Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Modern Art — rebelling against aesthetics, taste, God, America, and basic drafting standards
Bookwormroom.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Bookworm

Posted on 09/02/2014 1:19:48 PM PDT by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2014 1:19:49 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

If everything is art, then nothing is art.


2 posted on 09/02/2014 1:26:38 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Some artists like to push the envelope to see what they can get away with.
The problem is that we're spending huge amount of tax payer money on so-called art that it's tilting the market.
In normal times, what people are willing to spend THEIR OWN MONEY on will eventually weed out the crap art.

3 posted on 09/02/2014 1:28:07 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
I now also see that an anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Enlightenment ideology also drives modern art.

Secular humanism leads to subjectivism and relativism, which leads to lack of standards, which leads to pluralism and equivalency.

Postmodernism leads to nihilism,which leads to destruction of art.

4 posted on 09/02/2014 1:30:08 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Commie goal

22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings,” substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.


5 posted on 09/02/2014 1:31:59 PM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

In Cleveland, we have that stooped rubber stamp “sculpture. I say;

Today, Art can be a booger with a hair in it!


6 posted on 09/02/2014 1:33:02 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Commie goal

23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”


7 posted on 09/02/2014 1:33:03 PM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

“I’ve since expanded my original theory about photography’s and atheism’s effects on art. I now also see that an anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Enlightenment ideology also drives modern art.”

If it is without God, against America and communist, it can’t be art. It may be something, but not art.


8 posted on 09/02/2014 1:34:34 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

1. Robert Rauschenberg, White Painting [three panel], 1951; latex paint on canvas, 72 in. x 108 in. (182.88 cm x 274.32 cm); Collection SFMOMA, Purchase through a gift of Phyllis Wattis; © Robert Rauschenberg Foundation / Licensed by VAGA, New York, NY

9 posted on 09/02/2014 1:49:33 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
" Dempsey and Fripo " by George Bellows, 1924 Modern Art
10 posted on 09/02/2014 1:56:37 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
" Nighthawks " by Edward Hopper 1942, Modern Art
11 posted on 09/02/2014 1:58:24 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44
" Snow in New York " Robert Henri, 1902 Modern Art
12 posted on 09/02/2014 2:01:14 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

I have a print of that picture and saw the original a few years ago at the MFA,Boston.

I love his work

.


13 posted on 09/02/2014 2:01:16 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Some twenty years ago I was a visiting scholar at the Institute for Technological Research at the University of Sao Paolo, in Brazil.

One Sunday my colleagues took me to the Museum of Modern Art in Sao Paolo. One of the items on display was a 3-dimensional gridwork of metal rods. The "thing" was about a foot and a half on a side, and the rods looked about the size of welding rods.

A few days later my colleagues took me along on a trip to a project the Institute was carrying out. On the way we passed a spot where a bridge was being built over the road. The workers had put together a framework of reinforcing bars, ready to have the forms put up and the concrete poured for a bridge pillar. I looked at the thing and laughed. Except for scale, that rebar framework looked just like the "thing" in the art museum.

I think all of "modern art" is a fraud.

14 posted on 09/02/2014 2:04:15 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (Book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Available from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Modern Art being defined as from roughly 1860 to 1970 there are some masterpieces from this time period.

Perhaps some of the good folks on FR are thinking of Contemporary Art of which I find very little to celebrate.

But please, lets not whitewash an entire movement as rubbish. Its not and to do so is just flat out ignorant.


15 posted on 09/02/2014 2:04:24 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mears

I loved that MFA show and was so happy to attend. They really had an exceptional collection of his works on display.

Truly an American master and a fine example of Modern Art.


16 posted on 09/02/2014 2:05:39 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mears
If you have a chance ( and forgive me if you know about them ) take a look at the ‘ Ashcan School ‘ of American art. Early 20th century for the most part and just fantastic works.

Hopper was no doubt influenced by them.

I am also very fond of 20th century self taught artists. They paint for the love of it without a thing to prove to anyone.

Counter that with the laugh out loud foolishness of many contemporary artists.

17 posted on 09/02/2014 2:09:19 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

“If you have a chance ( and forgive me if you know about them ) take a look at the ‘ Ashcan School ‘”


This is astonishing. I never heard of The Ashcan School until 2 days ago. It was a crossword puzzle clue-— (Sloan was the answer). I then read about them and was fascinated.

I’m early 20th century too-—born in 1932. :-)

.


18 posted on 09/02/2014 2:17:29 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

“Nighthawks” is a favorite of mine - reminds me of that Tom Waits album, “Nighthawks at the Diner”.


19 posted on 09/02/2014 2:19:06 PM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44
Love Hopper! Andrew Wyeth is a genius too -
20 posted on 09/02/2014 2:49:40 PM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson