Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lankford to run for Coburn's Senate seat [Oklahoma House Speaker T.W. Shannon gets nods to run]
The Hill ^ | January 19, 2014 | Alexandra Jaffe

Posted on 01/20/2014 3:46:16 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Just days after Sen. Tom Coburn’s (R-Okla.) announcement that he’ll retire at the end of the year, the race to replace him began to settle with Rep. James Lankford (R) expected to announce his decision to run at a Monday-afternoon press conference, sources tell The Hill.

Rep. Tom Cole (R) announced in a Sunday-night press release that he will not run, citing his seniority in the House. The state’s attorney general, Scott Pruitt (R), also announced in a Sunday Facebook post he won’t run.

The decisions of Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R) and Oklahoma House Speaker T.W. Shannon still remain unclear. Sources tell The Hill Bridenstine may be leaning against a run after receiving some discouragement from local conservatives, while Shannon is now “strongly considering” the race.

The Hill reported on Friday that Lankford had been calling colleagues as early as Thursday night, when Coburn announced his plans to retire at the end of the year, to gauge their support. One source indicated Coburn plans to endorse Lankford for his seat, a development that would catapult him to the front of the primary pack and provide him with some credibility with skeptical conservatives in the special election to replace him.

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin's office announced Friday that a special will be scheduled to run concurrently with this year's regularly scheduled elections, setting up an April filing deadline and a primary fight for June with an August runoff if necessary.

The Oklahoman first reported Lankford’s decision on Sunday night.

Cole said in a statement he felt he could do more good for his state in the House than the Senate, where seniority typically reigns supreme.

“My seniority, my membership on three major committees, my position as a subcommittee chairman on the Appropriations Committee and my role as a Deputy Whip in the Republican Conference make me much more valuable to Oklahoma and the Fourth District in the House than I could be as a freshman U.S. Senator,” he said.

He also said that he’s looking forward to “helping nominate and elect another well-qualified conservative” in the race.

Pruitt said on Facebook that he’s planning to remain attorney general because he feels he can do more good in the state.

“At present, my choice is clear: it is serving as Oklahoma's Attorney General, where I can continue to lead the fight for the preservation of our freedoms and constitutional system,” he said.

One source tells The Hill that Shannon may be moving closer to running after receiving a “tremendous amount” of encouragement from local and national conservative groups over the past few days.

If he chooses to run, he would likely compete for the position as the conservative alternative to Lankford in the race, and would easily take up that mantle if Bridenstine chose not to run.

Shannon has strong ties to the state’s Baptist community, which could eat into one of Lankford’s advantages, and would draw support from Oklahoma’s Native American population, as he is part Chickasaw.

As a onetime aide to former Rep. J.C. Watts, Shannon could count on Watts’s starpower and fundraising support if he chooses to run and Watts — who is also considering the race — stayed out.

The state House speaker's bid would put Cole in a tough spot. Shannon worked as a staffer to the congressman, but Cole also has a close relationship with Lankford, who has looked to him as a mentor of sorts since coming to Washington.

Cole, with his deep connections throughout Oklahoma and the considerable local and national fundraising base he cultivated during his time as National Republican Congressional Committee chairman, would give either candidate a significant boost with his endorsement.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 113th; 2014midterms; bridenstine; coburn; gopprimary; jameslankford; jimbridenstine; maryfallin; ok2014; okla; oklahoma; scottpruitt; shannon; tomcoburn; tomcole; twshannon; ussenate

1 posted on 01/20/2014 3:46:16 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Bridenstine will help Ted Cruz in the Senate.


2 posted on 01/20/2014 3:54:00 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; Clintonfatigued; Impy; Clemenza; randita

*OK Senate race ping*


3 posted on 01/20/2014 3:56:58 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

I’m not familiar with the field.


4 posted on 01/20/2014 3:59:40 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

As long as a real conservative wins I’m for it.


5 posted on 01/20/2014 5:07:50 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

who is the congressman from Tulsa? Is that Bridenstine?


6 posted on 01/20/2014 5:43:58 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I don’t know how you find a better candidate than Bridenstine.

Of course, the ultimate test will be who the NRSC, Karl Rove, and Mitch McConnell do NOT support.


