Skip to comments.Hollywood’s Muslim Lies
Posted on 01/24/2014 2:42:38 AM PST by servo1969
In real life, terrorists are almost always Muslim. In the movie theater, they are anything but. Americas fictional secret agents, covert operatives and rogue cops who play by their own rules have spent more time battling Serbian terrorists than Muslim terrorists.
Before September 11, 24′s Jack Bauer was fighting the international menace of Serbian terrorism. Serbian terrorists also showed up in 1999′s Diplomatic Siege when their Serbian Liberation Front took over a US embassy and in 1997′s The Peacemaker with George Clooney rushing to stop a Serb from detonating a nuke in New York City.
The United States has remained unscathed by Serbian terrorism, though the same cant be said for Peter Weller, the star of Diplomatic Siege, and Mimi Leder, the director of The Peacemaker, but not by Muslim terrorist attacks. Despite September 11, the Fort Hood Massacre and the Boston Marathon bombings, Hollywood has resolutely kept its eye on the real threat.
This weekend, Ride Along, which features Ice F___ the Police Cube playing a cop, knocked Lone Survivor out of the top spot at the box office, and once again takes on the terrible threat of Serbian terrorism.
When the Serbs arent available, the Russians have to step in. The Russians are more likely to appear as villains after the fall of the Soviet Union than during the Communist era. Its as if the end of Soviet Communism finally set Hollywood free to join in the fun of Boris and Natasha villains without any of the guilt about red-baiting.
When Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit featured a terrorist cell in Dearborn, even though Muslims dominate the area, the villains were shown operating out of a Russian Orthodox church and getting their cues from a priest reading the bible while the terrorists cried out, Slava Bogu or Praise God.
It would have been unrealistic to show them praising Allah instead.
Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit is the latest attempt at making a Tom Clancy movie without the Tom Clancy part. Sum of All Fears, one of the first movies about terrorism to come out after September 11, jettisoned Clancys Muslim villains.
Its writer Dan Pyne dismissed Islamic terrorism as a cliché; even though a plot cant be a cliché when it never appears in movies, only in real life. Pyne however found a more realistic villain. I think, there was some neo-nationalist activity in Holland, and there was stuff going on in Spain and in Italy. So it seemed like a logical and lasting idea that would be universal.
Nothing is more universal than the threat of neo-nationalists in Holland. Dutch neo-nationalism is an enduring world menace that everyone can relate to.
The neo-nationalists of the Netherlands that Pyne had discovered were probably Pim Fortuyns party. Fortuyn was a Sociology professor who favored drug legalization, gay marriage and less Muslim immigration. The neo-nationalist threat of the Netherlands did not prove lasting when around the time that Sum of All Fears was playing in theaters; Fortuyn was murdered by a leftist who, like Pyne, worried about the plight of the Muslims.
In an even bigger cliché, Theo van Gogh, who had just finished directing May 6th, a movie about the assassination of Pim Fortuyn, was murdered by Mohammed Bouyeri, a Muslim immigrant from Morocco who told the victims mother that he could have no empathy for her because she was a non-Muslim.
It was the sort of ridiculous cliché that Dan Pyne would never have put into a script.
Instead Dan Pyne went on to write a remake of the Manchurian Candidate in which Communist China was replaced by the Manchurian Corporation. Hes currently working on a movie featuring a Syrian rescue worker who gets mistaken for a terrorist while trying to save lives during Hurricane Katrina.
Its a cliché, but its the kind of cliché that Hollywood likes.
If a movie is made about September 11 a decade from, now, the villains will probably be Serbian nationalists. It would be a cliché to have 19 Muslim hijackers murder 3,000 people. And then the camera will linger meaningfully on a Muslim rescuer wrongly taken into custody by a bigoted NYPD cop who is overlooking the real Serbian/Dutch neo-nationalist corporate villains.
The Serbians, Russians and Netherlands neo-nationalists are only the understudies who get called in when the usual villains, right-wing extremists who want to false flag America into a war with the Muslims, are on vacation.
After 24 got done with the Serbian terror threat, it defaulted to the real threat of government warmongers trying to fake a Muslim terror threat. After 9/11, 24′s second seasons story was about an evil government conspiracy to fake a Muslim terrorist attack. Anything else would have been a cliché. And to avoid clichés, the series used variations of the same plot in three seasons.
When the Serbs went on strike last year, White House Down brought in a villainous Speaker of the House with a Jewish last name to assassinate a black president in order to sabotage his treaty with Iran. The movie lost so much money that Sony blamed its quarterly $197 million loss on it.
Serbian terrorism had struck again.
When a straightforward presentation flops, Hollywood finds ways of embedding the same old message into more fantastic fare. Last summer, Iron Man 3, Star Trek Into Darkness and the Lone Ranger all had minor variations of the same story about false flag attacks that were orchestrated by governments or powerful interests connected to them. This Trutherism explosion was just another case of Hollywood carefully avoiding clichés.
Nowhere in all these tales of evil corporations and governments is there a movie about an entertainment industry so intertwined with government that it not only helped pick the countrys current leader, but it constantly releases propaganda films attempting to revise reality according to his worldview. That would be a cliché; much like the idea of that industry filming false flag movies depicting the favorite villains of the Clinton Administration carrying out ridiculously implausible acts of terror to retroactively justify its focus on the Serbs instead of Al Qaeda.
Hollywood stands as firmly against depicting Muslim terrorism as Hollywood Communists after the Hitler-Stalin pact did against anti-Nazi films. If they had been positioned further up the ladder back then, instead of mainly being relegated to writing scripts, we would no doubt have a catalog of movies featuring Yankee warmongers plotting to stage fake Nazi attacks on America.
Hollywoods ideological hostility to reality however has not proven to be very profitable.
The Peacemaker, a movie written and co-produced by the Cockburns, whose politics are slightly to the left of Stalin, was the inaugural feature from the failed Spielberg-Geffen-Katzenberg Dreamworks studio and disappointed critics and audiences. The Cockburns would never try their hand at film fiction again unless you count American Casino, their documentary about the financial collapse, which had a financial collapse of its own with an opening weekend of $1,397.
Sum of All Fears, the movie inspired by the Netherlands neo-nationalist threat, was the weakest performer of the Tom Clancy movies when accounting for ticket price inflation and full budget. And it still had a much better opening weekend than Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit.
Failure however wont stop Hollywood from alerting the nation to the terrorist threat lurking in Orthodox Churches or the Dutch neo-nationalists trying to nuke our cities. Hollywoods handpicked leaders were the ones who made the country vulnerable to Islamic terrorism and their industry has gone on covering up for them with movies in which the villains can be anyone and everyone except the real killers.
” Slava Bogu”???
From a GOD less society...
the Siege(1998)turns Muslims into victims. The first muslim attack on the World Trade center was 1993.
FX has a series called The Americans. Russians are the enemy.
Homeland- Showtime Muslims not the enemy we made them turn to violence
The left has a no making the islamo-terrorist look bad policy..
These good anti-capitalists of Hollywood are VERY CAPITALISTIC when it comes to marketing their cr.. err, product, as the Muslim populations of the world are very large and do go to the movies a lot. Also given the mullah-induced ‘indignation’ from the ‘Arab Street’ over some cartoons, the thought of offending by the Hollywood ‘effendi’ is surely prohibited for the ‘purest’ of reasons!
No sarcasm was injured in the writing of these thoughts, logic on the other hand ...
Umm, the Russians were the enemy for about 70 years which includes the period in which “The Americans” is set. Your point illustrates perfectly the premise of the article which is that those who have forgotten or do not know history are doomed to repeat it.
I’m just curious what movies the caliphate will allow when it “peacefully” takes over the country and strikes off the heads of all those Hollywierd filth that make such drivel movies.
This is so true Hollywood wants to be political correct so they have to use stereotypical white villains like the Russians or the Germans
Cowardice, plain and simple.
Mr Lacey and I notice this all the time. Watched a show the other night where the Croatians were the bad guys.
Well. Look at the bright side. When hardcore Islamists take over Hollywood, we’ll finally have movies portraying gays as the bad guys.
Not interested in the new Ryan movie when the trailer shows him hopping in the sack with some slut. Now we find out he is fighting American Christians.
Pray America is Waking
I can understand them not wanting to do the same villains every season but Jack Bauer killed plenty of Muslim terrorists.
——FX has a series called The Americans. Russians are the enemy.——
Well, let’s be fair...that series is set in the 70’s to 80’s where the Russians were the red menace. ..
The way the two Russians are portrayed they may just be the good guys.
The FBI guys aren’t shown so sympathetically.