Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airbus Scientist to Announce 'Major Theoretical Breakthrough' in Cold Fusion in October
E-Cat World ^ | 8/14/2015

Posted on 08/14/2015 12:22:28 PM PDT by Normandy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Interesting that an Airbus scientist would get so passionate about a cold fusion theory.
1 posted on 08/14/2015 12:22:28 PM PDT by Normandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Normandy

Power plant for trasportation?


2 posted on 08/14/2015 12:23:49 PM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

“I completely revert the burden of proof to orthodox physicists who now will have to prove the non-existence of cold fusion, if they can, since they have been claiming it for years if not decades. The only way my theory leaves them, is to find a counter example to our theory.”

This is kind of an odd statement. He has a theoretical proof and now the burden is on everyone else to disprove his theory?


3 posted on 08/14/2015 12:27:41 PM PDT by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Normandy
I made a major theoretical breakthrough in the field of “energy creation”.

"Theoretical" being the operative word.

And why doesn't anybody use proper punctuation at the end of a sentence with quotes? Did they pass a law against it or something?

4 posted on 08/14/2015 12:28:13 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (To defeat the democRATs, we must first defeat the Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy
Pretty late in the year for this year's version of: "I have solved cold fusion!"

Wonder what next year's world-changing breakthrough will be?

5 posted on 08/14/2015 12:29:02 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

He’s an incredibly brilliant super-scientist, not a logician.


6 posted on 08/14/2015 12:30:06 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

If the theory works, make a reactor, collect free energy, get rich, who cares what anybody else thinks.


7 posted on 08/14/2015 12:30:55 PM PDT by Nep Nep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Theoretical” being the operative word.

Yeah. I think the next time a bill collector calls me I’ll tell them I made a “theoretical” payment last week.


8 posted on 08/14/2015 12:31:32 PM PDT by rfreedom4u (Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And why doesn't anybody use proper punctuation at the end of a sentence with quotes? Did they pass a law against it or something?

Because the proper punctuation feels so counter intuitive?

9 posted on 08/14/2015 12:37:10 PM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Normandy
warning: major gobbledy-gook ahead.
10 posted on 08/14/2015 12:41:26 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Voting is acting white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

What was it Yogi Berra said about the difference between theory and practice?


11 posted on 08/14/2015 12:41:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

They combined mayonnaise with Miracle Whip?


12 posted on 08/14/2015 12:44:46 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (The other day I... No, that wasn't me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

Back in high school I learned that energy, like matter, can be neither created nor destroyed, but can be transformed into the other.
That principle has not changed.


13 posted on 08/14/2015 12:48:52 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

I don’t believe there is any possibility that cold fusion is possible. If you measure the energy output of a glass of water, and there appears to be a surplus, fusion is not the most simple answer. You would have to see other atoms besides hydrogen and oxygen. A more likely explanation would be the decay of heavy hydrogen within water molecules. You would still have the same amount of water.


14 posted on 08/14/2015 12:49:27 PM PDT by webheart (We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

Ah, spice.


15 posted on 08/14/2015 12:55:26 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (American Jobs for American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normandy
“energy creation”

I'll stick with the "turn matter into energy" people.

16 posted on 08/14/2015 1:03:41 PM PDT by Fhios (Immigration without assimilation is an invasion. -- Bobby Jindal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I remember my fist time creating energy. It involved a plate of beans, a few beers and egg salad.


17 posted on 08/14/2015 1:05:33 PM PDT by Fhios (Immigration without assimilation is an invasion. -- Bobby Jindal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

Am I crazy, or did this guy just say, “Cold Fusion exists because I said it exists...go prove it doesn’t”?

Isn’t that like Adam’s shirt on “Mythbusters”?
“I reject your reality, and substitute my own!”


18 posted on 08/14/2015 1:05:35 PM PDT by rikkir (You can lead a horde to knowledge but you can't make them think. (TnkU ctdonath2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
Sounds like lunacy to me.

As a consequence, even if the burden of proof remains to cold fusionists to experimentally prove, at least, they are right, on a theoretical point of view, I completely revert the burden of proof to orthodox physicists who now will have to prove the non-existence of cold fusion, if they can, since they have been claiming it for years if not decades.

How can anyone be "right" on a theoretical point of view? Indeed, you can't be wrong on a theoretical point of view, but the only way to certify you are right, is to prove it, making it a fact, not a theory.

19 posted on 08/14/2015 1:07:14 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And why doesn't anybody use proper punctuation at the end of a sentence with quotes? Did they pass a law against it or something?

I don't know if the writer is using what many call a "British style," but it calls for placing that period outside the quotation mark. I've seen multiple examples from countries that tend to follow that style. (The rest of the quotation has other things that I'd edit: for example, I'd remove the comma from "The only way my theory leaves them, is to find a counter example to our theory.")

20 posted on 08/14/2015 1:11:19 PM PDT by Lonely Bull ("When he is being rude or mean it drives people _away_ from his confession and _towards_ yours.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson