Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fine Print Everyone is Missing on the New USDA Ballistic Vests Order....
Dutchman6 ^ | 5/17/14 | Sipsey Street Irregulars

Posted on 05/17/2014 11:56:36 PM PDT by Nachum

A faithful reader forwards this link under the header, "The Fine Print Everyone is Missing on the new USDA Ballistic Vests Order...." with this quote from the order and a comment:

Please note:

"Synopsis:

Added: May 07, 2014 2:24 pm

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General, located in Washington, DC and Regional Offices, pursuant to the authority of FAR Part 13, has a requirement for the commerical acquisition of ballist vests, compliant with NIJ 0101.06 for Level IIIA Ballistic Resistance of body armor. Body armor is gender specific, lightweight, trauma plate/pad (hard or soft), concealable carrier, tactical vest, undergarment (white), identification patches, accessories (6 pouches), body armor carry bag, and professional measurements."

My 2 cents:

The 6 pouch and tactical vest requirement description on this USDA quote confirm that these are ASSAULT vests. They're what troops wear in an attack evolution. This is a full military-styled kit, not designed for typical defensive security work.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government
KEYWORDS: ballistic; cnsf; cw2; order; policestate; tyranny; usda; vests
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Nachum

Well, of Course, the US Department of Agriculture SWAT teams will need protective body armor. DUH!


21 posted on 05/18/2014 8:17:18 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Its my freedom. YES. I will be keeping it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macglencoe

Yep. Kneecapping has the additional benefit of taking not one but at least 2 folks out of the arena as somebody has to carry them out of the fray.


22 posted on 05/18/2014 8:43:48 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

I read that they also ordered 30-round magazines.


23 posted on 05/18/2014 9:40:08 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A Threat Level IIA vest is not proof against rifle rounds — even with a trauma plate. Or, when in doubt, do head shots and ignore their vests. Sorry USDA thugs, you’re not bulletproof.


24 posted on 05/18/2014 10:50:33 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Up Yours Marxists

If you’re going to use a flamethrower, why should whether the “legality” matter or not? A crispy critter USDA thug is still a crispy critter whether it’s in one of the “legal” 40 states or not.


25 posted on 05/18/2014 10:54:27 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

bkmk


26 posted on 05/18/2014 1:15:47 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

.30-06 or .308, 7.62x54R, lost my .300 win mag(Browning Safari) in tragic fire. Just curious. Any info appreciated. All info strictly confidential except for the prying eyes of the perverted peeping toms at the NSA.


27 posted on 05/18/2014 1:46:46 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

‘Will the vests fit on cows?’

Better question, will they fit on dogs?


28 posted on 05/18/2014 1:49:05 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

You heard it at FR first:

U.S. Department of Agriculture: Solicitation for submachine guns, .40 Cal. S&W, - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3155648/posts


29 posted on 05/18/2014 5:19:03 PM PDT by Perseverando (Obamanation: It's ALL about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson