Skip to comments.Carney Spends Nearly 5 Mins Struggling to Explain its Use of Misleading Gender Gap Stats
Posted on 04/08/2014 6:18:02 PM PDT by SavingtheRepublic.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzJUYfwKegA If that isn't bad enough the little twerp took a page from race hustlers, like Sharpton and Jackson, saying republicans are racist for not supporting equal pay! This pay gap farce is just another ploy by the divide, destroy and conquer regime. The pay gap between mean and women is not 77 cents its 93 cents depending on how it's calculated. I will bet there is a good explanation as to why there is a difference in pay in many cases.
No one makes the same amount of money in most cases because some people take a salary while others get paid an hourly wage, we all have different qualifications, skill levels and abilities! Is it right to penalize someone who can't do as much as another because of gender? In many cases YES! Oh boy I'm sure the feminist national socialists will be up in arms now. Fact is there are jobs men can do that women can't or don't want to do and vice versa... that's life kids! But the emperor and his Propaganda Minister want you to think mean, old, white, republican guys are sitting in a back room somewhere deliberately paying women less for doing the same job as men simply because they are women.
For this clown to spend 5 mins trying to weasel around the issue only to pull the race card out smearing republicans just proves what a sad, pathetic, poor excuse of the little man he is!
Hey Jay! If you ALWAYS tell the truth, you don’t have to remember what you said.
It’s not easy being a professional liar.
This was like that scene where Beavis&Butthead were caught stealing money from the register and the Boss questioned it.
Where is Sargaent Schultz when we need him!?
Well he’s in training.
Once he reverts to the a MSM job he’ll increase his salary by roughly 10x.
I’m growing more and more convinced that in the 8 years that the mac daddy sock puppet administration clowns squatting in the White House we will NEVER hear a word of truth from any of them.
It’s 97-98%, depending on how you calculate it.
Sorry. It was 97-98% prior to Obama. It may have changed since then.
Sowell’s has a great refutation of this.
Who would give up a 23% labor cost advantage and hire any men at all?
You’d have to be EXTREMELY bigoted or stupid to hire someone for 23% more IF their contribution were the same.
Soetoro’s organ grinder monkey is pathetic.
That point continues to elude liberals. I brought that up to one of my lib sisters (who made considerably more money at her career than I did at mine). She told me men just like to be sexist even if they lose money. I told her that was an exceptionally stupid argument. Any business that overpaid workers for sexist reasons would find themselves out of business in a short while.
She didn't want to hear any rational arguments, she wanted to believe the lib canard about women being oppressed.
Obama still pays the men on his staff more than he pays the women.
When is he getting around to that?
What about the women business owners?
Why don’t they hire all women for the 23% competitive advantage?
“ah... you’re oppressed... isn’t that cyooooot!”
That poor boy’s gonna have a brainstorm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.