Skip to comments.Constitution-denier Piers Morgan: Whites who use the N-word should be jailed
Posted on 06/23/2015 3:53:22 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
'Piers who,' now?
Constitution-denier Piers Morgan: Whites who use the N-word should be jailedYou may remember Piers Morgan as that British guy used to have a show on CNN. He famously challenged a certain Mr. Herman Cain to a debate after I wrote a few pieces about his moronic anti-2nd Amendment diatribes. At the time, he arrogantly waved around a copy of the U.S. Constitution and referred to it dismissively as your little book. Then his show was cancelled and he was, pretty much, never seen again.
...But here at The Cain we like to keep tabs on our old pals, so I make sure to check in with his Twitter feed every now and again.
Not content to simply attack gun ownership, Piers has decided to go after free speech as well. He has announced that, according to the brilliant mind of Piers Morgan, uttering the N-word should be a jailable offense.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Anyone that gives a rat’s ass as to what Piers Morgan says about anything should be jailed.
Limeys who crap on our Constitution should be jailed.
The jails will be seriously overcrowded with blacks who use the word towards each other. I know, he said whites but since Regressives are all about “fairness” and “equality”, then anyone who uses the word should be jailed.
All should have the freedom to use that word whenever they please.
Those using the word should be prepared to get the s*** kicked out of them by the person who was the target of the word.
What about half whites like Odumbo? Should they serve half sentences?
Let’s start calling it the “obama-word”.
“President Obama’s reference of the ‘n-word’ in an interview has left the African-American community divided on who can say it and whether it should be allowed at all.”
I will use any word I want any time I want. No one has control of my speech except me. Anybody who wants to control my speech knows where to shove it and what to kiss.
Walked behind 2 black guys the other day. N-word this, N-word that, Aks you a question, lots of cursing, we be did that, etc... Just amazing.
And, blacks who use the N word?
they would never do such a thing.
You’re all wasting your time responding to Sean Anthony.
He(?) just pimps that blog an moves on, hasn’t made a comment in years.
You are all just ciphers to him(?).. just a blog hit.
That go for those that call White people, "cracker?"
Who gets to define what is offensive speech that deserves getting the "s*** kicked out of them?"
We, as a people, have the right to use words that sometimes offend. That is what Free Speech is all about; To speak of ideas and things (and people) that might offend. If we limit to non-offensive speech, why do we have a First Amendment?
Besides, who decides if it is offensive? Liberals? See too much of that already.
Should conservatives shout down/kick the "s***" out of those WE find offensive? There goes the entire democRAT party, as well as our own.
If we are limited to only speech that no one objects to, then we have no need for a First Amendment. We have the hecklers veto and threats of violence to silence those that we find offensive.
Conservative arguments? Ban them, as they are offensive to liberals and therefore, anyone expressing such offensive thoughts deserve to get the "s*** kicked out of them."
Remember, "Free men have free tongues" (Sophocles).
in that order?
>>in that order?<<
Send the parts back to Her Majesty.
"The Sons of Liberty assembled at night in the fields... To such a pass are matters come too, that at Philadelphia in a Stationers Shop was found wrote in a blank Book G____ by the C__se of G_d, us_per of G___t B__t__n, and Dest_r_y of the Faith. Great Enquiries were made, but unfortunely to no purpose." p.347"Montresor`s Journals" 1766. 19 Jan. [Scull]
March 1766 "This night the Sons of Liberty assembled and insolently sent Mr. Allecocke [son of a mulatto woman] and Seares,two of their Representatives on board the Garland Ship of War to demand the Lieut of His majesty`s Ship for having said that the Printer of the Thursday`s Gazette, was he in England, would be hanged for the licentuoisness of his Paper." p.353
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.