Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cities Increase Fees, Spend More While Complaining About State Shared Revenue
Capitol Confidential ^ | 4/10/2014 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 04/15/2014 5:46:23 AM PDT by MichCapCon

Fire inspection fees in Ann Arbor have increased 590 percent since 2003, and inspections are happening more often now.

The reason, said Ann Arbor Fire Marshal Reka Farrackand, is in "the interest of public safety as well as to comply with city ordinance."

Commercial property inspections cost business owners $690 in 2013, up from $100 in 2003.

The increase in cost made news when one business property owner refused to let the city inspect his buildings, according to MLive.

Ann Arbor, like many cities in Michigan, has seen its state shared revenue decrease, and while that has been widely reported, what has been under-reported is how cities have done overall financially.

The Michigan Municipal League released an analysis of how much optional municipal revenue sharing has been diverted to other parts of the state budget. From 2003 to 2013, Ann Arbor got $36 million less in state shared revenue than it thought it would get. The Michigan Municipal League has referred to situations like that as a "heist' and a "raid."

Nonetheless, Ann Arbor still found ways to increase its overall spending.

For example, charges for services in Ann Arbor have increased $20.2 million in the past 10 years, from $64.4 million in 2003 to $84.6 million in 2013. That's due in part to the increase in some fees.

Ann Arbor has seen increases in other major sources of revenue, too. Property taxes jumped from $61.3 million in 2003 to $66.7 million in 2013. Total revenue for the city increased from $166 million to $190.4 million from 2003 to 2013.

Other cities have also seen their total revenue increase despite the reduction of state shared revenue.

For example, the city of Grand Rapids did not get $72.9 million from optional state shared revenue, according to the MML analysis. However, its total revenue still increased from $118.6 million in 2003 to $126.1 million in 2013.

Flint did not get $54.9 million, but still saw total revenue increase to about $107.5 million in 2013 from $102.2 million in 2003.

Ann Arbor City Councilman Stephen Kunselman said some of the increases in funding for the Washtenaw County city are restricted funds, such as the water utility revenue.

"So it appears the city's general fund increased slightly in 10 years, but not enough to maintain our basic services like public safety and crumbling roads," Kunselman said in an email. "It's time the governor and state Legislature [to] either honor the commitment of their law or change it to reflect their bias against cities."

The state collects money from the sales tax and then redistributes some of it to local municipalities. A certain amount of money, based on population, is mandated by the state constitution. The rest is done by statute. In the past decade, the amount the state redistributes to municipalities has gone down, though the most recent budget proposals reverse this trend.

"Municipal governments have been protected from the recession and yet complain about money supposedly owed by the state," said James Hohman, assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. "If the state really was obliged to pay up, these officials would be complaining to the courts, not to the state newspapers."

Matt Bach, director of media relations for the Michigan Municipal League, didn't respond to a request for comment.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: funding

1 posted on 04/15/2014 5:46:23 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Most leftist run entities just have no clue about what is happening when they raise taxes and revenues decline.
They just raise them some more.


2 posted on 04/15/2014 5:47:54 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Until the public attends city council meetings and asks about expenditures on a weekly basis....it will continue.

First question for Ann Arbor....what is the cost of running the inspection shop for the fire department? What’s the pay scale? What benefit package is given?

If the chief inspector is paid more than $80,000 a year....it might be curious to ask if he’s beyond their capability to pay, then give him twelve months to find another job or face a pay loss.


3 posted on 04/15/2014 5:50:37 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“Fire inspection fees in Ann Arbor have increased 590 percent since 2003, and inspections are happening more often now.”....”made news when one business property owner refused to let the city inspect his buildings”

Cue up an image from the Movie Billy Bathgate (no not Nicole Kidman skinny dipping), the one where Dutch Shultz, played by Dustin Hoffman, beats to death some inspector looking for a bribe at his night club.


4 posted on 04/15/2014 5:53:02 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Increasing fees, fines and penalties is the new hidden way to increase taxes.


5 posted on 04/15/2014 6:12:59 AM PDT by Monmouth78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Ann Arbor is as bad as they get. Given the choice of vaporizing Ann Arbor or Detroit, Ann Arbor is the one that would get it. Detroit may be a leech but Ann Arbor is an arrogant, self righteous liberal leech.

To make matters worse, many cities want to emulate Ann Arbor and be “world class” cities which means spending money.


6 posted on 04/15/2014 6:21:28 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Local lawmakers have for too many years predicated all of their actions and their spending on one assumption:

That big bags of money from either Washington or the state capital will fall out of the sky and land on the steps of City Hall.

Stark reality is now setting in. That is NOT going to happen.


7 posted on 04/15/2014 6:47:15 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson