Posted on 04/18/2014 5:55:02 AM PDT by Timber Rattler
National Review Online took another gratuitous shot at me Thursday in an article defending Ayaan Hirsi Ali, saying: “Hirsi Ali is no Pamela Geller. On the contrary, for her whole life, Hirsi Ali has used anger as a catalyst to great good.” Is it necessary to smear me in order to defend Hirsi Ali? And this is not the first time that NRO has allowed insults and defamation against me and other freedom fighters to run unedited. I hardly know why. But I do know that NRO has no guts, no spine, and no conviction.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Pamela is an ace in a dogfight, and it would be great to see hundreds of her kind in the skies.
Ann Coulter arrived at this conclusion as well. That is why she referred to the editors at NR as "girlie-men".
I'd bet Mark Steyn shares the estimation of Geller and Coulter.
Ouch! That is going to leave a scar.
Having never cared for Buckley or his libertarian agenda, I can’t say I care much for the NRO.
Then nor now.
Not so sure Buckley would be defending Pamela Geller in anything other than in her fight against Islam. He wasn’t crazy about Ayn Rand’s positions outside economics & politics either.
WOW, Pam Geller is my hero!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.