Total fiction. Even a left-wing academic with a motivation to boost the numbers could only come up with less than half of that:
The total number of African deaths directly attributable to the Middle Passage voyage is estimated at up to two million; a broader look at African deaths directly attributable to the institution of slavery from 1500 to 1900 suggests up to four million African deaths [*]
That is "up to" 4 millions over 400 years on 4 continents.
And it was a relative drop in the bucket compared to the number of Africans killed in tribal warfare by the coming of the "religion of peace" either forcing them to convert, making them slaves and, sometimes, believe it or not, both.
Before the "religion of peace" arrived, Timbuktu was a center of university learning. Now it is synonymous with an out of the way backwater.
Total fiction. Even a left-wing academic with a motivation to boost the numbers could only come up with . . . "up to" 4 millions over 400 years on 4 continents.You want to tell me about the systematic extermination of six million? I see that and raise you to ten million.
. . . and there have never been as many Jews in the world as there have been blacks, either - the six million figure was most of the Jews in all of Europe. So that is strictly an apples-to-oranges comparison.
The real objection to this guys point is that although he shames the Jew for playing the victim card, he isnt ashamed of playing it himself, whereas he understands quite well that the Jew understands the self-destructive tendency inherent in it.
Fundamentally, his problem with the Jew is precisely that the Jew's family history indicates that victimhood can be transcended - but he prefers to profit from victimhood rather than to transcend it.