Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With $2 Billion at Stake, $100 Fines Won't Deter Violations of State Law
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 5/28/2015 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 06/02/2015 1:54:40 PM PDT by MichCapCon

The "News" section of the Godfrey-Lee Public Schools website features a link to Superintendent David Britten’s personal blog, “Superintendent's Notes," which includes an article, "Proposal 1 Straight Talk."

The article circles back to comments from another individual who holds a position of public trust in the district, reporting that “Eric Mockerman, president of the Godfrey-Lee school board, said he thinks a 1-cent sales tax increase is minimal amount to pay for what residents end up getting out of a yes vote for their roads, schools and cities.” Read some more on the same page and you'll find that the "Godfrey-Lee Board of Education Supports Proposal 1."

ForTheRecord says: Michigan law prohibits governmental entities like school districts from using taxpayer resources to “expressly advocate” for a yes or no vote on a ballot measure. This has been determined to apply when a government website uses the device of linking to another website that is engaging in express advocacy.

Also, the state Elections Bureau has held that using the term “yes” in communications like this is a potential violation of these express advocacy rules. Other officials questioned about potential violations have implicitly acknowldedged this by referring to “yes” as the “magic word” which has to be avoided.

But the Godfrey-Lee example highlights a bigger problem with the current rules against taxpayer-funded electioneering. If voters approve Proposal 1 on May 5 it means an additional $2 billion in state government revenue, including $300 million for school districts. Yet past experience suggests that the most Godfrey-Lee risks for violating these rules is a $100 fine. With $2 billion at stake, a $100 fine isn't much of a deterrent to violating the community’s trust by campaigning with taxpayer resources.


TOPICS: Education
KEYWORDS: fines

1 posted on 06/02/2015 1:54:40 PM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

A few years back, they passed an ordinance putting destroying a sand dune or picking a sea oat was a $200 fine.

A condo developer came in and leveled some sand dunes. Paid the $600 fine and everyone was happy. No word on how much the county commissioners got under the table.


2 posted on 06/02/2015 2:35:11 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The “1 cent” statement that you read just cracks me up. It’s always “one cent” or “two cents”. Fine. At the end of the year, I’ll send in my penny. I’ll even pay for the stamp.


3 posted on 06/02/2015 2:41:59 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
ah, the way back machine, fyi, the voters of Michigan overwhelmingly rejected prop-1.

meanwhile, one of my pet peeves, is calling an increase in sales tax one cent.... or one penny. Figures never lie, but liars always figure. One percent is not one penny.

Gaaah.

4 posted on 06/02/2015 2:42:22 PM PDT by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson