Thanks!
How does leaving out something that you think is worth while the same thing as distortion????
Levin is good on history and the constitution. You din’t work for Reagan. Don’t know if you have a law degree. You don’t have a radio show. You haven’t taken cases to the supreme court.
Guess I will take Mark’s info as solid
what is your point?
Why are you starting to act like a troll?
You like Weiner, we get it.
There is only so much content going into 6-8 minute segments and then some commcommentaryentary.
Get a new hobby, this crap is getting old.
Post your CV
Thank God for Mark Levin. One of the true patriots that has always said what needed saying. I’m sure Mark appreciates the
1/2 hour you spent formulating your bullet points to reach a couple hundred people. Come back when you reach millions and maybe you would carry more than an ounce of weight.
Seems strange that so many people here attack you for your lack of credentials, celebrity status or whatever.
Guess I thought the message was all that mattered.
And a “Doctor of Jurisprudence” is not a big deal; my father graduated from Law school before they used that term and sent him his J.D. in the mail one day.
He said it made him feel like Oz had just bestowed a degree on him. I said he didn’t look like a Scarecrow...
But anyway thanks for the history. Have long wondered why apportionment was not tried. As you’ve shown, the Framers saw it as the equitable solution: the sovereign States would each pay their dues in proportion to their population.
That would keep things close to home, and the “general government” out of people’s lives. It shows how utterly contrary to the Original Intent that the 16th amendment is.
The sooner we repeal this despicable vestige of feudalism the sooner we get back to the Republic that was founded, and was so incredibly successful.
* * * * * * *
The book that you wrote with Mr. Ellison is still available at Amazon and other sites though.
http://www.amazon.com/Prosperity-Restored-State-Rate-Plan/dp/0934005001
This is the third hit at Levin that I’ve seen from you tha past couple of days.
*sniff, sniff*
Repeal the 16th.
Then we can talk about the Great Compromise of 1787
We need to return to that system.
On the 5/23 program, ML described briefly the history of the creation of the senate. He was attacking Obama’s desire to invalidate the Senate and rule by executive order. You, on the other hand go after ML and not Obama.
What’s your purpose? ML is not the enemy. ML is not trying to rule by executive order.
Why don’t you demonstrate the courtesy of pinging him so he can answer your claims, if he chooses?