I thought the "regulated" part was anathema to libertarians. Now it's not?
Legal regulated marijuana is "no-holds-barred" libertarianism? Then what is restrained libertarianism?
I thought the "regulated" part was anathema to libertarians. Now it's not?
I made no claims at all, much less any claim that regulation was OK with libertarians. You seemed to claim that legal regulated marijuana - the subject of "this article" - is "no-holds-barred" libertarianism. Is that your claim? If so, what is restrained libertarianism?