Skip to comments.Was Stopping Nevada’s Fracking Rush Behind the Bundy Showdown?
Posted on 04/14/2014 8:36:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The story of rancher Cliven Bundy has captured an abundance of media attention and attracted supporters from across the West, who relate to the struggle against the federal management of lands. Bundys sister, Susan, was asked: Whos behind the uproar? She blamed the Sierra Club, then Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), and then President Obama. She concluded her comments with: Its all about controla sentiment that is frequently expressed regarding actions taken in response to some endangered-species claim.
An Associated Press report describes Bundys battle this way: The current showdown pits rancher Cliven Bundys claims of ancestral rights to graze his cows on open range against federal claims that the cattle are trespassing on arid and fragile habitat of the endangered desert tortoise.
Bundys story has been percolating for decadesleaving people to question why now. The pundits are, perhaps, missing the real motive. To discover it, you have to dig deep under the surface of the story, below the surface of the earth. I posit: it is all about oil and gas.
On April 10, the Natural News Network posted this: BLM fracking racket exposed! Armed siege and cattle theft from Bundy ranch really about fracking leases. It states: a Natural News investigation has found that BLM is actually in the business of raking in millions of dollars by leasing Nevada lands to energy companies that engage in fracking operations.
This set off alarms in my head; it didnt add up. I know that oil-and-gas development and ranching can happily coexist. Caren Cowan, executive director of the New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, told me: The ranching and oil-and-gas communities are the backbone of America. They are the folks who allow the rest of the nation to pursue their hearts desire secure in the knowledge that they will have food and energy available in abundant supply. These natural resource users have worked arm-in-arm for nearly a century on the same land. They are constantly developing and employing technologies for ever better outcomes.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) wouldnt be enduring the humiliating press it has received, as a result of kicking Bundy off of land his family has ranched for generations and taking away his prior usage rights, just to open up the land for oil-and-gasthe two can both be there.
The Natural News investigation includes a map from the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology that shows significant exploratory drilling being conducted in precisely the same area where the Bundy family has been running cattle since the 1870s. It continues: Whats also clear is that oil has been found in nearby areas.
Nevada is not a top-of-mind state when one thinks about oil and gas. Alan Coyner, administrator for the Nevada Division of Minerals, describes his state: We are not a major oil-producing state. Were not the Saudi Arabia of the U.S. like we are for gold and geothermal production. The Las Vegas Review Journal reports: When it comes to oil, Nevada is largely undiscovered country . fewer than 1,000 wells have been drilled in the state, and only about 70 are now in production, churning out modest amounts of low-grade petroleum generally used for tar or asphalt. Since an all-time high of 4 million barrels in 1990, oil production in Nevada has plummeted to fewer than 400,000 barrels a year. More oil is pumped from the ground in one day in North Dakotawhere the fracking boom has added more than 2,000 new wells in recent yearsthan Nevada produced in 2012.
But, Nevada could soon join the ranks of the states that are experiencing an economic boom and job creation due to oil-and-gas development. And, that has got to have the environmental groups, which are hell-bent on stopping it, in panic mode. Until now, their efforts in Nevada have been focused on blocking big solar development.
A year ago, the BLM held an oil-and-gas lease sale in Reno. At the sale, 29 federal land leases, totaling about 56 square miles, were auctioned off, bringing in $1.27 million. One of the winning bidders is Houston-based Noble Energy, which plans to drill as many as 20 exploratory wells and could start drilling by the end of the year. Commenting on its acreage, Susan Cunningham, Noble senior vice president, said: Were thrilled with the possibilities of this under-explored petroleum system.
The parcels made available in April 2013 will be developed using hydraulic fracturing, about which Coyner quipped: If the Silver States first big shale play pays off, it could touch off a fracking rush in Nevada. Despite the fact that fracking has been done safely and successfully for more than 65 years in America, the Center for Biological Diversitys (CBD) Nevada-based senior scientist, Ron Mrowka, told the Las Vegas Review Journal: Fracking is not a good thing. We dont feel there is a safe way to do it.
The BLM made the leases available after someone, or some company, nominated the parcels, and the process to get them ready for auction can easily take a year or longer. One year before the April 2013, sale, CBD filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue the BLM for its failure to protect the desert tortoise in the Gold Butte areawhere Bundy cattle have grazed for more than a century.
Because agencies like the BLM are often staffed by environmental sympathizers, it is possible that CBD was alerted to the pending potential oil-and-gas boom when the April 2013 parcels were nominatedtriggering the notice of intent to sue in an attempt to lock up as much land as possible before the fracking rush could begin.
A March 25, 2014 CBD press releasewhich reportedly served as the impetus for the current showdownstates: Tortoises suffer while BLM allows trespass cattle to eat for free in Nevada desert. It points out that the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan purchased and then retired grazing leases to protect the endangered tortoise.
Once Bundys cattle are kicked off the land to protect the tortoise, the precedent will be set to use the tortoise to block any oil-and-gas development in the areaafter all environmentalists hate cattle only slightly less than they hate oil and gas. Admittedly, the April 13 leases are not in the same area as Bundys cattle, however, Gold Butte does have some oil-and-gas exploration that CBDs actions could nip in the bud. Intellihub reports: The BLM claims that they are seizing land to preserve it, for environmental protection. However, it is obvious that environmental protection is not their goal if they are selling large areas of land to fracking companies. Although the land that was sold last year is 300 and some miles away from the Bundy ranch, the aggressive tactics that have been used by federal agents in this situation are raising the suspicion that this is another BLM land grab that is destined for a private auction.
The Natural News Network also sees that the tortoise is being used as a scapegoat: Anyone who thinks this siege is about reptiles is kidding themselves. It adds: Endangered tortoises is merely the government cover story for confiscating land to turn it over to fracking companies for millions of dollars in energy leases. The Network sees that it isnt really about the critters; after all, hundreds of desert tortoises are being euthanized in Nevada.
Though the Intellihub and Natural News Network point to the current showdown as being about allowing oil-and-gas development, I believe that removing the cattle is really a Trojan horse. The tortoise protection will be used to block any more leasing.
On April 5, 2014, CBD sent out a triumphant press release announcing that the long-awaited roundup of cattle had begun.
What I am presenting is only a theory; I am just connecting some dots. But over-and-over, an endangered or threated species or habitat is used to block all kinds of economic development. A few weeks ago, I wrote about the lesser prairie chicken and the huge effort ($26 million) a variety of industries cooperatively engaged in to keep its habitat from being listed as threatened. The effort failed and the chickens habitat was listed. In my column on the topic, I predicted that these listings were likely to trigger another sage brush rebellion that will challenge federal land ownership. The Bundy showdown has brought the controversy front and center.
For now, southern Nevadas last rancher has won the week-long standoff that has been likened to Tiananmen Square. Reports state that the BLM said it did so because it feared for the safety of employees and members of the public, not because it has changed its position.
While this chapter may be closing, it may have opened the next chapter in the sage brush rebellion. The Bundy standoff has pointed out the overreach of federal agencies and the use of threatened or endangered species to block economic activity.
Yes I believe fracking prohibition was a factor behind Obama’s decision to unleash the BLM dogs.
Last week I heard directly a top manager of one of the USA’s biggest pipeline operators in the Bakken say that environmentalists told Obama that if he allowed Keystone to go forward that they would ‘crucify’ him. What they meant by that is anybody’s guess but one can speculate that it means to drop his protection from investigations, lawsuits, impeachment etc.
The environmentalists in California are militant about fracking there. It’s not a stretch for them to look at having BLM close off huge sections of lands for a desert tortoise or some contrived pretext especially when such lands are available for oil and gas leases involving fracking.
So yes it is not only plausible but actually probable.
I don’t buy the fracking angle on this story. I’ve seen fracking in PA and I am sure the methods are not much different anywhere else. First, the impact comes from drilling and that does not take up more than an acre of of land (less roads to get to the pad). Second, fracking is an extraction technique that does not require additional space than the existing well head. What is one acre in a section of land? Particularly when hundreds of sections of land are involved?
A compromise has been reached. The cattle agree to stop stepping on the turtles if the turtles stop whining about being endangered.
Successful Drilling has been done in the ‘hood.
Fracking is Schlumberger’s baby, a French origin but mostly International Expat company that has the patents on it. They are very slick at getting in the business quietly. Opposing fracking would probably get the French angry at lodge a complaint at the WTO. Some games are going on.
I am not merely speculating.
I don’t know if the above is true but the above is not the only report of fracking related reasons for the Bundy fiasco.
Negligible possibility of oil and gas. It’s all about the solar farm Benjamins.
OK they lost me the moment I read Fracking Lease, no such critter exists.
Fracking requires water, lots of water. While much can be recycled, you still have to have enough to do the job. People in the West don’t fight over land, they fight over water.
That said, the BLM is doing the opposite of what is suggested here. They are closing millions of acres to oil and gas development, abusing their authority to proclaim “wilderness areas”. Their general behavior has been to prohibit human activity of any kind, but especially economic activity. The only exception has been green energy scams.
Here's one that shows why the Sheriff of Clark County is duty bound to keep the BLM and all Federal agents from arresting Cliven Bundy.
What I smell is a 'blame the oil patch' media bomb, aimed at getting credibility through repetition. (A lot like ABCNNBCBS does).
The terminology, however is all wrong.
Now, whether this is aimed at deflecting attention from solar interests and possible political connections, or just shifting blame to a predominantly conservative industry, I don't know, but the same poster has been shilling this stuff from the git go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.