DUmmie FUnnies 03-28-14 (Pitt: "The used car salesman strikes again")

DUmmie FUnnies ^ | March 28, 2014 | William Rivers Pitt, DUmmies, and PJ-Comix

[PJ-Comix]

So what am I doing up so early? Call it an insomnia attack.

[PJ-Comix]

PING!

[sauropod]

Pitt is an absolute ass.

Thanks for posting this. ‘Pod.

[Incorrigible]

What’s written on DU doesn’t stay on DU.

Early morning top 10

[NELSON111]

I find it incredibly ironic that DUmmies think one loses objectivity when they call a democratic president names...like a POS....but to call Bush that name was considered perfectly proper dialogue.

Top 10.

[Toadman]

Every response in skinners post is projection... amazing.

[AlexW]

Wow, has the Pittster lost one of his red stars. Surly he is not suffering from brief moments of mental clarity.

[BlueDragon]

8ate is W.R.P.'s other middle name.

Used car salesman? Come on...you can do better than that, Mr. W.R.8.P.

[cripplecreek]

Maybe Pitt would have had better luck if he had gone after Obama’s idiotic comment about the Kosovo “referendum”.

[Hardastarboard]

These things clearly take a lot of work to post. Thanks for taking the time.

What I find interesting is that WRP is just being consistent in his views - that waging war on anybody is wrong. When he called the President names in one of his posts, the DUmmies reacted to that rather than what he's saying.

The most shocking part of the whole thing is that any Leftist is capable of consistent thought.

[erod]

Trashing President Obama is against the DU rules - a banning offense.

The cult of DU unreal.

[pogo101]

Goodbye, Mr. Pitts

Robert Donat's Mr. Chips was 83 when he passed away. Will Mr. Pitts make it to 83?

[Arrowhead1952]

But if we are going to prevent people insulting the President, it should be the office, not the person. This means, regardless of occupant, you do not hurl insults, and do not call either man a used car salesman. Of course, you are also asking an editorial writer not to do what is in the fine tradition of editorial writers going back to oh Washington. Do not, I repeat this, do not, read editorials from the civil war, for example. They will make you blush. Trust me, this one is mild. I know, that is a fine distinction many here do not understand. One of multiple reasons I keep real meat out of this place anymore.

This means, regardless of occupant, you do not hurl insults, - - - Was that rule in effect in place when W was the president? I don't remember DU holding back on insults during the Bush years.

[kevkrom]

What I find interesting is that WRP is just being consistent in his views

You do have to give him credit for that, though it's not enough to balance out his obnoxious, sanctimonious, pretentious, self-serving arrogance. But that does place him in the upper-tier at the DUmp; the ones who cannot accept that consistency because it clashed with their emotional attachment to being on the correct "side" are the lower level of pond scum.

[KosmicKitty]

For the first time in years, I went to the DUmp yesterday and saw this thread. I don’t know why I did it, but I googled Nadine. I found a picture of her on her Disqus account.

I will not post it here, it is something that should never be seen! =8-/

[cardinal4]

These posters apparently have no problem with corruption and ineptitude of the administration if they say insulting Obama is a banning offense..

[Army Air Corps]

Are you a glutton for punishment? ;-)

[hsalaw]

These posts are disruptive to healthy discussion.

This is the DUmmies' reaction to the First Amendment.

[Personal Responsibility]

If an invasion and ten-year occupation isn’t annexation, then nothing is.

---

Liberals have such trouble with the definition of words. I suppose a rock solid definition mitigates their ability to twist words into different meanings.

Annexation: The permanent acquisition and incorporation of some territorial entity into another geo-political entity

Do we lay claim to owning Iraq, permanently? Is Iraq a part of the US? A 51st state? A territory? No? Then they weren’t annexed.

[JimRed]

Surly he is not...

Au contraire, surly he IS!