Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rosemary’s Baby: A Warning to the Curious
Crisis Magazine ^ | January 17, 2014 | K. V. Turley

Posted on 01/17/2014 4:39:15 AM PST by NYer


Unexpectedly, I came across a reference to NBC re-making Rosemary’s Baby into a four-hour mini-series; press reports suggest that shooting has already begun this month. With this news, a fear began to grip as my thoughts returned to the original.

Strange tales grow up around movies. Like many before and since, Rosemary’s Baby has had its fair share. There is one, however, regarding that 1968 movie that to this day, continues to disquiet, revealing as it does a tale seemingly darker than that which transpired upon the screen.

Sharon Tate was one of the “faces” of the 1960s—like Christie and Bardot; she too had “the look.” Her star has somewhat faded now, but she was fast becoming an intrinsic part of that decade. Born into a middle class Catholic family in California, she was to hear Hollywood’s siren call—from then her path was set. At precisely the same time as another was making his way there with a similar goal, albeit from a very different place. A Polish Jew named Roman Polanski had forged, with one film, a reputation as a director of promise in his native land. Now, with an eye to the international stage, he was coming to London, just as Tate was arriving in England to film her first major role: playing the part of a witch in the Eye of the Devil (1966). Decisively, their paths were to cross.

Eye of the DevilPolanski’s London based film, Repulsion (1965), marked out the young Pole still further. It starred another 60s icon, Catherine Deneuve (similar in looks to Tate) who played an isolated young woman going slowly mad in a South Kensington apartment, before a frenzied killing with an axe. At the time, it was to be as disturbing a piece of cinema as it was to prove successful with critics and audiences alike. Cinema was throwing off moral constraints at the perceived dawning of a new age, and films such as Polanski’s, with recurring themes of murder, madness, and the supernatural were to be in the vanguard of this emerging order.

Thereafter, a very 1960s affair ensued between the now lovers, Tate and Polanski—she wanting marriage and children, while he wanting his “freedom” and her. The Spirit of the Age dictated that she acquiesce, which she duly did. International celebrity for both followed, becoming one of Cinema’s “Golden Couples” in the process. Inevitably after the success of his European films, Polanski was beckoned to America with a view to making his first U.S. film: Rosemary’s Baby—based upon the 1967 best-selling novel by Ira Levin. Unsurprisingly, Tate was his first choice to play the lead—a plan, later, aborted. Nevertheless, the stage was inexorably being set.

Still to this day, Rosemary’s Baby (1968) is a chilling movie. The plot is of an actor who sacrifices his wife’s fecundity to evil so that his career subsequently flourishes; and flourish it does. I remember the first time I saw it on television, one Halloween in the late 1970s. Even then, I realized that this was a strangely different sort of “horror” film to any I had thus far experienced, and a long way from the studios of Universal and Hammer. Here was something distinct, and with a peculiar feel that disturbed. Barely a teenager, I wasn’t sure why. Over thirty years later, I watched the movie again—it disturbed me even more than it had that first time, only now I began to understand.

For a start, until the late 1960s, there had never been a Hollywood film where evil triumphed so blatantly; and what evil, nothing less than the birth of the Anti-Christ. There are, of course, many other, more subtle (and all the more disquieting for that) hints of evil suffused throughout—for example, the real 1966 Time Magazine cover asking: “Is God Dead?” And the use of actual footage of Pope Paul VI’s visit to New York City in 1965, with its accompanying mocking by the now Satanist husband to his still nominally Catholic wife, Rosemary. Other, more lurid, attacks on the Church are present. Be in no doubt, a palpable darkness pervades this movie from the start.

And then, there is Rosemary: an innocent cut adrift, the slowly crumbling, unknowing mother-to-be—brilliantly played by Mia Farrow—isolated, spiritually as well as physically, increasingly alarmed at the realization that she can trust no-one. As the net continues to tighten, we watch with equal unease, knowing her predicament is far worse than she could ever have imagined. In this horror movie, like none before, there is to be no escape for Rosemary. For this is a truly nightmarish plot from start to dire finish, ending as it does with that final scene’s infernal adoration ringing out: “Hail Satan!”

Rosemary's BabyA frequent visitor to the set of Rosemary’s Baby, Tate was the subject of a series of photographs taken at the time by Esquire. In retrospect, these images appear as eerie as the movie itself. Moreover, a peculiar conversation took place shortly after the movie’s completion, when she startled a friend by saying: “The Devil is beautiful. Most people think he’s ugly, but he’s not.” Curious words indeed, and spoken by one blinded by the entity of which she spoke—the Father of Lies—whose “beauty” was but a mask beyond which lay only Death.

Rosemary’s Baby burst onto cinema screens during the summer of 1968, only a handful of weeks before Humane Vitae also arrived, if to less thunderous applause. One taught the truths of human life and love, the other was but a nefarious parody; one caught the Zeitgeist and was lauded, the other pilloried. Nevertheless, both were prophetic, and in their very different ways marked the beginning of a battle for more than just the soul of Hollywood.

Needless to say, the film was released to great critical and commercial success. At the New York premiere one woman did cry: “Blasphemy!”—she was mocked. The Catholic League of Decency, by then on its last legs, tried to protest but was immediately dismissed—the tide had turned.

Meanwhile, Polanski’s career “took off.” The future must indeed have looked golden; and yet, while the director and his now wife were making their new home in the hills over Hollywood, every move was being scrutinized. Unfortunately for them, the eyes so doing were those of a madman, by the name of Charles Manson. Manson, a self-styled “guru,” and his followers—”The Family”—were deranged, but, more worryingly still, they lusted after blood.

And so it was, on August 9, 1969, just as the clocks struck midnight, wishing “to do the work of the Devil”—as was their later boast—”The Family” in a packed automobile made for the Santa Monica Mountains: having already decided who was to be their next victim.

With Polanski absent, this murderous cabal smashed their way into the young couple’s home. It was there that the “blood sacrifice” was to be offered—two in fact, for Tate was heavily pregnant. That night, like the fictional mother at the close of Rosemary’s Baby, Sharon Tate was also robbed of what lay in her womb, as well as of life itself; and, as was the case with Rosemary, by chanting men and women who claimed to worship the Evil One—only this was no fiction, but, instead, all too real.

It is an old and wise maxim not to dabble in “things” of the Occult. One foolishly forgotten in these days when such powers are naively played with, looked upon as nothing but “harmless fun,” and therefore invoked unwittingly.

Still, even for non-believers, it would seem at least prudent to leave such things well alone. On that dreadful night, Sharon Tate may well have thought so. In those last minutes of life, we can only surmise what thoughts flooded her mind. Possibly they turned to her husband’s first American film?

Later, at the trial of her murderers, it was revealed that her last cry was but one word: “Mother.” A call for help, perhaps a reference to that earlier film, or, was it a prayer? It is hoped before the final blow fell, with assailants impervious to her cries for mercy, that Sharon Marie Tate gasped at least one plea for Divine Mercy. For, foolishly, she too had joined, however tangentially, with those assembled Satanists in welcoming their “Lord” into this realm in that final scene of Rosemary’s Baby, and was now hearing the diabolic echo of that earlier cry of “Hail…”—only this time it was sealing not the fate of Rosemary’s baby, but that of her own.

For here, truly revealed at last, was the Father of Lies, a murderer from the beginning.

Editor’s note: The MGM studio caption for the above scene from “Eye of the Devil” (1966) reads: “Devil worshiper Sharon Tate offers a white dove, killed in flight by an archer’s arrow, as sacrifice to the demands of the unholy “13″ tribunal.”

TOPICS: Religion; Society; TV/Movies; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: catholic; crisismagazine; encyclical; kvturley; polanski; romanpolanski; rosemarysbaby; satanists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2014 4:39:15 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...


2 posted on 01/17/2014 4:39:37 AM PST by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Read later.

3 posted on 01/17/2014 4:41:28 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Lucifer + Lenin =
4 posted on 01/17/2014 4:55:49 AM PST by Travis McGee (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Devil Baby Attack
5 posted on 01/17/2014 5:02:53 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (Mia San Mia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Why do people want to watch movies like this? I have never understood & all these years later, I still don’t.

6 posted on 01/17/2014 5:11:20 AM PST by KGeorge (Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have never seen “Rosemary’s Baby.” Horror movies have never really appealed to me other than the “classics” from the 1930s. But there was also the premise of this film that was repulsive to me even when it came out.

7 posted on 01/17/2014 5:13:33 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

the writer incorrectly states Manson knew Roman and Tate lived at the house.
But , the facts were a record producer who met and turned down Manson at that home owned the place and moved out and rented it out just before the murder.
The producer was Doris Day’s son and his live in girlfriend was Candace Bergen .
Reportedly ,Manson thought the couple still lived there !

8 posted on 01/17/2014 5:15:08 AM PST by ncalburt ( Amnesty-media out in full force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Then Polanski drugged and raped a 13 year old.

9 posted on 01/17/2014 5:16:40 AM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Seen it a few times. Never really cared for it.
There were quite a few movies of this genre released in the late '60s through the mid-70s.
Only one that really freaked me out was 'The Exorcist.'
That one was disturbing. Just happened that at the time I was doing undergrad work and reading some books by, and about, a guy named Anton Szandor LaVey.
That did not help at all.
Later met the guy at his shop in San Francisco. Creepy and...well, as weird as one might expect.
But not "frightening" as I expected he might be.
10 posted on 01/17/2014 5:16:54 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

Yeah, but it wasn’t rape-rape.

11 posted on 01/17/2014 5:34:26 AM PST by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

A door is opened to the occult when people elect to view these kind of movies.

12 posted on 01/17/2014 5:45:57 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I don’t think Rosemary’s Baby or Repulsion had anything to do with the Manson Killings. Both are classic horror films. And I wouldn’t compare Deneuve’s talent to the somewhat incompetent acting of Sharon Tate. Perhaps it was Valley of the Dolls that brought about the most horrible crime of the 1960s! Horror stories have always been with us and always will be.

It breaks my heart that Sharon Tate was obviously calling for her mother during her final moments.

Personally, I prefer the great work of those “horror” masters Val Lewton and Jacque Tournier.

13 posted on 01/17/2014 5:48:16 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Wow. This review will probably generate a lot of ticket sales.

““The Devil is beautiful. Most people think he’s ugly, but he’s not.” Curious words indeed, and spoken by one blinded by the entity of which she spoke—the Father of Lies—whose “beauty” was but a mask beyond which lay only Death.”

Huh? Of course the devil is beautiful...or at least can be. People wouldn’t be attracted to a disgusting, Obama-looking demon. Oh...wait. What DO they see in him? OR! Maybe libtards do see a handsome, beautiful person and thinking, God-fearing, patriots see Obama as he really is. I mean, seriously, Obama? Good looking? BWAHAHAhahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaha.....

14 posted on 01/17/2014 5:49:17 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

You’re right re: the author being wrong about Manson knowing who was in the house. It was a rental property, and did not belong to Polanski or Tate. Manson knew about the house because Beach Boys drummer Dennis Wilson had once rented it, and allowed Manson & his Family to stay there for a while. They ended up taking it over, and Wilson moved out of his own place just to get away from them.

Manson later moved to the ‘ranch’ in the desert. He returned to Wilson’s former rental to commit murder [rather, to have his Family do it for him] not because he knew the identity of the current renters but because the place was a familiar one.

15 posted on 01/17/2014 5:58:34 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

If it’s any consolation, LaVey, usually when drunk, would let it slip that he was a just in it for the money “and benefits”, as it were, from the endless parade of naive suckers who went out of their way to hang out with him.

Not being a fool himself, as well as a former carny (carnival worker), he was always careful to carry a gun. Much of his philosophy was borrowed from disparate and often conflicting sources, generally secular, but he was also skilled in psychic fakery, like fortune telling. By all accounts he was well read and a good orator.

Perhaps his best talent was in not overdoing things that could get him in trouble. I don’t think he was ever arrested for anything, did not play politics, so that even when politicians expressed interest in Satanism, he kept it at the cocktail party level.

16 posted on 01/17/2014 6:13:01 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Obama is Satan’s cheap counterfeit of John the Baptist.

17 posted on 01/17/2014 6:14:19 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have never seen the movie, nor do I ever intend to. Any time I see a depiction of a demon in print or on the screen, I turn away, as I do not want nightmares.

The writer is correct, I fear, that there are far too many dabbling in the occult.

18 posted on 01/17/2014 6:18:21 AM PST by Bigg Red (O LORD, our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth! Ps 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

***”The Devil is beautiful. Most people think he’s ugly, but he’s not.” ***

Eze 28:13

Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.

Eze 28:14

Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.

Eze 28:15

Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.

19 posted on 01/17/2014 8:29:06 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

The saddist photo I’ve seen is of a Marine honor guard standing over the coffin of a Marine killed in Vietnam, while LaVey, in his robes and getup was shaking some short of rattle over the coffin.

It appeared the Marine had claimed to be a satanist on his tags.

20 posted on 01/17/2014 8:34:18 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson