Posted on 06/12/2014 6:52:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Natural Law without words.
Since others have already added 6, 7, and 8, add this as #9 to the list:
The homosexuals have a stranglehold on the media, psychiatric, judicial, and advertising industries. This makes it possible for them to control the message and law enforcement regarding homosexuality.
And it’s not just a large subset of homosexuals who are bullies: Many pro-homo heterosexuals are bullies against those who question homosexuality.
People who project their hatred onto those who question homosexuality are emotionally unstable enough, so when you imply they are hateful themselves, their reaction won’t be too pretty.
Yes, it may be too much to ask a lib to get in touch with its own feelings.
Here is what Muslims do to homosexuals.
In February 1998, the Taliban, who once ruled in Afghanistan, ordered this punishment for three men convicted of sodomy:
On Wednesday, the Taliban ordered the execution of three men for sodomy in the southern town of Kandahar, southern Afghanistan. They were ordered to be buried alive under a pile of stones and a wall was pushed on top of them by a tank.
Their lives were to be spared if they survived for 30 minutes and were still alive when the stones were removed.
Simple and clear reason says that executing homosexuals is wrong today, but where do the Taliban get the punishment of pushing a wall on the guilty men? Also, the article reports that while the religious police were meting out a flogging on a woman for fornication, a speaker chanted, “Thanks to God that we are followers of God not of the West.” This devout Muslim understands the deeper, spiritual conflict—two religious systems are at work.
In its 1991 Constitution, Iran adopted the extreme punishment of execution for sodomy. Articles 108-113 say:
Sodomy is a crime, for which both partners are punished. The punishment is death if the participants are adults, of sound mind and consenting; the method of execution is for the Shari’a judge to decide.
Later on, the summary of the Constitution says that if the guilty repent, the judge may waive the penalty. But should this penalty exist in the first place? What is the source for this extreme law in the Iranian Constitution?
On April 7, 2005, it was reported that Saudi Arabia sentenced more than 100 men to prison or flogging for “gay conduct.”
On or about March 26, a Jeddah court, meeting in a closed session in which defense attorneys were excluded, sentenced 31 of the men to prison for six months to one year, and to 200 lashes each, for unreported offenses. Four other men received two years’ imprisonment and 2,000 lashes. Police released more than 70 of the men not long after their initial arrest; reports in the Saudi press suggested that personal contacts with the government had intervened on their behalf. However, on April 3, police summoned the 70 men back to a local police station and informed them that they had been sentenced to one year’s imprisonment.
Arrest and imprisonment and / or flogging for “gay conduct”? Why? Have these radical judges left Islam?
Execution, flogging, and toppling a wall on homosexuals come from the reliable hadith and later legal rulings in Islam. They sit at its core. Execution and flogging may also come from the Quran itself.
To explain how these extremes are embedded in Islam and how Christianity offers a better solution, this article is divided up into three large sections: Islam, Christianity, and an Application, including supplemental material.
The main section “Islam” is subdivided into three sections: the Quran, the hadith, and classical legal rulings. When we analyze the Quran, we also provide the historical and literary contexts of the target verse, in order to avoid the standard, reflexive “out of context” defense from Muslims apologists (defenders).
In ‘A Moveable Feast’, Hemingway declared he was prepared to kill any homosexual man who would try to sexually assualt him. I’m sure the homosexuals are trying to wipe this passage out.
This guy is spot on with every observation. But if I SAID any of this aloud here in Crazy Lib California, the only friends I’d have left would be my fellow conservatives on the Internet!
Interesting article. Thanks for posting it, 2DV.
Hemingway got it right!
“Anal lesions occur most frequently in men who engage in anal-receptive intercourse, where the association has been observed to be as high as 95% in patients.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780052/
I've known quite a few lesbians. Every single one of them either had either very devastating or abusive heterosexual relationships, or were bisexual.
It has now passed into a truism that no one "chooses" homosexuality, this despite the fact that the scanty evidence we have says that it's no more than a predisposition for some males, and is most certainly not the least bit genetic for females. Scientists -- at least in the Downfallen West -- will not be permitted to carry on much further research in this area, or to publish the results if they're heterodox.
Still, when you point out to homosexuals that the evidence isn't really on their side, their reply is: "I can prove it to you. When did you choose to be straight?"
I've even heard the idiot Bill O'Reilly spouting this nonsense as "proof" that homosexuality isn't learned/chosen. [Because no one would "choose" to be homosexual if they had a choice.]
The problem with that "argument" is that it can be applied with equal efficacy to any non-normative, destructive behavior, and in the cases where you do that it quickly becomes clear by reductio ad absurdum how silly it is. When did millions of people "choose" to become alcoholics? When did millions of people "choose" to become junkies? When did millions of people "choose" to become compulsive gamblers, wife beaters, pedophiles, serial killers ... because no one would "choose" those lives if they really had a choice.
The flip side, that it must be hard-wired because nobody gets "cured" is equally dumb. Again, look at substance abuse. With all the societal pressure not to be an addict, and all the support available from friends, families and employers, and despite the enormous economic and personal costs, the very sad truth is that drug/alcohol rehab simply does not work for all but a relatively small handful of people. Fewer than 1 out of 20 substance abusers are cured by rehab programs. With the logic applied to homosexuals, that means we should stop trying to save the people that we can. [The 5% of addicts we save are worth saving, after all.]
HOMOSEXUAL, because there’s nothing GAY about it.
I’ll say whatever I want against queers, who can stop me!!
I hope they all die of aids!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.