allowed” signs consider lawful firearm owners to be social outcasts. Therefore, those businesses should be avoided, but not without first hearing how displeased you are with their decision. We recommend that you ask to see the manager and then politely tell him or her that you are a lawful firearm owner and that you disagree with their position on concealed carry. Advise the manager further that, as long as the offensive sign is posted, you will not spend money at their establishment and that you will tell all your friends to avoid doing business with them as well.

3. Reward businesses who allow concealed carry by spending money in their establishments.

4. Remain active in the gun rights movement at a local level.

5. Join the ISRA.

6. Donate to the ISRA so that we may carry on the fight to preserve, protect, and enhance gun rights in the state.

Follow the ISRA on Twitter and Facebook.

Give the gift of an ISRA membership. Not an ISRA Member? Join Today!

http://isra.org/


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; illinois; isra; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2014 8:03:31 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Cook County leading concealed carry applications

31 minutes ago • Associated Press

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. | Illinois State Police say almost one in four of the roughly 23,000 people who’ve applied for concealed carry permits live in Cook County.

Figures released this week show the highly populated county leading the rankings with more than 5,300 applications that have been filed since Jan. 5.

Will and DuPage counties followed in second and third with almost 1,800 and 1,600 applications respectively.

But on a per capita basis, rural counties have the highest proportion of applicants.

Read at:

http://www.nwitimes.com/news/state-and-regional/illinois/cook-county-leading-concealed-carry-applications/article_6f107bd0-375d-561e-9525-618882b2299e.html


2 posted on 01/16/2014 8:10:33 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

“WHAT TO DO ABOUT THOSE PESKY “NO-GUNS” SIGNS?”

Target practice


3 posted on 01/16/2014 8:11:00 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Those businesses should be avoided!


4 posted on 01/16/2014 8:11:31 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

A little “guerilla stickering” might be called for.

On the window under/over the no guns sign,
post a sticker that says “Notice to Criminals - Unarmed Victim Zone”.


5 posted on 01/16/2014 8:12:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I am not familiar with the latest Illinois mess of laws to skirt the SCOTUS rulings. It sounds like recent state law has bestowed legal ramifications beyond trespassing upon persons otherwise legal at the whim of private business owners.

For those that do not know, in most states (that I am aware of), there is no legal authority or action beyond trespassing that can be taken against a legal citizen who does not recognize or conform to a posted “no guns” sign on an establishment that has not been designated specifically by law (ie. schools, government buildings, etc.).

In other words, a business can ask you to leave the premises if you are carrying (concealed or otherwise). If you refuse, they can call the police on you for trespassing. It seems Illinois is now radically different.


6 posted on 01/16/2014 8:13:24 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals can afford for things to go well, to work, for folks to be happy. They'd be out of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

IL law patterns KS law on a state-specified sign being a legal notice that can result in charges beyond simple trespass. So IL is not the only place. My home state of OK follows your description on simple trespass for failing to leave when told.

As to the overall ISRA material, my problem remains with the treatment of firearms as an onerous civil right that can be restricted at a whim. Years ago, many restaurants posted signage about “reserving the right to refuse service to anyone” and that’s been trumped by the various civil rights acts since 1965.


7 posted on 01/16/2014 8:20:10 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
In Ohio Buckeye Firearms (dot org) offers handy little cards to give to businesses that post "No Firearms Allowed" signs which read in part:

Your “no gun” sign prevents me from patronizing your business. So I, my family, and other gun owners will spend our money with your competitors. Look on the back to see why you should remove your sign.

Your “no gun” sign is bad for business. It does nothing to make you safer. It simply tells criminals you’re an easy target and drives away good customers with a concealed carry license.

Unlike most people, license holders have passed a criminal background check. Statistics show we are far more law-abiding than the general public. Our numbers are growing every day. We are ideal customers and will patronize your business if you let us. Remove your sign and I, my family, and many other gun owners will gladly return.

Buckeye Buckeye Firearms
Firearms Foundation
www.BuckeyeFirearms.org

Funny thing, but the number of businesses which have those signs up now is a fraction of the number back when the Concealed Carry law was originally passed.

8 posted on 01/16/2014 8:20:21 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Vandalism won’t help the cause.


9 posted on 01/16/2014 8:20:32 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Support Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Just take your business elsewhere.

Consider a form letter to the manager of such places telling the manager that you have been a customer for a long time, but cannot, in good faith, do business with anyone who would put politics and political correctness over the safety of its customers by not allowing them to defend themselves.


10 posted on 01/16/2014 8:22:10 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

If you have one of those signs on your house, are the cops allowed to bring their guns in??


11 posted on 01/16/2014 8:25:16 AM PST by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

There was an argument before me between the manager and a customer at my local credit union in Florida. The customer was complaining about a “no firearms on premises” sign. The manager, a known lefty, pointed out she did not want firearms present because someone may misstake them for a robber (it is concealed, not open carry btw) and she pays to have an armed police officer present to protect persons on the property. The guy said so what about the parking lot and what about those places I go to before I come here or where I intend to go when I leave? She looked like deer in the headlights at that one and simply continued that was their policy. I just said nothing and went about my business, armed. I abide by the premise better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6.


12 posted on 01/16/2014 8:26:46 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Here in Texas, a business establishment has to place a State Approved sign (30.06) on their point of entry for it to be valid. Check your State Law to verify the validity of the signage before you enter.

Besides, if you are truly carrying concealed, how would they know if you are armed or not? :-)


13 posted on 01/16/2014 8:27:28 AM PST by Howie66 (Molon Labe, Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
You can carry cards like this to hand to the business owners.


14 posted on 01/16/2014 8:28:05 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

If caught, though, you lose your CCHL forever...


15 posted on 01/16/2014 8:29:03 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Cards are good, but a letter is better. No one gets mail nowadays.

It would also seem to me to be opening up the store to liability if there is a shooting and someone who had the legal ability to defend themselves was denied that ability by the store. Negligent security.


16 posted on 01/16/2014 8:30:13 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Yes, that is another angle...

by posting that sign, Mr. Store Owner, you are assuming full liability for the security of the patrons of your store.


17 posted on 01/16/2014 8:31:57 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

On occasion I have gone through the effort of asking a manager about signs when I have seen them. At two places (Gander Mountain and a Wireless service and device store) I was told that those signs don’t pertain to law abiding customers who have concealed carry licenses. When I asked who the signs are for then, it seemed to occur to them, quite spontaneously, how ridiculous the signs were.

“So you have those signs up to deter criminals from bringing guns into your store? Is that the purpose? Isn’t that like posting “no swimming” signs at pools to deter fish from swimming in them?” -— I actually used that line and will continue to do so. I’m so clever. :o)


18 posted on 01/16/2014 8:33:03 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals can afford for things to go well, to work, for folks to be happy. They'd be out of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

19 posted on 01/16/2014 8:36:09 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

20 posted on 01/16/2014 8:38:35 AM PST by TheDon (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

And in other news.

French Consul Accused of Racism For Advising Citizens To Avoid Walking In Boston’s High Crime Areas After Dark…

Students called the Foreign Ministry’s travel warnings racist, noting they advised French nationals to avoid areas mainly where members of minority groups live.

http://weaselzippers.us/french-consul-accused-of-racism-for-advising-citizens-to-avoid-walking-in-bostons-high-crime-areas-after-dark/


21 posted on 01/16/2014 8:42:21 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Advise the business owner that if their patrons are prohibited the means to defend themselves and if the business owners don’t take positive steps to prevent criminals from illegally harming their patrons, then the business owners will be liable if their patrons suffer harm from any criminal acts for which their legal customers are prohibited from defending themselves against.


22 posted on 01/16/2014 8:45:30 AM PST by Real Cynic No More (Border Fence Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

WIN! Signs coming down at Wal-Mart… UPDATED
January 15, 2014

We’ve seen reports that Wal-Mart is taking down the “No Guns” signage, thanks to gun owners politely contacting them and explaining the confusion the signs were causing. GSL joined with other gun rights groups in encouraging gun owners to make their voices heard and with a little tact and finesse, it seems the signs are coming down as we wanted.

Nice job, everyone!

We will update this as we have a chance to run it down.

UPDATE:

Just got off the phone with Beverly, the district manager Kevin Haney’s assistant.

She confirmed reports we’ve read and heard that Wal-Mart has reversed itself and will be removing the “No Guns” (for on-duty staff and vendors) signage from all of the Illinois stores in the coming days.

Kevin got the initial email from corporate on their decision on this earlier today, because his eight stores in central Illinois generated the most comments and concerns to corporate of any district in Illinois.

Kudos to all of you, right in the heart of Guns Save Life territory, for getting involved to get Wal-Mart to make the right decision to pull the signs.

Beverly did say that corporate legal people were working on the language of the final order to remove the signs but that should be a done deal by the end of the week at the latest and signs should start coming down very shortly after that.

Again, fabulous work, folks!

This entry was posted on January 15, 2014 at 1:44 pm and is filed under Blog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
2 comments on “WIN! Signs coming down at Wal-Mart… UPDATED”

http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=10506


23 posted on 01/16/2014 8:46:15 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Armed citizen truncates crazed man’s mass attack

January 15, 2014

Once again, we see that the only thing that stops a bad person with evil in their heart is a good guy with a gun.

In Portland, a disgruntled man with no shortage of previous arrests thought he was going to “show them” after getting turned away from admission for being an obnoxious jerk. He returned wearing a Halloween mask and carrying a gun and opened fire.

http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=10503


24 posted on 01/16/2014 8:49:55 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Thank you for the good new KeyLargo, Guns up!


25 posted on 01/16/2014 8:54:03 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

And in other news:

‘In America, How Does Such a Thing Happen?’
Jan. 15, 2014 4:49pm Jason Howerton

Related:
#2A

On the surface, John Filippidis seems to be just the kind of responsible gun owner who should carry a concealed firearm. He’s a family man, small business owner and taxpayer who takes the responsibility of gun ownership seriously.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/01/15/gun-owners-encounter-with-police-disturbed-him-so-much-that-hes-thinking-about-canceling-his-ccw-permit/


26 posted on 01/16/2014 8:55:09 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
And, most CHL people are just like that. Family men/women, small business owner/private contractors and taxpayer (yes, people who are pulling the wagon) who takes the responsibility of gun ownership seriously.
27 posted on 01/16/2014 8:59:27 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Those Politically Correct Solutions can kill you.

January 16, 2014 Miguel G

A so-called panic button, which is designed to alert a school’s main office to a classroom emergency, reportedly didn’t work after a Key Largo School teacher pushed his repeatedly while a third-grader threatened to shoot and stab his classmates last week.

The threat was apparently just that, and the boy did not have a weapon. But the school’s reaction to the situation sparked outrage among concerned parents who say they were never informed about the incident until after a child told his parents and that couple posted it on Facebook several days later.

via Classroom panic button didn’t work during threat at Key Largo School – Florida Keys – MiamiHerald.com.

One more time: In case of death or grave bodily harm, it is PULL THE TRIGGER, not PUSH THE ALARM BUTTON.

As the Opposition loves to say: “How many more children’s bodies have to fall for the common sense to be exercised?”

http://gunfreezone.net/wordpress/


28 posted on 01/16/2014 8:59:38 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

And in other news:

Jan 16, 2014

Harvey Weinstein Wants to Destroy the NRA and Leave Us Unprotected

Posted 4 hours ago by Gary DeMar Filed under 2nd Amendment, Constitution, Crime, Entertainment, Gun Control, History, Liberalism, Low Information Voters, Police Brutality, Politics

Movie producer Harvey Weinstein announced on Howard Stern’s radio show that he wants to destroy the National Rifle Association.

Weinstein told Stern, “I shouldn’t say this, but I’ll tell it to you, Howard, I’m going to make a movie with Meryl Streep, and we’re going to take this head-on. And they’re going to wish they weren’t alive after I’m done with them.”

http://godfatherpolitics.com/14023/harvey-weinstein-wants-destroy-nra-leave-us-unprotected/


29 posted on 01/16/2014 9:04:40 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett

And in other news:

NY Gun Control Groups, Pols Double Down on SAFE Act
By Robert Farago on January 16, 2014

Or not (courtesy wivb.com)

How’s that “compromise” thing working out for New York gun owners? A press release (after the jump) from a fanatic of civilian disarmament advocates celebrating the first anniversary reveals that Empire State anti-gunners are looking to “build” on the “historic” NY Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act’s (NY SAFE Act) “widely popular provisions.” Specifically, they want to enact MA-style Child Access Prevention (stored guns must be rendered inoperative), Unicorn-based cartridge ID creation (i.e. microstamping), One Gun A Month purchase limits, ten-day waiting period for firearms purchases, immediate firearms confiscation during domestic abuse calls (without due process), a ban on 50-Caliber “Military-Style Sniper Rifles,” requiring gun dealers to call the cops for failed NICS background checks, and background checks for gun dealer employees. Strangely, outright confiscation was not mentioned . . .

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/01/robert-farago/ny-gun-control-groups-pols-double-safe-act/


30 posted on 01/16/2014 9:08:10 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Walmart continues to exemplify the behavior of successful “big business”. While many excoriate their aggressive business to business practices as heavy handed and unfair, their business model, mission of keeping prices low for customers and bending to the demands of their customers per location is the reason for their continued and unprecedented global success.

They will not be bullied by anyone except customers. They will force all levels of executives to behave and spend in accordance with their mission and have laser like focus on the goals. At the same time, despite what liberals and media would have you believe, they pay comparably fair wages and do take care of their workforce.

Love them or hate them, you have to admire their success and the reasons for it.


31 posted on 01/16/2014 9:09:57 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals can afford for things to go well, to work, for folks to be happy. They'd be out of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Good, let him sink his total wealth into the project, he will lose his shirt! Real American will see right thought the propaganda and completely ignore his money pit. Now if only we could press for open carry, I have my eye on a nice M1873 Colt peacekeeper!
32 posted on 01/16/2014 9:11:01 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Items 5 and 6 were certainly predictable.


33 posted on 01/16/2014 9:12:31 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Depends on state law - if it’s simple trespass, that’s usually a misdemeanor. Above that, there may be an impact on his license but it’s still dependent on state law.


34 posted on 01/16/2014 9:13:37 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

They started popping up around here when Mississippi affirmed open carry... complaining to the businesses and avoiding them while the signs are displayed have caused some of them to disappear.


35 posted on 01/16/2014 9:16:41 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Libtards and their “ideas” are hazardous to Children and all other living things.


36 posted on 01/16/2014 9:17:16 AM PST by Howie66 (Molon Labe, Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

I’m hoping he has a Matt Damon-like experience from his foray into being anti-fracking with his recent agit-prop film “Promised Land.”


37 posted on 01/16/2014 9:18:40 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Free as a bird, guilty as sin!! I think I heard that somewhere before, hum, who was that? Oh I know, the commie terrorist who wrote O turd’s books for him.


38 posted on 01/16/2014 9:20:51 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
I feel confident he will lose his shirt. But he is so wealthy he lives in la-la land and will never realize the error of his was until he is standing at the pearly gates asking to be let in.
39 posted on 01/16/2014 9:24:26 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

I am glad to hear the Mississippi has open carry! I hope the Louisiana and Texas get it too. And yes, all responsible gun owners should do most of the shopping at gun friendly businesses.


40 posted on 01/16/2014 9:28:26 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
 photo mdakillzonecopy_zpsfa50e16a.jpg
41 posted on 01/16/2014 9:31:56 AM PST by bravo whiskey (We should not fear our government. Our government should fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

What about walking in and asking if you can check your firearm at the front desk while you patronize the business? (You don’t actually have to packing, but could do this just to see the reaction.)


42 posted on 01/16/2014 9:33:06 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

no-gun zone means civil liability.

have the lawyers lined up and ready to go.


43 posted on 01/16/2014 9:33:18 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey

Good one!!


44 posted on 01/16/2014 9:52:12 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I would have asked how she could in good conscience ask a law enforcement officer to disobey the law by bringing a gun into a building with a posted "No Guns Allowed" sign. After all, the law should apply to all people equally, rater than being applied differently to different groups of people. That's discrimination!
45 posted on 01/16/2014 9:54:11 AM PST by lcms rev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

In 6 months, I have only seen one open carry person. Most everyone carries concealed... but the right is there and affirmed!


46 posted on 01/16/2014 9:59:22 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

“Here in Texas, a business establishment has to place a State Approved sign (30.06) on their point of entry for it to be valid.”

More to the point, only bars and restauraunts that bust the 51% booze revenue law can legally put those up -— and churches I think.


47 posted on 01/16/2014 10:13:27 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

“I am glad to hear the Mississippi has open carry! I hope the Louisiana and Texas get it too. And yes, all responsible gun owners should do most of the shopping at gun friendly businesses.”

I have a CHL in New Mexico (and routintely carry in Texas).

NM is open carry, so I never worry about accidently showing my gun (e.g., coat lifts up and people see).

TX they’ve got stories about people getting arrested for “imprinting” -— a concealed gun that is visible as a buldge and such.


48 posted on 01/16/2014 10:15:25 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Just seeing that signage is enough to make me do an abrupt about-face and leave.

In Texas there are two different signs that restrict a concealed handgun license holder from carrying into a place of business. They are a 30.06 sign, and a 51% sign.

A 30.06 sign is a sign that a business owner can post to restrict a CHL holder from entering the business with a concealed handgun. The sign must contain the exact words required by Section 30.06 in both English and Spanish, be placed in an area visible to the public, and have 1” lettering or it will not be considered a legally-binding 30.06 sign. “Gunbuster” signs, or signs with a red slash through a gun, are not considered valid 30.06 postings.

A 51% sign is a sign that a business is required by law to post if 51% of their revenue is obtained through on-premises drinking, such as at a bar. Unfortunately this also has the consequence of not allowing CHL holders to enter the premises where the drinking is taking place while carrying their handgun.

Additional places are not required to post a sign to forbid CHL holders from entering the premises with their handgun as Texas law already forbids it, such as court houses and educational institutions.

In essence, one must exercise COMMON SENSE as well as being up to speed on the Law. Then again, part of the requirement in obtaining a CHL IS being familiar with the Law.


49 posted on 01/16/2014 10:28:28 AM PST by Howie66 (Molon Labe, Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT
*Those businesses should be avoided!*

Let such businesses die a swift and painful death.

Give your business to someone who deserves it!

50 posted on 01/16/2014 10:30:54 AM PST by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson