Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antonov 225:World's Largest Aircraft With Six Engines
YouTube ^ | June 26, 2013 | Rory Lushman

Posted on 04/20/2014 9:43:55 PM PDT by lbryce

Original Title:Antonov 225 Mriya Departs Manchester Airport, 26th June 2013 Antonov 225 (UR-82060) finally leaves Manchester Airport after being delayed 24 hours. The huge aircraft is seen departing runway 23L on Wednesday 26th June 2013. The aircraft certainly pulled the crowds in. Just before the Antonov crosses onto runway two, Thomson 787 Dreamliner, G-TUIC lands on 23R.

The Antonov 225 is currently the largest aircraft in the world.


(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antonov225; worldslargestplane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: tcrlaf
I got to fly cross country on the conventional Antonov back in the early 90s.

At the time, the aircraft was well maintained and in pretty good shape but the engineering was crude and the build quality rough compared to , say, a C-5 Galaxy.

The Russian pilots were a trip . They were some of the first to get out unsupervised as “civilians” world wide and lets just say that they did not exactly conform to the FAA ideal for rules following commercial pilots. In fact, they were pretty dismissive of much of any kind of rules at all , for that matter.

Russian aviation is a very different thing from what we are used to here in the states.

21 posted on 04/20/2014 11:16:21 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Wow,only one? That must have cost them plenty.


22 posted on 04/20/2014 11:17:55 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
But they’re really, really, really close to finding it. This time. Or something.

Really? Did Hitch called the Malaysian government where he commandeered the airplane?

23 posted on 04/20/2014 11:20:16 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Yes only one. In America if only one made that’s prototype.


24 posted on 04/20/2014 11:22:43 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It amazes me how they get those wings to flapping.....


25 posted on 04/20/2014 11:25:32 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: lbryce

Four Rolls-Royce Trents or GENx engines out-thrust the AN-225’s six Progress D18-T engines by more than 100,000 pounds.


27 posted on 04/20/2014 11:31:05 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Needs more girth, more engines.


28 posted on 04/20/2014 11:41:40 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Stratolaunch will be bigger...in 2016?
29 posted on 04/20/2014 11:42:21 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: married21
You missed why this is being posted today, if the flight occurred on June '13?

Well, the lavatories weren't properly constructed when originally built and the storage overflow were built in rectangular shape while the the auxiliary fuel tanks were constructed in pyramidal rows of six, each auxiliary pyramid placed at 90 degree angle formation to each other for maximum dynamic flow. But the rectangular shaped lavatory storage overflow ended up at an obtuse angle configuration that corroded the overflow capacitors allowing the lavatory overflow to leak into the auxiliary fuel tanks, which was the same conditions that resulted in the blowout of the Kursk double-hulled submarine. I'm sure you realize the fuel toxicity generated put the aircraft in grave danger. Below are now declassified documents that explain the entire procedure.

,

The lavatory compartments were rebuilt and completed today as of April 20, 2014 which the Russian Air Force chose to commemorate by flying the plane out 50 nautical miles and using the new upgraded lavatories in celebration.

30 posted on 04/21/2014 12:12:29 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Sort of. The US also had a history of putting one off or low number prototypes/development large cargo aircraft into operational service. Classic example was the single C-99, transport version of the B-36. Also the Lockheed Constitution, Martin Mars, Convair Tradewind.

Not to mention the earlier XB-15 and B-19 bombers, although the latter was also used as a testing platform in addition to occasional cargo hauling duties.

Technically the Space Shuttles never achieved “operational” status, and were pretty much prototypes, something NASA acknowledged after Columbia was lost.


31 posted on 04/21/2014 12:52:17 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
dunno, the 777s disappear at random.

Yeah. Just ask US Airways!

Anyone know if they've retrieved the black boxes?

32 posted on 04/21/2014 12:52:37 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Does anyone know what its useful payload is?


33 posted on 04/21/2014 3:03:14 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

A bit over half a million pounds.


34 posted on 04/21/2014 3:32:09 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wetphoenix

Thanks that is some serious tonnage


35 posted on 04/21/2014 3:46:02 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Not the most refined design, basically a stretched An-124 military transport, with larger wing, redesigned tail and a couple extra engines.
Still a single aircraft which is larger than Spruce Goose.


36 posted on 04/21/2014 3:56:06 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

And in other breaking news...

George H. W. Bush is elected over Michael Dukakis, becoming the first sitting Vice President of the United States in 152 years to be elected as President of the United States.**

Probably more timely would be the news about the EADS E-Fan Maiden Flight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hP2FAEaEfG0

E-Fan: electric aircraft in progress

Two years after the first electric aerobatic plane and the smallest manned aircraft in the world with four electric engines, the all-electric Cri-Cri, the teams at EADS IW and Royan-based ACS (Charente Maritime, France) have gone a step further with E-Fan, a fully electric general aviation training aircraft.

“The introduction of the E-Fan electric aircraft represents another strategic step forward in EADS’ aviation research. We are committed to exploring leading-edge technologies that will yield future benefits for our civil and defense products,” said Jean Botti, Chief Technical Officer (CTO), at EADS.

The two-seat E-Fan has undergone a very intensive development phase of only eight months. It features two electrical engines driving shrouded propellers. Total static engine thrust is about 1,5 kN, with the energy being provided by two battery packs located in the wings. The length of the aircraft is 6.7 meters with a wingspan of 9.5 meters. It is the first electric aircraft featuring ducted fans to reduce noise and increase safety. Another innovation is the main landing gear. It allows electrical taxiing on the ground without the main engines and in addition provides acceleration during take-off up to a speed of 60 km/h. To guarantee a simple handling of the electrically powered engines and systems, the E-Fan is equipped with an E-FADEC energy management system.

“We believe that the E-Fan demonstrator is an ideal platform that could be eventually matured, certified to and marketed as an aircraft for pilot training,” explained Botti. EADS IW is developing the electrical and propulsion system together with partners like ACS, which is building the all-composite structure, the mechanical systems and conducted the aerodynamic studies. The French innovation institutes CRITT Matériaux Poitou-Charentes (CRITT MPC) and ISAE-ENSMA, as well as the company C3 Technologies have been responsible for the construction and production of the wings. The engagement of these companies is also an investment in French infrastructure, jobs and know-how. Furthermore, electrical engineering experts from Astrium and Eurocopter helped out with their expertise in testing the battery packs while the livery was designed by Airbus. The E-Fan project is co-funded by the Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile (DGAC, the French civil aviation authority), the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), the French Government (Fonds FRED), the Région Aquitaine and the Département Charente-Maritime of France.

http://insideevs.com/eads-e-fan-maiden-flight-video/

** GHW Bush was elected in November 1988. The Anatov 225 first flew in December 1988.


37 posted on 04/21/2014 5:39:36 AM PDT by AboveTheClouds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Very interesting. Taking a ceremonial first dump, to celebrate? I’m guessing there was no official photographer present to capture the moment.


38 posted on 04/21/2014 7:07:33 AM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

39 posted on 04/21/2014 7:55:28 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Bookmark


40 posted on 04/21/2014 8:04:59 AM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson