Skip to comments.SWAT Unit Kills Two Dogs, Finds Little Evidence In ‘No-Knock’ Raid
Posted on 07/10/2014 2:40:58 AM PDT by moonshinner_09
Instead of leaving with the drugs and weapons they were sent to find, a Minnesota SWAT team executing a no-knock raid left with the bodies of a familys two dead dogs.
The first thing I heard was boom, Larry Lee Arman told KMSP, recalling the raid which occurred in St. Paul at 7 a.m. on Wednesday.
Bop, bop, bop, bop, bop. Right in front of us.
Equipped with a warrant for drugs and weapons, the SWAT unit barged in while Arman was asleep on a mattress with his two children, shooting Mello and Laylo, the familys two pit bulls.
One was running for her life, and they murdered her right here, Arman said, with his dogs blood still on his sneakers.
I was laying right here, and I really thought I was being murdered.
Camille Perry, Armans girlfriend and the mother of his two children, was in the bathroom when the SWAT unit broke down her door. She expressed anger that the kids could have been injured.
The only thing I was thinking was my kids were going to get hit by bullets, she told KMSP.
According to the station, the SWAT unit was executing a search warrant for weapons and drugs. After the shooting and a search of the house, the police unit recovered none of one and very little of the other, finding a small amount of marijuana residue, some clothing, and a bong.
St. Paul police told KMSP that the dogs were shot because the SWAT unit feared for their safety, and department policy allows for the removal of such threats.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Glad none of the kids were in a crib might have thrown a smoke grenade in there.
“......department policy allows for removal of the threats...”
Well, it may be policy, but it isn’t law. Regardless of ‘policy’, it is highly likely the SWAT team and police knew there were children in the home.
It may be policy, but if I’m ever on a jury for a civil suit on something like this, the police are going pay out the nose for their arrogance.
This will stop when a dog owner caps one of these cops while in the commission of animal assassination...and a jury acquits the dog owner of any crime
Law Enforcement better wake up...folks are tired of their pets being shot
The jury won’t need to acquit the dog owner.
He or she would be dead. Pull a gun during a SWAT raid on a SWAT team member and see what happens.
They’d be shot dead instantly. They might get one round off, and they’d be riddled with bullets in return by SWAT.
Enough of this sh*t. The towns that allow their police to run amuck like this need to be sued into oblivion.
Jack Booted Thug alert...This is becoming more and more typical of today’s cops in America.
Why are the politicians not taking issue of this increasing phenomenon? The entertainment industry is also to blame.
More than likely, all of them would have been murdered, and some throw away guns placed in their hands. After all, they can't have any witnesses that survive. The cops would never do that, would they? No, not possible. They are all pure as the wind driven snow. (sarc off)
I agree. One day somebody is going to return fire.
You are right. I hesitate to say what I really think, so I will keep it to myself, unfortunately.
Really, all you have to do...after your dog is shot by the cop on a judge-signed search warrant...is go to the judge’s house and shoot his dog. A couple of events like this....and judges will be thinking over the effect of a warrant and the people he has to rely up on to carry out the warrant. Shooting a guy’s dog...at the most...gets you a month in some county jail. But it sends a message once you do it in retribution.
Because all professional politicians want to grow the government. It's the business they're in. They've been growing it at twice the rate of the total economy, an expansion rate any private business would envy. Government is the most efficient wealth destroying mechanism ever invented so the expansion is inflating an unsustainable bubble that will collapse at some point. There will be a period when politicians will attempt to sustain their bubble business at all cost. History shows that means a militarized police state. We are seeing the start of that desperate period.
The best way to intimidate a captive population is not kill them, but kill their children. Dogs are the only family members Fedzilla can freely kill with no repercussions. The government hates dogs because they give citizens advance warning of approaching government workers.
..is go to the judges house and shoot his dog.
Judges , cops , lawyers , clerks ,, anyone connected with the government has the public records scrubbed to hide any hint of their identity or residence ... everything from land and tax records to D/L and license plate info is hidden from John Q. Public ... this makes them identifiable during traffic stops so that cops know not to ticket and instead just “warn” them without them having to pull the “do you know who I am?” line...
Mr. Arman, has prior arrests for escape, possession of firearm by a felon, possession of drugs, fleeing police, conspiring to commit kidnapping, assault with dangerous weapon.
All these records can be viewed at Minnesota municipal court website.
Only if one is dumb enough to shoot during the raid.
The guy’s got quite a record. So why shoot the dogs?
Damn the bad, praise the good...
Muslims, from the time of Mad Mo himself to today, also hate dogs because they warn of approaching danger.
SWAT team members are usually allowed to profiteer from forfeiture.
The reason the Spanish Inquisition was hated and feared was because it was funded by forfeiture. The Roman Inquisition was paid for by the Church.
Had Galileo been tried by the Spanish Inquisition he would have been tortured for profit by the same mentalities as are suited up in SWAT garb.
Because "law and order" has traditionally been a winning campaign theme, particularly at the local level and particularly among Republicans.
I don’t care. Don’t shoot the ******** dogs.
Substitute the harshest word in the English language for the asterisks.
And, your answer tells me you support the Police State. Because you are a cop, it informs me that it really IS ‘Us vs. Them’.
SWAT teams need to be abolished; they have become a clear and present danger to the lives, liberty, and property of the American People.
“Judges , cops , lawyers , clerks ,, anyone connected with the government has the public records scrubbed to hide any hint of their identity or residence ...”
Sounds like they all have jobs........
I was ready to get all worked up about the actions of the professionally trained dog killers until I got to this key fact:
“two pit bulls. “
So that makes it OK for the Gestapo to smash in his door, kill his dogs and any other thing the Gestapo want to do? In this case they found nothing. Go read the comments on the source link. You are defending evil. But that is what police do, isn’t it?
It's getting to the point where the only way these SWAT teams will take a moment of pause before serving a no-knock warrant is if, upon their invasion into a family's home without warning, some family members in another room than the one being broken into take up arms in response to hearing shots being fired around their loved ones. It would take these family members killing several SWAT members to make these jack-booted thugs rethink their "tactic."
Unless they fear for their lives in executing no-knock raids, these will continue indefinitely.
I have a policy about anyone who harms one of my dogs. I doubt the cops would like it much. I don’t care. I’ll take my chances with a jury.
Bingo. After. Long after. A dish served cold.
A 6-minute YouTube video by yours truly and Mark P. Ferri, about the loss of freedom in America.
If I’m on the jury you don’t have anything to worry about.
I would be publishing pictures of the dead dogs and getting the emotional hype going. Use the situation like a Bambi or Lion King story and turn the public against them.
No weapons are needed. Just use the propaganda war on emotions against them.
Take pictures of the children with tears running down their faces and blood on them as they grieve for their lost pet. A few of these and public opinion would change.
When you are dealing with a public that is emotionally motivated by fear, use it. Crying and wailing are sometimes powerful weapons against oppression.
Which translates into, "It's okay to grab him, guns a blazing, where there is a higher likelihood his kids, spouse, dogs and other innocents will be shot and killed."
Are you peace officers hired by us to protect and serve your communities, or are you law enforcement officers hired by bureaucrats to keep us compliant? You can't be both.
I used to thank peace officers when I saw them. Now I avoid you people (now "law enforcement officers") whenever possible. I'm far more afraid of you than the gangs in my town. They are far less capable of the wanton destruction my family.
“Theyd be shot dead instantly. They might get one round off, and theyd be riddled with bullets in return by SWAT.
You are right. I hesitate to say what I really think, so I will keep it to myself, unfortunately.”
Should'a shot HIM- last time he ran. Then the dogs would be safe.
It is time consuming but simple to follow these people home after work. Just follow them part way each day and you’ll soon know more about them than you were expecting.
That is the same excuse all gov’t workers use for any problem and as an excuse for not using any logic or common sense. They are following policy. Following policy allows them to keep their job and pensions.
I'd bet cold cash it would get you more than that.
All of this means, that the cops have no option if they want to execute a search warrant other than storming his home with a large group of masked gunmen, killing his dogs, and terrorizing his children (not to mention the extreme danger they were place in) , all to recover some "pot residue" and a bong.
Great job drug warriors!
They missed a golden opportunity to burn a couple of children. SWAT must be slipping.
I guess most of you don’t realize that drug dealers use pit bulls and other large dogs for protection from other drug dealers and also to give the police something to do should they raid the house. Some drug dealers even have the dogs vocal chords removed.
I’m not defending the police. My view of no-knocks has changed. No-knocks should be done away with.
My point in this is to show what a fine, upstanding citizen this guy is, other than the story painted by the media.
How many of you would want this guy as your neighbor? I’m guessing none. I’m also guessing many of you, had you been living next to this guy, would be belly-aching because of the perceived inactivity of the police to shut down a drug house.
I am simply pointing out what the media failed to point out. This guys a thug. Most likely been to prison more than once. Probably kept the pits for protection against other drug dealers and to deter the cops.
I suspect (though I may very well be wrong) that his conspiracy/kidnapping/assault/weapons charge came from him breaking into another drug dealers house.
Funny how people on FR think the media lies, unless of course it comes to something that the cops do.
Amusing to me.
Where did I defend evil? All I did was put up a partial list of his criminal history.
Although the police found nothing, as you say, I’m sure that their narcotics officers had prior drug buys from the house. In other words, they were likely selling drugs and people went to jail.
Though the media doesn’t print that part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.