7 posted on 01/20/2014 6:01:17 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; All
FYI: Red State's Erick Erickson strongly endorses Bridenstine , says conservatives need to rally around him..
8 posted on 01/20/2014 6:15:46 AM PST by ken5050 (This space available cheap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Shannon's profile page:

http://www.okhouse.gov/District.aspx?District=62

9 posted on 01/20/2014 6:15:57 AM PST by OKSooner ("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Bridenstine has bucked leadership and gone his own way is my understanding of his record.

That might be a dream pick.

Lankford SEEMS like a good second.

I don’t know anything about the others.


10 posted on 01/20/2014 6:26:02 AM PST by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear. -Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; All

I’m not gonna predict, but I’ll say... don’t be surprised if Governor Fallin endorses TW Shannon.


11 posted on 01/20/2014 6:29:24 AM PST by OKSooner ("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

I know very little about OK politics..but I expect that Fallon stays out of it..that’s the smart course...why make enemies?


12 posted on 01/20/2014 6:47:44 AM PST by ken5050 (This space available cheap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

“Of course, the ultimate test will be who the NRSC, Karl Rove, and Mitch McConnell do NOT support.”


So how does this work? It is undisputed that Speaker T.W. Shannon is more conservative than Congressman Lankford. However, Shannon is also a conservative rising star, being a young, charismatic, experienced candidate who happens to be both black and Native American, so I can see Rove and McConnell supporting him because they know he’d win the general handily and would become a national star for the GOP. Would those endorsements suddenly turn Shannon into a RINO? Would they make Shannon’s down-the-line-conservative positions any less conservative?

We should judge candidates based on their merits (which include experience and their deeds matching their words), not blacklist those who someone we distrust endorses. Remember, a stopped clock is right twice a day, and Rove and McConnell could support (and have supported) candidates in spite of such candidates’ principled conservatism because they think that it’s a good electoral choice. Rove and McConnell are in the business of winning elections, not losing them, so if they see a conservative as a winner they’ll back the conservative. (Their problem is that often they refuse to see conservatives as potential winners, but even they can recognize that Shannon is a budding megastar.)


13 posted on 01/20/2014 7:09:38 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what ma kes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Hasn’t Watts turned left? I’m not sure.


14 posted on 01/20/2014 7:49:21 AM PST by Theodore R. (TX Republicans can't wait until March 4 to nominate Cornball and George P.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

“Rove and McConnell are in the business of winning elections, not losing them, so if they see a conservative as a winner they’ll back the conservative”

They are in the business of electing establishment Republicans, as is the NRSC.

Did McConnell back Rand Paul or Trey Grayson? Did the NRSC back Rubio or Crist? Cruz or Dewhurst? Is Rove backing conservatives over moderates? What was Rove’s track record in winning in 2012 with huge amounts of money at his disposal?

Shannon may be a good guy. I know nothing about him. But I do know that Bridenstine had the guts to vote against Boehner for Speaker. Where does Shannon stand on that? I know that the Senate Conservatives Fund, Madison Project, and Eric Erickson are urging Bridenstine to run, and for good reason. I know McConnell has declared war on Tea Party candidates and is using the NRSC to carry out that war.

If you don’t see a trend in the type of candidate backed by Rove, McConnell, and the NRSC, you haven’t been paying attention. If they back a conservative, it’s likely because they couldn’t get a squish to step up.


15 posted on 01/20/2014 8:05:12 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Well, you’re right that Rove and McConnell won’t support Bridenstine in the primary, but since it appears that Bridenstine won’t be running the question is academic.

If Lankford, Shannon and Bridenstine it is unlikely that any of them will get to 50%+1, thus necessitating a run-off. You’re obviously committed to Bridenstine, and will support him in the first round. But if there’s a Shannon-Lankford runoff, I would hope that you will analyze both candidates’ records and support the one whom you believe will do the best job in the Senate (electability shouldn’t be an issue with those two, and place the odds of winning the general at 99% for Shannon and 95% for Lankford), and not reflexively support the one who didn’t get the Rove or McConnell endorsement.


16 posted on 01/20/2014 8:16:40 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what ma kes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
Rove and McConnell are in the business of winning elections, not losing them, so if they see a conservative as a winner they’ll back the conservative.

Garbage!

Rove and McConnell are in the business of winning elections with candidates that their big-money corporate campaign donors like, period.

This isn't about the GOP, it's about Corporate Cronyism.
17 posted on 01/20/2014 8:47:44 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Ah, it appears that “Defenders of the GOPe Favorites” have begun appearing.


18 posted on 01/20/2014 8:48:16 AM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

“if there’s a Shannon-Lankford runoff, I would hope that you will analyze both candidates’ records and support the one whom you believe will do the best job in the Senate (electability shouldn’t be an issue with those two, and place the odds of winning the general at 99% for Shannon and 95% for Lankford), and not reflexively support the one who didn’t get the Rove or McConnell endorsement.”

I’m not an Okie, and don’t know Shannon and Lankford. I do contribute to various races through the Senate Conservatives Fund. I agree with your analysis that one shouldn’t blackball a candidate solely because Rove might back him. If you know enough about the candidate to know he is solidly conservative, by all means back him. It’s just that I’ve seen Rove, McConnell, et al. shove knives in the backs of conservatives so many times that when I see one of them endorse a candidate red lights go off.


19 posted on 01/20/2014 9:52:49 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

So Speaker Shannon is a “GOPe Favorite”? LOL! Establishment folks will back him just as they will back anyone who would be an electoral powerhouse, but, believe me, he’s the real deal. Oh, but if by “GOPe” you mean anyone who has ever held elective office, then Speaker Shannon is guilty as charged, as is Congressman Bridenstine.

I will support whichever candidate will be most effective in achieving conservative victories for the American people. If someone less conservative than me supports the same candidate (and, believe me, not many are *more* conservative than me), I won’t spit on such person’s face, much less refuse to support someone with a proven record of championing conservative principles. I’m looking for candidates who will walk the walk, not simply talk the talk, so I am attracted by Speaker Shannon’s voting record and legislative leadership of the very conservative OK House, plus his unique ability to grow the conservative movement.


20 posted on 01/20/2014 10:23:15 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what ma kes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Do you really think that McConnell doesn’t care if the GOP retakes the Senate? That’s the *one* thing he cares about.

McConnell wants the GOP to win, as does Rove. While it is a fact that they have different ideas than we do about what kind of candidate can win (which is why he’s pissed at the Tea Party movement, which he blames for leading to GOP losses in several winnable Senate races), it is nonetheless true that sometimes the candidate with the most solid conservative record happens to be the one that they feel will have the easiest time winning (and will help the most with fundraising once elected).


21 posted on 01/20/2014 10:31:14 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what ma kes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Oh, and I “began appearing” on FR in 2002.


22 posted on 01/20/2014 10:33:28 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what ma kes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; ConservativeDude

Yes, Bridenstein is the Tea Party conservative that defeated long time incumbent John Sullivan. He’s a freshman Rep but will take the seat


23 posted on 01/20/2014 10:56:55 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

So, who do you like for Bridenstine’s seat, then??


24 posted on 01/20/2014 1:28:24 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
Bridenstine will help Ted Cruz in the Senate.

"Sources tell The Hill Bridenstine may be leaning against a run after receiving some discouragement from local conservatives, while Shannon is now “strongly considering” the race."

25 posted on 01/20/2014 1:36:40 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
and provide him with some credibility with skeptical conservatives

If conservatives are skeptical of Lankford, there is probably good reason

26 posted on 01/20/2014 1:48:07 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Erickson is not the most popular guy around here


27 posted on 01/20/2014 1:48:48 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
“Rove and McConnell are in the business of winning elections, not losing them, so if they see a conservative as a winner they’ll back the conservative”

lolz

Attacking conservatives and undermining them is what they do best

28 posted on 01/20/2014 1:50:27 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Yeah, but the same ‘sources’ said Sullivam was not in trouble and would easily win re-election. The conservative anger here in OK is very strong.


29 posted on 01/20/2014 1:51:48 PM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Run Shannon run.


30 posted on 01/20/2014 2:16:41 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

JC Watts is living happily ever after on his ranch in south central Oklahoma, which is a decision most of us support.


31 posted on 01/20/2014 6:05:24 PM PST by OKSooner ("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Yes, nothing against Erick Erickson but does he really think ANYONE in Oklahoma - ANYONE?? Is going to vote either in a Republican primary or in a general election according to what he says or opines?

We'll vote for who we damn well please, thank you, and that goes almost as much for Tom Coburn's opinion too, at least so far as I'm concerned.

As for myself, I'm inclined to favor Shannon over Lankford, and hope for Bridenstein to stay out of it and keep his seat in the house. Shannon's the real deal.

The commu- excuse me, the Democrats would be salivating over that seat, they've been grooming their own answer to Nancy Pelosi in the State House, representing a district in central Tulsa that's overly infested with people of that ilk.

32 posted on 01/20/2014 6:17:54 PM PST by OKSooner ("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

“So Speaker Shannon is a “GOPe Favorite”?...”
******************************************************

Didn’t Mama tell you that “assumption is the mother of all ‘foul’ ups”?

I didn’t say that Shannon was the GOPe favorite, as you well know. The GOPe favorite is, as you above all should know, Lankford.

That’s who ALL true conservatives want to defeat in the primary, correct?


33 posted on 01/21/2014 6:48:13 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

So I write a post saying that Shannon is a conservative irrespective of who may endorse him, you write a reply accusing me of being a “defender of the GOPe,” and now you claim that you weren’t talking about Shannon, but about *Lankford* (whom I didn’t even mention)? Okey-dokey.

I want OK to elect the U.S. Senator whop would be most effective in advancing conservative principles. I happen to believe that T.W. Shannon would be that man, and if he runs, I will support him. If Bridenstine runs as well, and there’s a run-off between Bridenstine and Lankford, I’d support Bridenstine, but that’s highly speculative at this point.

And my point, which I guess I have to repeat, is that I don’t give a rat’s behind who Karl Rove or Mitch McConnell endorse, because I can think for myself, and will judge a candidate based on his record, not on who has endorsed him. Well, that’s not entirely true—I will consider who has endorsed him, but only as guidance, and not as something that trumps a candidate’s clear record. And, truth be told, as much as I dislike Rove’s brand of politics, Rove’s endorsement would not cause me as much revulsion as would an endorsement by that anti-Semitic, un-American L. Ron Paul, and even a Paul endorsement won’t deter me from voting for someone if he is a proven conservative and doesn’t appear to be a Paultard.


34 posted on 01/21/2014 7:08:50 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

“So I write a post saying that Shannon is a conservative irrespective of who may endorse him, you write a reply accusing me of being a “defender of the GOPe,”...”
******************************************************************

I wasn’t reacting to anything you wrote regarding Shannon...I was reacting to these words from your post in item 13:

“Rove and McConnell are in the business of winning elections, not losing them, so if they see a conservative as a winner they’ll back the conservative.”

Given a choice between a RINO wannabe and a conservative candidate in a given primary, Rove and McConnell (along with the RNC) have a track record of usually choosing the RINO. IMHO, they choose the RINO because they expect him/her to “go along to get along” (and NOT make trouble for the GOPe rulers in DC) if they get to Washington.

And I truly believe that Rove and McConnell are more about their position, their power and their income than they are about winning elections. If they think that a man of integrity and principle such as Ted Cruz would not “cooperate” with them, they’ll support a RINO opponent—every time. And if there is a TRUE conservative (who may not “go along to get along”) in an election facing a Democrat, their support of that conservative will be tepid at best (e.g., Ken Cuccinelli).


35 posted on 01/21/2014 7:53:13 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

I don’t disagree that it seems that Rove and McConnell prefer RINOs to conservatives when making endorsements, but at least in the case of McConnell (and probably in the case of Rove as well) I don’t think that he’d endorse someone whom he thought was less electable just because he was more liberal. And even if I’m wrong and the two prefer RINOs to conservatives to the exclusion of just about everything else, it is still possible that they’d endorse Shannon over the less conservative Lankford because it’s good for business to support a black conservative officeholder who will be going places irrespective of what happens in the Senate election.

Going back to my original point, the fact that Rove and McConnell endorse someone does not ipso facto make that candidate a RINO. We can determine for ourselves who is conservative and who isn’t based on their words and (most importantly) their deeds. I mean, you already know that Lankford isn’t a true conservative and Shannon and Bridenstine are, and no RINO has endorsed yet.


36 posted on 01/21/2014 8:41:41 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Is Lankford for legalization of illegals?


37 posted on 01/22/2014 2:54:47 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson