Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

t Sure Looks Like Jeb Bush Isn't Running For President
American Thinker ^ | December 12, 2013 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 12/12/2014 9:23:53 PM PST by Steelfish

December 12, 2014 It Sure Looks Like Jeb Bush Isn't Running For President By Thomas Lifson Forget about all those speeches, meetings with donors, and campaign appearances for others before the election. Money talks. Bloomberg reports (via The Weekly Standard):

"Documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Nov list Bush as chairman and manager of a new offshore private equity fund, Global Aviation, which raised $61million in September, largely from foreign ­investors. In November the fund ­incorporated in the United Kingdom and Wales­—a ­structure, several independent finance lawyers say, that operates like a tax haven by allowing overseas investors to avoid U.S. taxes and regulations.

"Global Aviation is one of at least three such funds Bush has launched in less than two years through his Coral Gables (Fla.) company, Britton Hill Holdings. He’s also chairman of a $26million fund, Logistics, established in April with backing from a Chinese conglomerate, and a $40million fund involved in shale oil exploration, ­according to documents filed in June and first ­reported on by Bloomberg News. Hat tip: Richard Baehr

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 12/12/2014 9:23:53 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Waste of time, waste of donor money.


2 posted on 12/12/2014 9:25:32 PM PST by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Maybe Little Jebbie has been reading FR?


3 posted on 12/12/2014 9:26:20 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Jesse Jackson: "Stay outa Da Bushes, stay outta Da Bushes"

OK Jesse, I'm with you this time...

4 posted on 12/12/2014 9:26:21 PM PST by PROCON (Always give 100%...unless you're donating blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It’s beginning to look like Jeb’s not running, everywhere I go.


5 posted on 12/12/2014 9:29:14 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

At first I thought that was the stock Frank Burns was fooled into purchasing in a MASH epesode. (actually Pioneer Aviation)


6 posted on 12/12/2014 9:32:43 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Jeb also has some connection to a company which stands to make a killing if Common Core is adopted.

I don't know the particulars but maybe some enterprising Freeper can fill in the details.

7 posted on 12/12/2014 9:33:17 PM PST by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

8 posted on 12/12/2014 9:35:06 PM PST by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sure has a lot of money from foreigners in shady offshore accounts. Just what does he produce to warrant all that money?


9 posted on 12/12/2014 10:13:31 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It doesn’t matter who is running for the Republicans, there are just enough purists on the conservative side who won’t vote at all because no one is conservative enough, and refuse to choose the lesser of two evils. So they’re willing to let a flaming liberal win the election instead.


10 posted on 12/12/2014 10:17:55 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Yep. I am. I say push it all over the cliff now while we can still count on a majority in the Army and Marines.


11 posted on 12/12/2014 10:39:05 PM PST by QuisCustodiet1776 (Live free or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Flaming liberals include Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney and Chris Christie.


12 posted on 12/12/2014 10:49:00 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: QuisCustodiet1776

The Marxist we put in charge due to negligence is quickly doing away with our Army and Marines, and transforming the rest. He’s starting at the top and working his way down from there.


13 posted on 12/12/2014 11:23:25 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
"what does he produce"

Grease for palms.

None for elbows.

14 posted on 12/13/2014 12:22:34 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
It doesn’t matter who is running for the Republicans, there are just enough purists on the conservative side who won’t vote at all because no one is conservative enough, and refuse to choose the lesser of two evils. So they’re willing to let a flaming liberal win the election instead.

An overabundance of purity is hardly the country's problem.

Any more than an overabundance of purity is a problem in a barnyard full of pigs after six inches of rain.

15 posted on 12/13/2014 12:32:00 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

It’s not really the “purity” that’s the problem. It’s what you do faced with the lack of it. If you go to battle, do you choose to go weaponless because the purity of a steel sword is less than what you hoped? You make do with the best you can get in the real world. Although a liberal Republican will be difficult to control, a Marxist Democrat will be impossible, especially since their voter base is not you.


16 posted on 12/13/2014 12:42:23 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

It isn’t the quality of the weapons that is the problem. It’s the intent of the ones wielding them.


17 posted on 12/13/2014 12:45:46 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
It doesn’t matter who is running for the Republicans, there are just enough purists on the conservative side who won’t vote at all because no one is conservative enough, and refuse to choose the lesser of two evils. So they’re willing to let a flaming liberal win the election instead.

Reagan won in two landslide elections. Republicans haven't run a conservative since, and haven't had a landslide win since. GHWB squeaked through once (on Reagan's coattails), and lost the second time. Dole lost against what was, at the time, the most corrupt regime in US history. GWB squeaked through twice. McCain lost in a landslide by allowing his staff (borrowed from Romney) attack his conservative running mate. Romney lost in a landslide against what was already proven to be the absolutely most corrupt, anti-American, pro-muslim, evil administration in US history.

More people voted for Romney in 2012 than had voted for McCain in 2008, and he still lost. You cannot blame that on conservatives sitting out the election. You can blame it on many swing voters seeing Romney as Obama-Lite, and sticking with the correctly-labeled liberal.

When Republicans run a conservative, Republicans win.

Jeb Bush is not a conservative. Romney is not a conservative. Christie is not a conservative.

Republicans did the exact same thing against FDR, and lost four times. This recent Cromnibus Bill demonstrates that the GOP-e has learned nothing.

18 posted on 12/13/2014 12:56:21 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

The ideal situation is of course for the GOP to realize that its voter base is conservative. Instead they try to appeal to liberals, as if a liberal will ever vote for a Republican. They keep thinking they have to “reach out” and “compromise”, when experience should tell them it’s principles, not compromise that wins votes. The problem, though, is not just the liberal Republicans, but that often there is no choice in who is nominated for election.


19 posted on 12/13/2014 1:56:24 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I'd vote for a Flavor Flav/Al Sharpton ticket before I'd vote for "Jeb".


20 posted on 12/13/2014 2:04:33 AM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson