Posted on 08/02/2014 3:16:05 PM PDT by Randall_S
I’d give Randall a chance, a quick review of his posts shows an almost 1:1 ratio of articles to replies.
If he was a pure pimp, he’d never reply.
Randall_S, I agree. You should either quit posting the blog at all (preferred) or quit excerpting it.
If you're going to apologize, do it for everybody.
If that’s true then why do they allow usagaydy to keep on posting from that fake newssite examinerdotcom when he/she openly admits that he/she does it to get more hits -but insists it all goes to charity?
There are strong limits, however. I know because I ran up against them when I tried to post an OPINION piece regarding 911, as posted at my blogpage. I wasn’t even trying to excerpt it, offered the entire essay, but it was a topic nopt allowed at FR.
See above.
I’m not familiar with a poster “usagaydy” but I do know that Examiner is an “excerpt only” site, due to legal threats made by some bloggers who only wanted to leech off of FR traffic.
The biggest problem with Examiner is that it is infested with all kinds of malware, spyware, adware - you name it. Every time I’ve (mistakenly) clicked on that cesspool, I’ve had to give my machine an enema.
If you think someone is purposely misusing this site, “abuse” is your best recourse. Randall is new, so maybe just pointing out the customs will be sufficient.
Needless to day, the vast majority of their content consists of plagiarized versions of actual news stories or outright fabrications, not to mention things such as motherships landings.
I run a linux machine so malware does not usually post a problem, and Adblocker Plus with Ghostery takes care of the rest.
Nonetheless, the point remains: certain FReepers continue to start threads with examinerdotcom listed as the source, with the most blatant openly admitting that she/he/it does it to generate revenue while insisting that it's all for charity.
We’re sunk. (don’t know anything ‘bout who u r / or blog?)
It truly does. *grin*
Fortunately, she hasn’t pimped her Examiner trash in over a month:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:randalls/index?tab=articles
“Who, what, when, where and how are you getting this info? I am overwhelmed by it all, need a couple of hours to read all about Qatar.”
I have the same reaction. The articles on the blog contain numerous links to support the asserting of the author. The responses to this post seem to be attacking the messenger rather than considering the message.
Reading some of the postings on the Middle East, I realize how little I know about who is controlling whom in the international arena. The reporting about Qatar makes Soros’ influence and interference look insignificant.
The ‘misterchmbers’ website seems to be a good resource for further investigation.
{Randall S, I hope you are wrong, but fear you are accurate. Don’t let them wear you down.}
“asserting” should be “assertions”.
The website is - Misterchambers.com”
Sorry for the typos.
Thank you, Mr. Cousin of John Galt...
That was the entire point of the post. Qatar is a the toxic influence, and I believe I’ve proven that again, and again, and again...
You are precisely correct. Soros is chump change compared to the al Thanis.
Perhaps in the future you won’t find any reason to excerpt your own material.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.