Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Obama and Iran warn] Republican Senate takeover could kill Iran nuclear agreement
The Hill ^ | January 23, 2014 | Julian Pecquet

Posted on 01/23/2014 4:08:14 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

A Republican takeover of the Senate this fall could scuttle one of President Obama’s biggest second term goals — a nuclear deal with Iran.

Republicans have lambasted the interim agreement with Iran, calling for the Senate to move an Iran sanctions bill. The House last year passed a measure in an overwhelming and bipartisan 400-20 vote. Both the Obama administration and Iran have warned moving such a measure could kill a final deal.

A number of Democrats have also criticized the interim accord, which lifted $6 billion in sanctions on Iran in exchange for a commitment to restrictions on enriching uranium.

Critics in both parties say the deal gave away too much for Iran.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has given Obama cover by refusing to bring sanctions legislation to the floor.

If Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) becomes majority leader, sanctions legislation could move quickly to the floor and could attract a veto-proof majority.

“If Republicans held the majority, we would have voted already; with Democrats in charge, Harry Reid denies the American people the bipartisan diplomatic insurance policy they deserve,” a senior Republican Senate aide complained.

The aide suggested Republicans will use the issue of Iran to show how a GOP-run Senate would differ with the status quo.

“So the question really is, what kind of Senate would people rather have — one that puts politics over good policy, or one that holds Iran accountable and works overtime to prevent a world with Iranian nuclear weapons?” the aide asked.

A total of 59 senators — 16 Democrats and every Republican save two — have co-sponsored the sanctions bill from Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.).

Republicans need to gain six seats to win back the majority, something definitely within their grasp this year. The party is a solid favorite to pick up seats in West Virginia, South Dakota and Montana, and believes it can also secure wins in Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana and North Carolina.

The administration has pleaded with members of both parties to hold back on sanctions against Iran, presenting the deal as a chance at history.

“We haven’t had an opportunity like this probably in the history of our dealings with Iran on its nuclear program, and quite frankly, we don’t know when we would have another one,” State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said this week after the interim deal with Iran went into effect on Monday. “All of our partners and we are united in the belief that we have an obligation to test this diplomatic moment, as difficult as it is, and to not do things in any of our capitals that would make that more difficult.”

The pending legislation calls for sanctions to kick in if Iran reneges on the terms of the interim deal, which is scheduled to last six months. It would still be timely next year after a new Congress is sworn in, however, because the bill also sets standards that any final deal must meet.

Specifically, the bill demands that the final deal “dismantle Iran's illicit nuclear infrastructure, including enrichment and reprocessing capabilities and facilities … so that Iran is precluded from a nuclear breakout capability and prevented from pursuing both uranium and plutonium pathways to a nuclear weapon.”

Some experts say the bill in effect demands that Iran be denied any right to enrich uranium, which negotiators say is unacceptable.

Obama has hinted zero enrichment isn't in the cards.

“Now, you’ll hear arguments, including potentially from the [Israeli] Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu], that say we can’t accept any enrichment on Iranian soil. Period. Full stop. End of conversation,” the president said in a speech at the Brookings Institution last month. “It is my strong belief that we can envision an end state that gives us an assurance that even if they have some modest enrichment capability, it is so constrained and the inspections are so intrusive that they, as a practical matter, do not have breakout capacity.”

Not all Democrats are worried that a Senate flip would doom the deal.

Iran hasn't emerged as an issue in mid-term elections dominated by ObamaCare and the economy, so Republicans won't be under great pressure to act if they do win. And if a final deal — however imperfect — is reached, Republicans might have a hard time defending a vote that the administration will most likely frame as a path to war.

“If against all odds there is a deal and we have some sort of peaceful, diplomatic track toward stopping Iran's nuclear program, it would seem to me that legislation that might blow up that process would be so problematic that hopefully the Republicans wouldn't even go there,” said Tommy Vietor, the former spokesman for Obama's National Security Council and now a principal with consulting firm Fenway Strategies.

McConnell has vowed to “continue to press the majority leader to allow a vote” on the Iran sanctions bill. But a McConnell spokesman on Wednesday pointedly refused to commit to a roll call if Republicans take over.

“While the Leader obviously supports the bipartisan legislation and believes it should be brought to the floor as soon as possible, it’s impossible to know what the situation with Iran will be a year from now, so I can’t give you an answer on what legislation will be needed or considered a year from now,” the spokesman told The Hill. “It’s just impossible to predict the unpredictable, so I’m sorry, I don’t have an answer for you on that.”


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: gopsenate; iran; israel; lebanon; middleeast; nuclear; syria; waronterror
Iranian official on nuke deal: 'We did not agree to dismantle anything' "(CNN) -- Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif insisted Wednesday that the Obama administration mischaracterizes concessions by his side in the six-month nuclear deal with Iran, telling CNN in an exclusive interview that "we did not agree to dismantle anything."

Zarif told CNN Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Sciutto that terminology used by the White House to describe the agreement differed from the text agreed to by Iran and the other countries in the talks -- the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany.

"The White House version both underplays the concessions and overplays Iranian commitments" under the agreement that took effect Monday, Zarif said in Davos, Switzerland, where he was attending the World Economic Forum.

As part of the accord, Iran was required to dilute its stockpile of uranium that had been enriched to 20%, well above the 5% level needed for power generation but still below the level for developing a nuclear weapon.

In addition, the deal mandated that Iran halt all enrichment above 5% and "dismantle the technical connections required to enrich above 5%," according to a White House fact sheet issued in November after the initial agreement was reached.

Zarif accused the Obama administration of creating a false impression with such language............................"

1 posted on 01/23/2014 4:08:14 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The Tyrant ROUTINELY lies to the American people.

And the whoring, treasonous, hated, EXEMPT US Congress
LOVES him for it.


2 posted on 01/23/2014 4:15:16 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

As the Iranian scientists “tease the dragon’s tail” they may get a surprise they had not counted on.

Fried Crispy Critters on a Glass Parking Lot.


3 posted on 01/23/2014 4:18:02 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Even if the Republicans take over the senate the Democrats will filibuster any sanctions bill.


4 posted on 01/23/2014 4:20:54 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Will Democrats really go back to the old scare tactic they used against Goldwater (successfully) and Reagan (unsuccessfully) that Republicans will cause war? They are really desperate.

Maybe we’ll see bumper stickers with “Vote Democrat for the Ayatollahs!”


5 posted on 01/23/2014 4:22:25 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Hopefully this is becoming apparent to more people.


6 posted on 01/23/2014 4:23:57 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Actually, the last thing I’d want to see after Harry Reid running the Senate....is for McConnell to run the Senate. Frankly, McConnell needs to go...as does McCain.


7 posted on 01/23/2014 4:27:56 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

There is no near agreement as long as those centrifuges are up and running.


8 posted on 01/23/2014 4:28:13 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is a horrible pickle. I wish Obama would shut his mouth. If Obama starts saying something like “Well you guys give the Republicans the Senate, McCain is going to want to go to war with Iran”. That would be horrible for Republicans. I have no doubt that McCain would want this if we get the Senate. Obama needs to shut the heck up about this NOW!!!!!! OR we need to have Republicans come out and say that we won’t go to war with Iran. The population does not want another war. I know that much and that includes many conservatives.


9 posted on 01/23/2014 4:29:14 AM PST by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Time for tem limits


10 posted on 01/23/2014 4:43:53 AM PST by ozdragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
11 posted on 01/23/2014 4:49:33 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozdragon

OH, NOES!!!!!! Iran, Satan’s most influential empire, is going to tell us how to vote?????? OH, NOES!!!!!!


12 posted on 01/23/2014 4:50:21 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I don’t think the Rats have a thing to worry about. The GOPe will not win the Senate this year because Chinless is kicking the Tea Partiers out.


13 posted on 01/23/2014 4:53:19 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

One more reason to vote for the Republicans.


14 posted on 01/23/2014 4:54:19 AM PST by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of "gun free zones"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

But wait, President Rouhani vehemently declares there has been no agreement. Who do we believe? :)


15 posted on 01/23/2014 5:01:05 AM PST by ImNotLying (The Right To Bear Arms: Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

That is a true winner, the cartoon I mean.


16 posted on 01/23/2014 5:02:18 AM PST by ImNotLying (The Right To Bear Arms: Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Who is the fool that believes that any agreement with Iran will be lived up to by Iran?

Iran has no such concerns for Obama, because they both hate Israel and America.


17 posted on 01/23/2014 5:13:21 AM PST by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImNotLying; ETL; All
Report: Obama Admin. Worries Israel Is Riling Up the Jews "The Obama administration is worried that Israel is riling up American Jews, according to a report in the Israeli press. The allegations are detailed in a story headlined, "'US perceives Israel as encouraging anti-Obama backlash among Jews,'" which appears in the Jerusalem Post.

The Post report reads, "A US official close to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry said both men are disturbed over what is being perceived in their inner circle as 'Jewish activism in Congress' that they think is being encouraged by the Israeli government, Israel Radio reported on Thursday............."

18 posted on 01/23/2014 5:34:58 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Israeli secret service ping..ooops oh no mr bill


19 posted on 01/23/2014 6:06:46 AM PST by aces (Jesus Saves not Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImNotLying

The mooselahs don’t care about no stinking agreement, silly infidel agreements are for the blind and weak.


20 posted on 01/23/2014 6:09:33 AM PST by aces (Jesus Saves not Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
This is a WARNING. If republicans can't take back the senate this year, 2016 may be too late.
21 posted on 01/23/2014 6:12:05 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aces

hee hee hee


22 posted on 01/23/2014 6:31:45 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

“Republican Senate takeover could kill Iran nuclear agreement”........

Yet another reason to vote the repubs in. Odumbo and his ilk were sooooooo screwed when they signed that so called “agreement”, it, along with odumbo’s group needs trash canning.


23 posted on 01/23/2014 6:45:22 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Best news I have heard today! All this agreement has done is to give iran what they want. In the best light iran has beat obama and kerry like a drum, in the worst it is just obama doing his masters bidding.


24 posted on 01/23/2014 7:55:44 AM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks Cincinatus' Wife. Looks like the media lapdogs have their CYA; Kerry has his alibi by talking tough, which nevertheless will never be mentioned again by anyone in media after the next Republican president has to deal with Iran because of this pinsetter operation by Kerry, Zero, et al, and Kerry shoots off his mouth *against* intervention; and the Iranians act like they've already had their sanctions lifted and didn't have to do anything to accomplish it.
25 posted on 01/25/2014 3:45:33 AM PST by SunkenCiv (;http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Kerry: Military Option Still On if Iran Doesn’t Keep Agreement

It's time for the world to see the 'agreement'... If we're going to die for it we have the right to see it.

26 posted on 01/25/2014 11:22:35 AM PST by GOPJ (Liberals never let something as petty as being 100% wrong stop them - Blood of Tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson