Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antonov 225:World's Largest Aircraft With Six Engines
YouTube ^ | June 26, 2013 | Rory Lushman

Posted on 04/20/2014 9:43:55 PM PDT by lbryce

Original Title:Antonov 225 Mriya Departs Manchester Airport, 26th June 2013 Antonov 225 (UR-82060) finally leaves Manchester Airport after being delayed 24 hours. The huge aircraft is seen departing runway 23L on Wednesday 26th June 2013. The aircraft certainly pulled the crowds in. Just before the Antonov crosses onto runway two, Thomson 787 Dreamliner, G-TUIC lands on 23R.

The Antonov 225 is currently the largest aircraft in the world.


(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antonov225; worldslargestplane
This is the mother of all planes. A super massive flying whale with 6 engines to send it soaring aloft. In the days when the Soviets copied our shuttle and created the Buran (Blizzard in Russian)The Antov 225 is what it flew back on.


1 posted on 04/20/2014 9:43:55 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I think I saw one of those land at Moffatt some years back. It was a freaking monster.


2 posted on 04/20/2014 9:52:15 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Holy crap!

That thing must burn 20,000 bucks worth of kerosene an hour....


3 posted on 04/20/2014 9:56:39 PM PDT by Bobalu (Four Cokes And A Fried Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This one is in Ukrainian livery, they possess some too

I saw it land at Long Beach once...


4 posted on 04/20/2014 9:57:20 PM PDT by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

They had to sit there and rev the turbines while holding the wheel brakes for several minutes, to the point that the fuselage was visibly bobbing up and down and the wings were shaking, just to get that barge off the ground before the runway ran out. It’s impressive in a way, but it’s a caricature in a way, too. Overkill for overkill’s sake, especially the rear landing gear.


5 posted on 04/20/2014 9:59:19 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I have seen one of those parked at ATL when they came over for airshows in the mid 90s.It is a monster.


6 posted on 04/20/2014 9:59:33 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Would feel much better flying in a Boeing......


7 posted on 04/20/2014 10:03:56 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican; HANG THE EXPENSE
Only one AN-225 was made, it was meant to carry Soviet's Buran as piggyback.

http://ram-home.com/ram-old/an-225buran-vak200102.jpg

8 posted on 04/20/2014 10:11:11 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

dunno, the 777s disappear at random.


9 posted on 04/20/2014 10:12:44 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

~Overkill for overkill’s sake, especially the rear landing gear.~

In fact these overkill landing gear makes perfect sense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6bKCsJd2K0
Overshooting runway is not a big problem.


10 posted on 04/20/2014 10:14:22 PM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I missed why this is being posted today,if the flight occured in June ‘13. Why?


11 posted on 04/20/2014 10:21:18 PM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Eli Lilly chartered one back in the early 2000’s to move some equipment to San Juan. I got an up close and personal on it.

Great looking airplane, but a piece of crap up close. Threadbare tires, busted rivets, pilot seats mounted on wooden blocks, fans screwed into the cockpit dash, due to inop air conditioning, etc.

The American Trans Air mechs worked on it for free, just to have it in their logbooks. Was on the ground, broke, at IND for almost 3 weeks.


12 posted on 04/20/2014 10:23:11 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Not early 2000’s, more like late 90’s, now that I think about it.


13 posted on 04/20/2014 10:24:30 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

That’s an effing big plane.


14 posted on 04/20/2014 10:25:42 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I was a passenger on a C5A Galaxy back when it was the largest cargo plane in the world. Looks like this thing could carry a few C5As in it’s cargo bay.


15 posted on 04/20/2014 10:38:12 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I saw one in Las Vegas once. In reality, there were very few built. They do plan to make more.

One of the reasons for the very heavy duty landing gear is the USSR (and possibly Russian) requirement for military aircraft to be able to operate on semi-improved runways. Our planes would probably disintegrate while attempting to take off/land on many of their runways. Of course, there is a severe weight/performance penalty for this.


16 posted on 04/20/2014 10:58:31 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Wonder why some Euro country hasn't tried to re-engine that beast?

Imagine what it could haul with efficient, low carbon engines.

17 posted on 04/20/2014 11:02:20 PM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Why then Antonov AN-225 wasn’t called to haul Saddam Hussein’s 550 metric tons yellowcakes directly to Canada? It took 37 C-17 top-secret flights from Baghdad to Diego Garcia then shipped on SS Gopher State under heavy security to Canada. Under heavy security? Oh it was low-grade yellowcake, yeah right. How much yellowcake to make a U-235 anyway?


18 posted on 04/20/2014 11:02:44 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

But they’re really, really, really close to finding it.

This time. Or something.


19 posted on 04/20/2014 11:07:57 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

;)


20 posted on 04/20/2014 11:10:04 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
I got to fly cross country on the conventional Antonov back in the early 90s.

At the time, the aircraft was well maintained and in pretty good shape but the engineering was crude and the build quality rough compared to , say, a C-5 Galaxy.

The Russian pilots were a trip . They were some of the first to get out unsupervised as “civilians” world wide and lets just say that they did not exactly conform to the FAA ideal for rules following commercial pilots. In fact, they were pretty dismissive of much of any kind of rules at all , for that matter.

Russian aviation is a very different thing from what we are used to here in the states.

21 posted on 04/20/2014 11:16:21 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Wow,only one? That must have cost them plenty.


22 posted on 04/20/2014 11:17:55 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
But they’re really, really, really close to finding it. This time. Or something.

Really? Did Hitch called the Malaysian government where he commandeered the airplane?

23 posted on 04/20/2014 11:20:16 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Yes only one. In America if only one made that’s prototype.


24 posted on 04/20/2014 11:22:43 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It amazes me how they get those wings to flapping.....


25 posted on 04/20/2014 11:25:32 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Some are probably confusing it with the AN-124 of which there were several.


26 posted on 04/20/2014 11:29:16 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Four Rolls-Royce Trents or GENx engines out-thrust the AN-225’s six Progress D18-T engines by more than 100,000 pounds.


27 posted on 04/20/2014 11:31:05 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Needs more girth, more engines.


28 posted on 04/20/2014 11:41:40 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Stratolaunch will be bigger...in 2016?
29 posted on 04/20/2014 11:42:21 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: married21
You missed why this is being posted today, if the flight occurred on June '13?

Well, the lavatories weren't properly constructed when originally built and the storage overflow were built in rectangular shape while the the auxiliary fuel tanks were constructed in pyramidal rows of six, each auxiliary pyramid placed at 90 degree angle formation to each other for maximum dynamic flow. But the rectangular shaped lavatory storage overflow ended up at an obtuse angle configuration that corroded the overflow capacitors allowing the lavatory overflow to leak into the auxiliary fuel tanks, which was the same conditions that resulted in the blowout of the Kursk double-hulled submarine. I'm sure you realize the fuel toxicity generated put the aircraft in grave danger. Below are now declassified documents that explain the entire procedure.

,

The lavatory compartments were rebuilt and completed today as of April 20, 2014 which the Russian Air Force chose to commemorate by flying the plane out 50 nautical miles and using the new upgraded lavatories in celebration.

30 posted on 04/21/2014 12:12:29 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Sort of. The US also had a history of putting one off or low number prototypes/development large cargo aircraft into operational service. Classic example was the single C-99, transport version of the B-36. Also the Lockheed Constitution, Martin Mars, Convair Tradewind.

Not to mention the earlier XB-15 and B-19 bombers, although the latter was also used as a testing platform in addition to occasional cargo hauling duties.

Technically the Space Shuttles never achieved “operational” status, and were pretty much prototypes, something NASA acknowledged after Columbia was lost.


31 posted on 04/21/2014 12:52:17 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
dunno, the 777s disappear at random.

Yeah. Just ask US Airways!

Anyone know if they've retrieved the black boxes?

32 posted on 04/21/2014 12:52:37 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Does anyone know what its useful payload is?


33 posted on 04/21/2014 3:03:14 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

A bit over half a million pounds.


34 posted on 04/21/2014 3:32:09 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wetphoenix

Thanks that is some serious tonnage


35 posted on 04/21/2014 3:46:02 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Not the most refined design, basically a stretched An-124 military transport, with larger wing, redesigned tail and a couple extra engines.
Still a single aircraft which is larger than Spruce Goose.


36 posted on 04/21/2014 3:56:06 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

And in other breaking news...

George H. W. Bush is elected over Michael Dukakis, becoming the first sitting Vice President of the United States in 152 years to be elected as President of the United States.**

Probably more timely would be the news about the EADS E-Fan Maiden Flight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hP2FAEaEfG0

E-Fan: electric aircraft in progress

Two years after the first electric aerobatic plane and the smallest manned aircraft in the world with four electric engines, the all-electric Cri-Cri, the teams at EADS IW and Royan-based ACS (Charente Maritime, France) have gone a step further with E-Fan, a fully electric general aviation training aircraft.

“The introduction of the E-Fan electric aircraft represents another strategic step forward in EADS’ aviation research. We are committed to exploring leading-edge technologies that will yield future benefits for our civil and defense products,” said Jean Botti, Chief Technical Officer (CTO), at EADS.

The two-seat E-Fan has undergone a very intensive development phase of only eight months. It features two electrical engines driving shrouded propellers. Total static engine thrust is about 1,5 kN, with the energy being provided by two battery packs located in the wings. The length of the aircraft is 6.7 meters with a wingspan of 9.5 meters. It is the first electric aircraft featuring ducted fans to reduce noise and increase safety. Another innovation is the main landing gear. It allows electrical taxiing on the ground without the main engines and in addition provides acceleration during take-off up to a speed of 60 km/h. To guarantee a simple handling of the electrically powered engines and systems, the E-Fan is equipped with an E-FADEC energy management system.

“We believe that the E-Fan demonstrator is an ideal platform that could be eventually matured, certified to and marketed as an aircraft for pilot training,” explained Botti. EADS IW is developing the electrical and propulsion system together with partners like ACS, which is building the all-composite structure, the mechanical systems and conducted the aerodynamic studies. The French innovation institutes CRITT Matériaux Poitou-Charentes (CRITT MPC) and ISAE-ENSMA, as well as the company C3 Technologies have been responsible for the construction and production of the wings. The engagement of these companies is also an investment in French infrastructure, jobs and know-how. Furthermore, electrical engineering experts from Astrium and Eurocopter helped out with their expertise in testing the battery packs while the livery was designed by Airbus. The E-Fan project is co-funded by the Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile (DGAC, the French civil aviation authority), the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), the French Government (Fonds FRED), the Région Aquitaine and the Département Charente-Maritime of France.

http://insideevs.com/eads-e-fan-maiden-flight-video/

** GHW Bush was elected in November 1988. The Anatov 225 first flew in December 1988.


37 posted on 04/21/2014 5:39:36 AM PDT by AboveTheClouds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Very interesting. Taking a ceremonial first dump, to celebrate? I’m guessing there was no official photographer present to capture the moment.


38 posted on 04/21/2014 7:07:33 AM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

39 posted on 04/21/2014 7:55:28 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Bookmark


40 posted on 04/21/2014 8:04:59 AM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: publius911
You really must see this image of the Antonov 225 transporting the Soviet Shuttle. It is absolutely awesome. I originally posted the image but it was much too overwhelming, broadband hogging and it was removed from the thread. But you really must see it.

http://ww.showziji.com/antonov-hd-wallpaper/aircraft-soviet-ussr-antonov-an225-buran-shuttle-ukrainian-hd-wallpaper/

41 posted on 04/21/2014 9:08:04 AM PDT by lbryce (Barack Hussein Obama:The Worst is Yet to Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Just noticed that it was restored on top. Sorry to trouble you.


42 posted on 04/21/2014 9:09:18 AM PDT by lbryce (Barack Hussein Obama:The Worst is Yet to Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

That is some awesome graphic. Very impressive.


43 posted on 04/21/2014 9:12:27 AM PDT by lbryce (Barack Hussein Obama:The Worst is Yet to Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Impressive—Russians like big showy airplanes—always have, always will.


44 posted on 04/21/2014 10:08:39 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson